When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Ok I just sold a 94 6 speed so not very well versed in auto's. I have a good friend who is looking at a 94 auto with 89,000 miles. It is extremely clean car and looks to be VERY well maintained. I would love to get everyone's opinion on life expectancy of the auto and any problems he could expect with the auto with this kinda mileage.
The later the year the better the durability. 94 is a good, later year. It is electronic which makes for better durability. It does not have a governor so it uses map,tps and speed sensor inputs to activate solenoids for quick valve actuations. 100 to 150k in a properly maintained, street driven c-4 is not unusual.
I bought my 94 Auto in April of 2001 with 24K miles on it. Real clean, well maintained car. Put 4000 miles on it the first Summer. Then in Nov of 2001 while taking it out for the last ride of the year before garaging her for the Winter, the tranny went. Brought tears to my eyes seeing her on the trailer being taken to the shop. The owner of the trans shop said a valve stuck? Cost me $1000. No problems since then, only had to put a water pump in her 2 years ago.
That is the opposite of what I am implying. These transmissions often have a reputation for failing every few years. I am a believer in these units. I feel that any part that goes 100-150k is a good part. I would never expect a motor,trans or rear to last 200k in a high performance car. If it does go that far I feel the part owes me nothing. For the record my origional trans(87) went 235k before I broke it. This is the exception rather than the rule. Some guys have had failures with less than 60k. I also feel that these are the exception.
Also, transmissions contain a band and many clutch plates. These have a wear surface similar to a brake pad or clutch lining. A typical plate is .060 thick. .040 is the center, and each side contains.010 of wear surface. I cannot believe this lining holds up for more than ten miles much less 100k. Heat is the big factor. The rubber lip seals get hard from heat. 1 little crack in a lip seal causes a failure in the hydralic circuit. Then the trans fails.
There's one school of thought that says if your transmission has gone for many miles without changing the fluid, leaving it alone is safest. I've had my 95 since only last summer, so I have no way of knowing for sure whether it's been done or not. I'm torn!
I consider a modern engine or tranny that doesn't make it to 200k with proper maintenance to be a POS. But then I'm not used to American cars.
I did make my post to argue the quality of american vs import. I made it to reassure the guy who started the thread that the quality"In My Opinion" was quite good for his make and model. I meant no disrespect to what ever vehicle you have that gives you pleasure. If I have a vehicle of any year, make or model go 150K "I" feel it owes me nothing. Your opinion obviously disagrees with mine. I don't feel the need to beat this horse. Hopefully others will chime in with their opinion. I have expressed mine sufficiently.
My Tranny has 155k on it just flushed and filtered had a lot of gunk on the magnet but it works just fine. I added Lucas tranny treatment to it and it runs a lot better than before used to shift pretty hard now it feels just right.
thanks everyone for the replys. From what I am hearing the automatic should be good for quite some time with a good flush and fluid change. I really appreciate all the comments and thoughts.
From: Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die
St. Jude Donor '04-'05-'06-'07
Originally Posted by VFR750
There's one school of thought that says if your transmission has gone for many miles without changing the fluid, leaving it alone is safest. I've had my 95 since only last summer, so I have no way of knowing for sure whether it's been done or not. I'm torn!
I've heard this theory bantered around for all of the 30+ years I've been working on vehicles professionally. I've never bought into it nor do I have any personal experience that would verify it. If you change your fluid and your transmission conks out a week later, it was going to puke anyway, in my opinion. My fluid was disgusting when I bought my car at 81K mkiles but the transmission worked well so I took the chance. I did a flush and then a filter change going to B&M's synthetic Trick Shift. I installed a B&M Shift Plus which is an electronic shift kit. I'm now making significantly more HP and torque than stock and it still works well at 103K miles. If it croaks tomorrow, I'll say,"Oh well." and build it back to take more power than I'm making. I flog it and enjoy it and if something breaks, I'll make it better.