Bumpsteer .... The topic that won't die


So I measured bumpsteer on the Rack and pinion I am building, it's based on Gene's work. I used three different tierod lengths, 17.5" 18"and 19.5"
The results are in the chart below.
The chart shows that the shortest tierod is still too long and it needs to be moved up a tad.
For reference I did make some measurements with the tierod 17.5" long and about 1" higher, it's result is in chart 2
This is preliminary data, but I think the results are interesting and it's not bad for a first guess I think.
Now All I need to do is a little curve fitting, a little interpolation and I should be able to nail this BS to almost zero. ( well I have to align the car for castor and camber first too)
Chart 1 ( tie rod needs to be shorter and higher )
Chart 2 ( inner tie rod way too high )
at any rate, my tie rods are 19 and 21 inches long....
and the shortening of them would require a wider mounting bracket to the rack...something that is not so bad tie rod wise, but I question the stresses put on the rack travelor/car....all the increaed twisting/loading...wonder about rack internal stress/wear factors...
GENE


I mean look at it, being too high gives almost 1/2 inch of bumpsteer!
While the difference between the longest and shortest tierod was only .020"!
(I'm ignoreing the negative excursion since I think its mostly due to tierod height effects)
So I would look at height a lot more critically
GENE
When we made the change on your car, it was from measurement from your car. You cannot assume that the changes made on one car will be the same on another as slight changes in mounting will make huge changes on the car. The race cars that we run are built on a jig, so every one should be the same. Yet when you bump steer them every one takes different adjustments to make them correct. When you guys are doing R&P conversions, the fabrication is done by eyeball and tape measure so no two will ever be the same.
As I stated earlier, Our Corvettes should have a end take off rack to be correct. I do not believe you will ever get a "perfect" bump steer with a center take off rack because the tie rods are too long. So the adjustments you make will have to be the best compromise.
Keith;
Did you get those numbers from accual measurements with a bump steer guage or are they from measuring points on the car and plotting them out? I have been real interested in someone actually bump steering a R&P conversion.
[Modified by Pete79L82, 6:56 AM 11/17/2003]
I love the headers I wound up with those Schoenfeldt #151 they fit fine and work well, and are CHEAP....at 150 bux/pair....
At any rate, my buddy the welder is working 7 ten hour days...round the clock untill further notice....lovely....
GENE
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Some of the manufactures of race car P/S racks are Sweet. Appleton and Woodward. And I am sure there are others.
Pete
[Modified by Pete79L82, 7:33 AM 11/17/2003]


I bought a longacre CC gauge but it hasn't arrived yet..
I agree that the CTO rack is not best of all worlds but it is a big step up in my book and adaptinga CTO I might as well just adapt a C4 system...
I can't comment on rack and pinion bump steer but have learned alot about our systems. I found the height of the outer tie rod really makes a big difference. I also found tie rod length played a big part.
Good luck and I will certainly follow this post.


Norval,
Which adapter did you get? They sold me the GM adapter and it was too small so I sent it back to get the magnetic adapter, that way I can do any car.
Yes I am taking Bump steer seriously, I would like to get it as near zero as possible in all attitudes. I was very excited to see the curves that looked exactly like the books say they should. I knew my tierods were too long, I wanted to be able to shorten them since my tierod stretcher is broken...and my tests proved the current height is pretty close, way cool!
One thing I forgot to mention is that I did do a bumpsteer at 30' and it wasn't all that much different than straight ahead, very encouraging!
Gene,
I did sneak over and measure the heights of the tie rod ends and the inner end at it's best height was 3" above the outer end. So I think 3.1 to 3.2 would be about perfect.
My curve is confussing. On bump up I toe in regardless of what I do to mounting locations and heights but have only .015 bump in on compression of 3 inches. The amount of bump in at rise varies alot with outer tie rod location and tie rod length.
I tested a brand new Mustang and got 3/4 toe in at 3 inches rise. The factory hasn't worried about this problem obviously.
I am down to 5/16th toe in at 3 inches rise and .015 at 3 inches down. I will get rid of that 5/16 before I am satifified.
GENE
This winter I want to again remove the springs and do it far more accurate then I can do with the springs still installed


Boy what a dummy, I measured the rod ends as the car sat but the car is on jack stands so the suspension is at full droop! :bb
I'll have to measure again at ride height, sorry!
Norval,
Do you still have your bumpsteer data?
I'd really like to see it. I have a paper that shows how to decipher the different slopes and curves and I'd like to see how yours looks.
Until I put my new spindles in I don't want to spend too much time working out the bump steer. This is another winter project. I did try 4 different length tie rods, each 1 inch longer then the other plus 4 different center links, I also spend alot of time lowering the outer tie rod end then made it permanent. I am just finishing the coil overs and should be finished this weekend.
I will then start replacing the spindles and do fine tuning on the bump steer.
So far I have install custom steering arms, tie rods, drag link and adjustable upper ball joints. These spindles are next.
Double click to enlarge
It should be centered.
Edit: That was a little vague, referring to the caliper mount, not bumpsteer of course.
[Modified by RUXperienced, 8:18 PM 11/18/2003]
















