When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I don't have a modern tech engine but I do have a ZF6 speed and soon will have a seriously updated suspension. Also have modern brakes and possibly a front steering rack&pinion (working on that). My oiling system is pretty high tech though
Rack and Pinion is NOT a C3 trait. Its awesome for driving and for running around in the corners, makes life hella easier, but again...just one of those things I wouldnt do to MY C3. I mean Im dumping some serious technology of the SBC into mine to create a 625hp engine that DOESNT use NOS or a Super, and Im also updating the suspension to the tune of almost 3 grand, brakes as well to the tune of 2200, a 200 4-r that can handle 800hp, and some majorly beefed up drivetrain components, but none of that changes the BASIC technology that is at the heart of a C3.
Anyways Im going to stop stepping on people's toes now.
Im an old timer...I like the IDEA that you can have a quasi-modern C3 without actually having to put in a 21st century drivetrain. When does a C3 STOP being a C3? Are we going stricly on body styling? Is there something more to it? I look at my cars philosophically, will it still be a C3 if I put in an engine, drivetrain, brake system from 2005? To me, no it wont be. You put in a normal small or big block, use the same but upgraded parts that bolt right on to a C3, then yes....but thats just my humble opinion.
Basically, my belief is a c3 is a c3 based on what it started out as. Screw the factory suspension, drivetrain, steering, brakes and all that other crap. Some of it was very special and unique for its day, but it was also a very long time ago and much better advancements have been made in the past 40 years or so. The notion that "I like the IDEA that you can have a quasi-modern C3 without actually having to put in a 21st century drivetrain" is mostly that, an IDEA. Anything that you can do the car now that doesnt use modern technology still isnt going to be stock, and could have been done back when the car was new, and probably was. So even if you modify the car using old school techniches, it still isnt a stock c3. Modified is modified, doesnt matter is you modify with parts that could have been obtained back in 70, or stuff that just came out. Besides, are you implying that a c3 is no longer a c3 when rack and pinion is added, Or how about a supercharger, Or even :gasp: an ls1 conversion?
Last edited by lostpatrolman; Oct 14, 2004 at 04:26 PM.
From: WAY DEEP INSIDE AMERICO,YES YOU LIVE HERE TO!! TX
Originally Posted by lostpatrolman
Basically, my belief is a c3 is a c3 based on what it started out as. Screw the factory suspension, drivetrain, steering, brakes and all that other crap. Some of it was very special and unique for its day, but it was also a very long time ago and much better advancements have been made in the past 40 years or so. The notion that "I like the IDEA that you can have a quasi-modern C3 without actually having to put in a 21st century drivetrain" is mostly that, an IDEA. Anything that you can do the car now that doesnt use modern technology still isnt going to be stock, and could have been done back when the car was new, and probably was. So even if you modify the car using old school techniches, it still isnt a stock c3. Modified is modified, doesnt matter is you modify with parts that could have been obtained back in 70, or stuff that just came out. Besides, are you implying that a c3 is no longer a c3 when rack and pinion is added, Or how about a supercharger, Or even :gasp: an ls1 conversion?
Rack and Pinion is NOT a C3 trait. Its awesome for driving and for running around in the corners, makes life hella easier, but again...just one of those things I wouldnt do to MY C3. I mean Im dumping some serious technology of the SBC into mine to create a 625hp engine that DOESNT use NOS or a Super, and Im also updating the suspension to the tune of almost 3 grand, brakes as well to the tune of 2200, a 200 4-r that can handle 800hp, and some majorly beefed up drivetrain components, but none of that changes the BASIC technology that is at the heart of a C3.
Anyways Im going to stop stepping on people's toes now.
What is the use of a 3 grand suspension & brakes and a souped up engine when the thing won't corner. I know people are now going to comment that the c3 is good at cornering and I don't want to argue but no it's not, it's a terrible car, toe oversteer in the rear, bump oversteer on the front...no need to go on, it isn't all that wonderful at all.
Anyone who doesnt want rack and pinion steering is missing out. No comparison to stock. If you get out of shape I like the response and quickness of the steering.As far as being a c3, I think they are all still c3s no matter what drivetrain or other mods have been upgraded. Who wants old technology when you can have modern with a classic bodystyle,best of both worlds.
Is it still a C3?
???
Depends on who you ask...I've got my Pace and love it more than my Z06, cuz it has CHARACTER. It's a completely different driving experience, and I love it.
...but would I want, say, a '72 appearing modern sport car that I can drive everyday with little maintenance?...is that a rheutorical question, 4377 sign me up!!! and I'll call it whatever you want!
I am in the middle of an LS-1 and 4L60e conversion. 6 sp would be too much of a pain in the traffic around here.
Check out carcreations.com, nice work.
Rack and Pinion is NOT a C3 trait. Its awesome for driving and for running around in the corners, makes life hella easier, but again...just one of those things I wouldnt do to MY C3. I mean Im dumping some serious technology of the SBC into mine to create a 625hp engine that DOESNT use NOS or a Super, and Im also updating the suspension to the tune of almost 3 grand, brakes as well to the tune of 2200, a 200 4-r that can handle 800hp, and some majorly beefed up drivetrain components, but none of that changes the BASIC technology that is at the heart of a C3.
Anyways Im going to stop stepping on people's toes now.
So if your dumping some serious "technology" into your small block then why cant someone dump some serious ''technology'' into their car by way of an LS1. I really dont see the difference in an LS1 compared to the motor you are going to build other than a computer and fuel injection. And what are you going to do to the suspension for 3k that available back in the day of these cars? I don't see how you can say some things are taking away from the C3 and others arent. A C3 didnt originally come with a 625hp motor, did it? This goes back to the whole ''keep it original'' battle but with a little added flair.
From: Arlington Va Current ride 04 vert, previous vettes: 69 vert, 77 resto mod
any way not to fuel the real C3/ fake C3 issue.... but i just saw at a local shop the new front end kit with a Mono spring and new A-arms installed on a C3 and.... it was awsome....I wish i had done that when i rebuilt my front end...... any way how can i get a Not Correctly Restored Stringay t-shirt to wear poudly or since i have a 77 am i left out of the Stingray club?? ...you couldn't be so lucky, emblems or not I voted my self in without asking
Last edited by bobs77vet; Oct 15, 2004 at 01:28 PM.
I have a friend who's got an ERA cobra replica...complete with a 427FE side-oiler. He built it himself. It's got a modern chassis, suspension, and brake system. It's basically a brand new car that happens to look like a '65 Cobra. A couple years after he built it, he got a chance to drive the real deal. He likes the ERA replica better. He said it has much better road manners and cooler footboxes. Sound familiar?