When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
What are the inherent differences between a BB and SB of the same displacement, such as 454ci? I'm assuming the BB will breathe better and make more power with less effort. A large displacement SB I think of as a more radical engine, but what are the practical differences? Same torque, etc?
pick up the Nov. Car Craft, it has a great 454 BBC vs 454 SBC dyno compro!
i started out running sbc's and love them, now i'm a bbc guy because it's what i have laying around, but i if i had the dough i would be putting and 18 deg. Brodix headed 454 sbc in my car instead of the bbc.
One of the rags did a compro a few months ago on a 427 Ford FE vs/ a stroked 351W. If I remember correctly, the biggest factor seperating the two was longevity. The SB just had too much rod angularity so it wouldn't rev like the BB. The SB had more low end torque due to the longer stroke, but the BB smoked it due to it's ability to rev higher. Regardless of where your heart lies, the same physics that apply to Fords apply to Chevys.
a 454 sbc is rather impractical admittedly, but you look at more reasonable sbc such as the 427 to 434, you start getting into an area where you can get near bbc performance and as far as rev higher eh, you can take a 427 and 434 to 7 grand, not a measure Id take a lot of big blocks up to. I cant sit here and say youll EVER get the same HP and torque out of a sbc of ANY displacement that you will out of bbc, cuase you wont, but if you want a practical and easy installation, lightweight, durability, daily drivability and still stupid amounts of power, you can NEVER EVER go wrong with a hardcore sbc.
What are the inherent differences between a BB and SB of the same displacement, such as 454ci? I'm assuming the BB will breathe better and make more power with less effort. A large displacement SB I think of as a more radical engine, but what are the practical differences? Same torque, etc?
Thanks for sharing!
-=Boston!=-
Don't know much about SBs greater than 406, but since I have owned a BB shark and a now a own a SB shark I think I am qualified to answer here. The BB is more fun to drive IMO because it snaps your neck around and plants you in your seat much easier than the SB. The SB may have an advantage with less understeer, but if you really want a car that handles in the twisties, buy a porshe or C4-C6, not a 35 yr old vette. When the back barrels on the carb open up on the BB, it is as if all hell is breaking loose...with the SB, it sounds nice and accelerates briskly but your not shoved back in your seat much. A properly built SB holds its own at the track against the BB, but a BB with equal investment in upgrade dollars will always win. BTW, I never have taken any muscle car/vette I have owned to the track. I only go by seat of pants judgement. Hence this is why there is a 454 block on a stand in my garage awaiting installation.
The SB may have an advantage with less understeer, but if you really want a car that handles in the twisties, buy a porshe or C4-C6, not a 35 yr old vette.
I suppose youve never seen the suspension upgrades avaliabel for the 35 year old vettes that are out there. Youll get the same skid pad performace out of the 35 year old vette with the upgrades as you will out of a c5.
One practical consideration is cost. SB parts are less expensive than BB parts. One reason is SB is more common. Another reason is BB is more desireable. Personally I would spend the extra $$$
What are the inherent differences between a BB and SB of the same displacement, such as 454ci? I'm assuming the BB will breathe better and make more power with less effort. A large displacement SB I think of as a more radical engine, but what are the practical differences? Same torque, etc?
Thanks for sharing!
-=Boston!=-
Motorhead is right , the with equal inches of 454 ; the sb will have more torque at a lower rpm, because of the longer stroke .
I believe I would have to go the sb route if I didn't have any parts to start with. The sb will also have less rotating weight , which increases bearing life and of course lets the engine rev quicker.
One practical consideration is cost. SB parts are less expensive than BB parts. One reason is SB is more common. Another reason is BB is more desireable. Personally I would spend the extra $$$
You are right up to a point. But once you get into exotic SB's like 454's and 472 the price is the same if not HIGHER than than BB of the same displcement because you must purchase aftermarket blocks, massive heads, etc.
pick up the Nov. Car Craft, it has a great 454 BBC vs 454 SBC dyno compro!
i started out running sbc's and love them, now i'm a bbc guy because it's what i have laying around, but i if i had the dough i would be putting and 18 deg. Brodix headed 454 sbc in my car instead of the bbc.
Got it ,,, going to read it close But i lean to the small block
on a quick read
From: Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean people aren't out to get me...
St. Jude Donor '09
You're comparing apples to oranges. To be fair, if you stoke & bore a SB then you have to do the same to the BB. Otherwise you're just playing catch-up with the SB.
You're comparing apples to oranges. To be fair, if you stoke & bore a SB then you have to do the same to the BB. Otherwise you're just playing catch-up with the SB.
Motorhead is right , the with equal inches of 454 ; the sb will have more torque at a lower rpm, because of the longer stroke .
I believe I would have to go the sb route if I didn't have any parts to start with. The sb will also have less rotating weight , which increases bearing life and of course lets the engine rev quicker.
the bore and stroke of the new SBC 454s are the same as the stoke BBC 454, both are 4.25 bore x 4.0 stroke. the horse and torque curve on both motors would be made with the heads and cam. but you are right in the fact that the SBC would benifit from it's much light rotating weight.
to me the heads that the "Hard Core" sbc 454 are small (220cc), but the motors are built more for driving, thats why i said i would use a set of ported 18 deg Brodix heads if i built one.
I have both a 454 and a 406 sitting in my garage, but am going to go the 454 route because to get the 406 to the torque of the 454 I have to spend $1000 on heads. And it is also the mystique factor of having the BB in there that I like, not just the performance. It is cool to have the best engine that was available from the factory in there...just my opinion.
What are the inherent differences between a BB and SB of the same displacement, such as 454ci? I'm assuming the BB will breathe better and make more power with less effort. A large displacement SB I think of as a more radical engine, but what are the practical differences? Same torque, etc?
Thanks for sharing!
-=Boston!=-
Now saying that bigger is always better it must be understood that this would only apply where the same amount of $$$ are spent. The basic engine components and prices for both are almost the same. But you will always get more bang for your buck with the BB`s
the bore and stroke of the new SBC 454s are the same as the stoke BBC 454, both are 4.25 bore x 4.0 stroke. the horse and torque curve on both motors would be made with the heads and cam. but you are right in the fact that the SBC would benifit from it's much light rotating weight.
to me the heads that the "Hard Core" sbc 454 are small (220cc), but the motors are built more for driving, thats why i said i would use a set of ported 18 deg Brodix heads if i built one.
I thought the Dart & World blocks only went 2.200" . Guess I better check the new catalogs.
to me the heads that the "Hard Core" sbc 454 are small (220cc), but the motors are built more for driving, thats why i said i would use a set of ported 18 deg Brodix heads if i built one.
Not sure about them being larger than 2.200, but I do know you can get 227cc heads that will flow better than 320cfm intake and 230cfm on exhaust.....that should be enough.