Are 78's "lemons"?
But all the replies were great! I like the look of the 78, and I hope to be able to drive it and crawl all over it next week. Thanks to all of you for your information...The 1978 Corvette was not a mechanical lemon, NOR was it considered a cosmetic lemon in popular opinion (you'll see that right away once you start driving it on the street by how much positive attention you will receive! It will blow your mind. You'll be a star in that car.), and it's low horsepower can easily be changed to give it the performance Duntov actually intended for it. Just be sure that '78's condition is up to snuff before you buy it. A straight rust free frame and rust free birdcage are a must. Anything else beyond that can be repaired or replaced if necessary. It's only a matter of money at that point. If you like the car, and it's worthy of you, GO FOR IT! And post pics. Good luck!!
I too will let the pic of my car speak for itself. Hey, it gives me a
every time I open the garage, and that's all that ultimately counts. If mrvette's '72 does the same for him, well, God bless 'em. Enjoy.

I'd sell two children for it.
GENE
Yeah you got a rise out of me momentarily. So what. At least your saying what you believe instead of being PC.
The 82 is a very dependable car, very reliable and absolutely the smoothest cruising C3 of them all. For highway cruising and good mileage you can't beat it. What makes some of them unreliable in the injection department is the fact that people worked on them that didn't know what they were doing, but that would do the same for other models. Don't just repeat what you heard, have you ever owned one? Mine always fired right up, ran smooth and was pretty fast also (I completely rebuilt the entire system, redid the wiring and synchronised the system till it was silk smooth)
Last edited by Corvette_fetish; Dec 22, 2004 at 04:41 PM.

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts





Don't think one would be enough.
I've never owned a Corvette. What's the scoop???
I'm sorry you had to read the war of words on the C3 forum. This normally does not happen, and 99.9% of the time everyone gets along very well.
One thing to consider when purchasing a vette is the emission laws in your state and county. As most everyone stated, you can mod any vette to any horsepower you want. It's just a matter of time and money. With that being said, if you were to purchase a 78 that was completely exempt from emissions and/or visual inspection you can go to town and make a 78 a very powerful car with no worries about emissions crap on your engine.
I have a 1980 convertible (custom) and love the body style. Then again, I truly enjoy the look of any year vette. Don't worry about the year as no one year was really much better than another as it relates to build quality. Decide on the style and budget you are most comfortable with. Then you have a family here at corvetteforum waiting to help you have fun with your new hobby. Good luck with your search. The hunt is as much fun as the kill
I've never owned a Corvette. What's the scoop???
You have a twin in Canada.

Really cool. That owner has great taste!!! There are more 80's verts out there than one would realize. These cars make great custom verts. Thanks for the pic Paul.





.
Maybe there's a market for these NOS GM original pop rivets?
you need to embed them back in the paint in order to keep it original....
But I have to disagree (freely & honestly!). Verts are great, but they aren't the only Vettes ever made. Some of us live in wet climates & Verts just ain't practical (ignoring the extra body flex of some verts, show me a vert that doesn't leak & I'll show you one that soon will, or needs lots of $$$'s spent to keep it water tight. It's bad enough keeping a coupe dry
).The FUGLY 'fastback' style was also championed by Italian & other stylists of the time & some very popular cars were of that design. Cars that were even smaller than C3's. Off the top of my head (where once there was lot of hair), popular & attractive fastback style cars include the MGB (the chrome bumper models, not the awful rubber bumper victim of US safety legislation), some other car called an "E" something & various other classics of vehicle design (and they wouldn't be classics if nobody liked them). It's just personal preference, but I far prefer my large expanse of rear glass to the notchback as I only need to glance in the rear view mirror to see what the score is behind me, whereas with a notchback I found I had to look a bit longer due to all the blind spots. Extra storage space isn't high on my list of priorities, but a far greater field of view is right up at the top of the list. It also looks well
IMHO, but whadda I know, I drive a buggy bumper Vette (where IS Dep? Surely he's got an input on this post!)
Fully agree with your view on Beetles (I'd go further but would lose a lot of points if I did). I also really didn't like what they did to the rear end of some Mopars, but other people really like them & I wouldn't criticise them for their choice of car (unless it was a Beetle or, even worse, that modern version of one - fugly fishtank on wheels).
On a more practical note (these supposed to be sports cars and all that), how does the fastback style compare aerodynamically to the earlier style? Shouldn't that be the type of point being discussed?
The really crucial thing, that nobody has mentioned, is that good judges of ugliness (women) like the fastback style & that's good enough for me

Merry Christmas all

OMFG that car is stunning - sell the kid sell the kid sell the kid!!
j/k of course. If you have a chance to buy that car then you need to!










