When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Was wondering if a larger spark plug gap would increase the heat range of a plug. I have mine gaped at .040 now and my MSD instruction manual said to gap the plugs between .050 and .060. Will that produce a hotter spark or just a larger one?
From: At my Bar drinking and wrenching in Lafayette Colorado
Re: Does a larger spark plug gap=hotter? (467-Ratman)
467 -
Westech Peformance in LA (the outfit that does all the dyno testing for Hot Rod/Car Craft/ Hi PerfChev, etc.) has a really neat distributor machine with a spark plug tester. I got to play a bit with this machine last time I was out there doing dyno runs with Hot Rod, and I found out the same thing that Westech has known for years:
This machine allows you to pressurize the spark plugs to simulate cylinder pressure while the distributor fires the plugs. Little "windows" allow you to observe the plug sparks at elevated cylinder pressure. What I found is that gaps in excess of .040, even with an MSD system, will cause the plugs to begin misfiring at peak cylinder pressures and elevated rpm (or the arc will jump the plug wires). Big gaps work well on low performance engines that do not produce high power levels (high cylinder pressure). But high compression, high power engines do not perform reliably at elevated rpm with big plug gaps. For this reason, Westech and Dougan's Engine Service run all their engines at .035 - .040 gaps. This produces reliable spark and ignition throughout the rpm range with low possibility of misfire. Larger gaps will either not fire the plugs at all, or the spark will arc across the plug wires at elevated cylinder pressures.
...just the facts as I have personally observed them with some good testing equipment...
That's cool lars....I have beleived the same to be true for years. When I was in college, we studied the effects of plug gaps to varying engine designs. And what we found back then with 1980 technology seems to still apply in this modern era. I was recently working on a newer Mustang with modern electronics to control engine spark duties and experienced a mid to high rpm misfire. After regapping the plugs a little closer, the misfire went away. Performance was not negatively affected in any way by the closer gap. So that proves that theory to be right on the money.
I ran into this with my non stock fuel injected 460 a few years ago, It ran the best with stock plug gaps, I found this out after pulling and regapping them 4 different times. :banghead: