C6 at the dragstrip
Still had temp plates on it! This car barely had 500 miles on it. It was a 6 spd, precision red (already discontinued) owned by Cartek - soon will be heavily modded.
getting ready to go......
He comes around towards the starting line......
staged ..... even with traction control off apparently you can't turn off "torque" management, so he couldn't do a burnout.
OK - I know you expected him to be in the 12s, but this was his FIRST pass!!
(but there were a pair of showroom stock mercs (the ones that look just like a Crossfire) that were well into the 12s!
)It was BUICK day also at the track! Some real sweet cars... but here are just a few of the vettes... C6 at the back..

Hey!! too bad I missed having a midyear in this pic... would have had every generation...
Last edited by PRNDL; Sep 5, 2004 at 10:39 AM.
On the C5, with traction control turned off via the DIC; you can spin the tires to hell and back.
Looks more and more like a driver issue.





Anyway I think GM must have hired the ex-Tiburon styling engineers that were fired a few years ago, either that or that guy backed into a wall

You would think with all the time and money spent on the car they would finish off the rear end.
Last edited by MotorHead; Sep 5, 2004 at 12:11 PM.

Anyway I think GM must have hired the ex-Tiburon styling engineers that were fired a few years ago, either that or that guy backed into a wall

You would think with all the time and money spent on the car they would finish off the rear end.
A good driver should be able to get the car into the 12's on a decent track...


The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
The C6s that have been on the dyno are showing 335+rwhp (rated at 400bhp). The C5 Z06 (rated at 405hp) makes ~355+rwhp stock. Hmm....
Whatever... 335rwhp, 3180lb car, decent air... should be 112mph through the traps easily.
There are a few plausible explanations. They would include but not be limited to:
1. The car is simply not being broken in yet. But then was the one which ran 12.7?
2. Driver skill. But one would expect that the Cartek guys would be pretty good drivers.
3. That particular C6 example was not as strong as the one which ran the 12.7.
4. Traction issues. The car is still on runcraps, even if they are "second generation" runcraps. You can't polish "crap".
5. Weather conditions and elevation. I don't know where the 12.7 was run, but that could play a role too.
6. And finally, the 1/4 mile times may have been exaggerated to begin with.
I doubt torque management played a role, because torque management was in use on the other car if it was indeed a "stock" production model which would be available to the public.
Torque management will likely have to be edited out with programming, which should help the 1/4 mile times.
If they have gotten it down to 13.1, I suspect that its just a matter of time before they break 13, bone stock. It might take a few more miles though.
Last edited by '06 Quicksilver Z06; Sep 6, 2004 at 10:15 AM.
If GM hands you the keys and says "road test" you drive differently than if it's your own car barely broken in. It's a 6 speed. I know those of you that have driven sticks on the strip understand how granny shifting can slow you down. He later went 13.1 @ 109. He can probably do better. I'm sure many will easily have their bone stock C6s in the 12s. Torque management definitely kicked in when he tried to do a burnout - I saw it. I don't know if it affected his launch. Some of these comments are getting downright silly. Cartek modified ZO6's run in the 10s. They don't have to make their mods "look good".
Last edited by PRNDL; Sep 5, 2004 at 11:10 PM.

If GM hands you the keys and says "road test" you drive differently than if it's your own car barely broken in. It's a 6 speed. I know those of you that have driven sticks on the strip understand how granny shifting can slow you down. He later went 13.1 @ 109. He can probably do better. I'm sure many will easily have their bone stock C6s in the 12s. Torque management definitely kicked in when he tried to do a burnout - I saw it. I don't know if it affected his launch. Some of these comments are getting downright silly. Cartek modified ZO6's run in the 10s. They don't have to make their mods "look good". 
I hope so! What about those of us with Z06's hoping to get NEAR Z06 performance (as has been stated by nearly everyone involved in the project) from a Z51 six-speed Corvette.
This thread is scaring me...
P.S. I know the servers are still being worked on, but we need all our emoticons!!!
Whatever... I do understand the guy not powershifting his brand new car. Heck, I don't powershift ANY of my cars...and of course, the ET's show.
http://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread...hlight=ls1+ls2
This is a z06 and ls2 overlay
http://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread...light=ls2+dyno
click for dyno
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=198796

http://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread...light=ls2+dyno
Last edited by lostpatrolman; Sep 6, 2004 at 08:22 PM.
Oh... and I don't put any stock in that LS2 vs. LS6 overlay. That's a really weak LS6 in that graph.

<---12.36 @ 116mph STOCK Z06, granny-shifting the crap out of it.
Last edited by WA 2 FST; Sep 6, 2004 at 08:44 PM.
The driver knows what he is doing. (he owns and drives two low 9 second cars)
The Torque Management system will soon be bypassed.
The car seemed to bod down on launch.
The was no "getting off the throttle" to make the future mods look better. Another C6 was running 13.0 at another track. (again, see the C6 sections on this forum)
There is no doubt the car will run much better. However, i bet this is what you can expect from the non-racer C6 drivers, lol. No need to fear the average C6 guy.
forgot to mention, he later ran 13.1 at 109.
Last edited by QuickVet; Sep 7, 2004 at 12:34 AM.














