C4 General Discussion General C4 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech

Most poorly designed object on C4!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 11:50 AM
  #101  
5speedC4's Avatar
5speedC4
Drifting
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 3
From: Lowell Arkansas
Default

Originally Posted by Greg Gore
OK... Let's pretend you are all mechanical engineers for the moment.

Tell me what you would do differently to fix the things you have complained about. Don't forget the car has to meet target weight and performance goals and has to sell for whatever the one you are complaining about sold for when new.

The high frame rails were necessary to produce a stiff frame with the roof removed or you would have complained about Honda Civics beating you through the turns at the local autocross. The roof is bolted in to stiffen the frame even more. Want latches? Buy a Miata.

Optispark has greater timing resolution and accuracy than anything else available at the time which was partly responsible for making 10:1 compression available again. Accuracy comes from unique square wave output which magnetic trigger cannot do. Want reliable Opti? Hose the car all you want, just leave the engine alone. Your buddies won't notice dust on the valve covers anyway. Didn't hear anyone complain about the waterpump, why not? If waterpump was better you guys wouldn't be talking about the Opti so much. Besides, waterpump is driven off the cam, You lose your belt and you get to still drive home, not a bad feature to have.

Plastic parts: Plastic is a clever way to produce a good looking part to perform a function without incurring a weight penalty. I didn't hear anyone complain about Corvette's competitive weight. Want a tank? buy from a competitor.

Ok Mr. Gore............

You seem to be smarter than the average bear.

Maybe you can explain the reasoning behind:

The inexcusable way in which the tail lights were designed in the early C4.

It makes a simple chore; like changing the bulbs in the tail light, into a terrible experience. You end up scratching and bruising your forearms. It also takes much longer than it should.
Why in the world would anyone design a tail light in such a way?
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 12:39 PM
  #102  
Matt Cramer's Avatar
Matt Cramer
Instructor
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 230
Likes: 1
From: Covington GA
Default

Originally Posted by Greg Gore
OK... Let's pretend you are all mechanical engineers for the moment.

Tell me what you would do differently to fix the things you have complained about. Don't forget the car has to meet target weight and performance goals and has to sell for whatever the one you are complaining about sold for when new.
I love second guessing the factory, so I'll play along on some of them. I won't go after the tall sills / frame rails, though - I once started a design of a kit car that was exactly that way for torsional rigidity.

Optispark has greater timing resolution and accuracy than anything else available at the time which was partly responsible for making 10:1 compression available again. Accuracy comes from unique square wave output which magnetic trigger cannot do. Want reliable Opti? Hose the car all you want, just leave the engine alone. Your buddies won't notice dust on the valve covers anyway. Didn't hear anyone complain about the waterpump, why not? If waterpump was better you guys wouldn't be talking about the Opti so much. Besides, waterpump is driven off the cam, You lose your belt and you get to still drive home, not a bad feature to have.
I'm not sure I buy the resolution arguement for the Optispark. The LS1 doesn't use that kind of resolution. Neither did the Bosch Motronic systems used in European market GM products at the time - they used a 58 toothed crank trigger and magnetic sensor. And this worked for BMW M cars that ran more RPM and compression than a LT1.

I'd probably have removed the distributor altogether at this point. Remember, at this point even Luminas and Cavaliers had distributorless ignitions. Perhaps they could have used the system they put on the Northstar.

Last edited by Matt Cramer; Oct 16, 2007 at 12:42 PM.
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 12:43 PM
  #103  
Matt Cramer's Avatar
Matt Cramer
Instructor
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 230
Likes: 1
From: Covington GA
Default

Originally Posted by jrp
Yours is not broken. It goes down to stay out of your way when you get out of the car.
Thanks for clearing that up. I still think it's a bad idea to design it to operate in a way that doesn't match what the user expects. My guess was that at the time most of the expensive European sports cars put the handbrake there, so GM figured they'd put it there too to make it look more like a Porsche.
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 12:51 PM
  #104  
Greg Gore's Avatar
Greg Gore
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,841
Likes: 19
From: CLT, North Carolina
Default

The engineers job is to produce something the marketing people want, test and perform all the tweaks to make it work properly and it get it to meet all the requirements. Packaging engineers then get involved with getting it to fit whatever space is available in the car and while meeting certain appearance goals too and of course all this has to be brought in within budget constraints. In the case of tail lights the bumper reinforcements and energy absorbing parts share space with those parts behind the bumper cover along with room for a cargo area within a budget. I would say ease in servicing tail light bulbs while important was a lower goal than how the car looks, what it weighs and what the cost to produce it was. Corvettes are admittedely not the easiest cars to work on and lots of things on a Corvette are hard to get at. If you have ever had the dash out of one you would see the packaging engineers have made use of every ounce of available space; it's very tight in there. It is much easier to be a rolls Royce engineer; you just spend whatever is needed to go get the best of everything but it is an entirely different thing to be a good Ford or Chevy engineer. You are still expected to do a good job but now you have to get it done at a low cost.
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 12:59 PM
  #105  
Greg Gore's Avatar
Greg Gore
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,841
Likes: 19
From: CLT, North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by Matt Cramer
I love second guessing the factory, so I'll play along on some of them. I won't go after the tall sills / frame rails, though - I once started a design of a kit car that was exactly that way for torsional rigidity.



I'm not sure I buy the resolution arguement for the Optispark. The LS1 doesn't use that kind of resolution. Neither did the Bosch Motronic systems used in European market GM products at the time - they used a 58 toothed crank trigger and magnetic sensor. And this worked for BMW M cars that ran more RPM and compression than a LT1.

I'd probably have removed the distributor altogether at this point. Remember, at this point even Luminas and Cavaliers had distributorless ignitions. Perhaps they could have used the system they put on the Northstar.
Magnetic triggers produce a sine wave output. Where on the sine curve should the computer recognize data input? Later systems utilize hysteresis correction to synthesize a square wave signal. The Opti was admittedly interim technology but it is interesting to note it is still being sold today as an advantage. Crane has a new optical sensor distributor on the market for high performance applications and the advertising is touting the accuracy of the square wave output. Only problem is they had to make it compatible with MSD boxes lots of folks run so the distributor corrects the square wave signal to a sine wave! Funny stuff!!
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 01:01 PM
  #106  
Greg Gore's Avatar
Greg Gore
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,841
Likes: 19
From: CLT, North Carolina
Default

I guess if you end up not liking the C4 there's always the C5 (or C6).
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 01:22 PM
  #107  
Demonic85's Avatar
Demonic85
Team Owner
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 24,460
Likes: 7
From: sw Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by Matt Cramer


I'm not sure I buy the resolution arguement for the Optispark. The LS1 doesn't use that kind of resolution. Neither did the Bosch Motronic systems used in European market GM products at the time - they used a 58 toothed crank trigger and magnetic sensor. And this worked for BMW M cars that ran more RPM and compression than a LT1.
You're absolutely right, in fact GM used distributor less ignition in the late '80s as well. My '87 Buick Lesabre had one with a crank trigger. It's design is very similar to the one on the LS1, but it had only 3 coils, 2 plugs per coil. I dont know of any other manufacturer that used something like the Opti.
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 01:25 PM
  #108  
Greg Gore's Avatar
Greg Gore
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,841
Likes: 19
From: CLT, North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by 4Ever21
You're absolutely right, in fact GM used distributor less ignition in the late '80s as well. My '87 Buick Lesabre had one with a crank trigger. It's design is very similar to the one on the LS1, but it had only 3 coils, 2 plugs per coil. I dont know of any other manufacturer that used something like the Opti.
It's still a magnetic trigger that produces a sine wave. Opti is not a magnetic trigger and does not produce a sine wave.
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 02:27 PM
  #109  
Matt Cramer's Avatar
Matt Cramer
Instructor
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 230
Likes: 1
From: Covington GA
Default

Originally Posted by Greg Gore
Magnetic triggers produce a sine wave output. Where on the sine curve should the computer recognize data input? Later systems utilize hysteresis correction to synthesize a square wave signal.
Many systems trigger off the point where the sine wave crosses zero; this doesn't move around very much with RPM. The Bosch Motronic systems supposedly can trigger off the leading and trailing edge of each tooth, but how they do this is beyond me.

But if you want to make the sine wave go away and replace it with a square wave, you can use a Hall effect sensor instead of an inductive one. These are still magnetic - and can still be made waterproof - but generate a square wave that looks just like the output from an optical sensor.

In fact, the Buick C3I ignitions from the mid '80s used Hall effect sensors that generated square waves instead of sine waves. Here's a picture that was to show GM techs what waveform to look for on something like that Buick Century:



Originally Posted by 4Ever21
I dont know of any other manufacturer that used something like the Opti.
No other domestic manufacturer did this, but it's pretty similar to designs in the import world. The Opti was built by Mitsubishi, and similar versions appear on Mitsubishi, Nissan, and Mazda motors. The Nissan triggers come closest - they have the same 360 slot outer ring. But GM was the only one who put it behind the water pump.

Last edited by Matt Cramer; Oct 16, 2007 at 02:33 PM.
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 03:07 PM
  #110  
erd90vettesc's Avatar
erd90vettesc
Advanced
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Greenville SC
Default

The thing I dislike most about my car is the fact that parts like wheel bearings are crazy expensive compared to other cars with very similar designs. Other than the expense of maintainence which my car has been exceptionally reliable I love it.
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 04:39 PM
  #111  
Chapindad's Avatar
Chapindad
Racer
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Chapin South Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by 5speedC4
I have a1988 L98 car.

Pretty trouble free car.

I guess the tail light bulb replacement has me scratching my head as to .......why, why, why did they do that?
I AGREE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 05:28 PM
  #112  
redwing76's Avatar
redwing76
Le Mans Master
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 6,715
Likes: 2
From: Santa Teresa New Mexico
Default

Originally Posted by Matt Cramer
Many systems trigger off the point where the sine wave crosses zero; this doesn't move around very much with RPM. The Bosch Motronic systems supposedly can trigger off the leading and trailing edge of each tooth, but how they do this is beyond me.

But if you want to make the sine wave go away and replace it with a square wave, you can use a Hall effect sensor instead of an inductive one. These are still magnetic - and can still be made waterproof - but generate a square wave that looks just like the output from an optical sensor.

In fact, the Buick C3I ignitions from the mid '80s used Hall effect sensors that generated square waves instead of sine waves. Here's a picture that was to show GM techs what waveform to look for on something like that Buick Century:





No other domestic manufacturer did this, but it's pretty similar to designs in the import world. The Opti was built by Mitsubishi, and similar versions appear on Mitsubishi, Nissan, and Mazda motors. The Nissan triggers come closest - they have the same 360 slot outer ring. But GM was the only one who put it behind the water pump.
Well, it was a really stupid design that ruined a really good car for 4 years. It is one of the major weak points in the late model C4 if not the only major weak point.
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 05:32 PM
  #113  
Greg Gore's Avatar
Greg Gore
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,841
Likes: 19
From: CLT, North Carolina
Default

It's a good system and I like mine.
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 07:51 PM
  #114  
hexane's Avatar
hexane
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 2
From: Kathleen FL
Default

On the flip side, I think the bread box in the early C4s is pretty well designed as a stress reliever. Durable indeed! Each time I'm frustrated about something breaking, I just bang my head repeatedly on the bread box and the stress goes away.
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 09:00 PM
  #115  
5speedC4's Avatar
5speedC4
Drifting
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 3
From: Lowell Arkansas
Default

Originally Posted by Greg Gore
It's a good system and I like mine.
Greg

I just read your profile.

Yep........like I said.........smarter than the average bear.

Still, I would like you to acknowledge that the early C4 tail lights could have been easily designed, to be much easier to change the bulbs in, while still looking good.

If you don't agree with me, then I guess you had a hand in designing the darn things.
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 09:29 PM
  #116  
Greg Gore's Avatar
Greg Gore
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,841
Likes: 19
From: CLT, North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by 5speedC4
Greg

I just read your profile.

Yep........like I said.........smarter than the average bear.

Still, I would like you to acknowledge that the early C4 tail lights could have been easily designed, to be much easier to change the bulbs in, while still looking good.

If you don't agree with me, then I guess you had a hand in designing the darn things.
No, I didn't have a hand in designing them but I can see your point. I guess there are compromises and faults with nearly every design. I don't have a C6 yet but was at the Carlisle show this past August in the flea market where I met a guy negotiating to buy a $1200 dollar headlight for an 05. I guess when the current crop of C4 owners graduate to a C6 Opti will be off the hook and $1200 C6 plastic headlights will be on the hotseat.
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 10:21 PM
  #117  
Mekanic's Avatar
Mekanic
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 3
From: In a van down by the river! Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Matt Cramer
One offender that I haven't seen mentioned: The parking brake handle that goes back down when you set the parking brake. At least mine does. I'm still trying to figure out if this was by design or if it's broken. I keep forgetting if it's set because it doesn't stay up like a handbrake should
if it stayed up, you wouldnt be able to get in or out of the car.

Originally Posted by Greg Gore
OK... Let's pretend you are all mechanical engineers for the moment.

Tell me what you would do differently to fix the things you have complained about. Don't forget the car has to meet target weight and performance goals and has to sell for whatever the one you are complaining about sold for when new.

The high frame rails were necessary to produce a stiff frame with the roof removed or you would have complained about Honda Civics beating you through the turns at the local autocross. The roof is bolted in to stiffen the frame even more. Want latches? Buy a Miata.

Optispark has greater timing resolution and accuracy than anything else available at the time which was partly responsible for making 10:1 compression available again. Accuracy comes from unique square wave output which magnetic trigger cannot do. Want reliable Opti? Hose the car all you want, just leave the engine alone. Your buddies won't notice dust on the valve covers anyway. Didn't hear anyone complain about the waterpump, why not? If waterpump was better you guys wouldn't be talking about the Opti so much. Besides, waterpump is driven off the cam, You lose your belt and you get to still drive home, not a bad feature to have.

Plastic parts: Plastic is a clever way to produce a good looking part to perform a function without incurring a weight penalty. I didn't hear anyone complain about Corvette's competitive weight. Want a tank? buy from a competitor.
Great post Greg.

Shade clips. Yeah they suck. $15 fix.

High door sils: WTF are you kidding me? thats like my favorite part of my car, go buy a buick.

Opti: What greg said. Mine is at almost 90k with no problems.

Bolts for the targa: Buy a vert, I would rather tear my face off around the corners.

Battery Location: where would you suggest it be put?

Leather: by a lexus

Door panels: yeah, they get floppy, I replaced mine, 12 year old car.

I mean cmon, Half of these complaints tell me you either A: don't need a Corvette, or B: you don't need an older car.

People complaining about opti would probably have their eyes explode when trying to replace and adjust points and a condenser.

Get notified of new replies

To Most poorly designed object on C4!

Old Oct 16, 2007 | 10:42 PM
  #118  
Scootin_Z's Avatar
Scootin_Z
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 826
Likes: 22
From: Chicago Area
Default

Originally Posted by Mekanic

High door sils: WTF are you kidding me? thats like my favorite part of my car, go buy a buick.
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 11:16 PM
  #119  
tonymax2's Avatar
tonymax2
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 1
From: MidOhio
Default

Originally Posted by chris3558
I would have to say the tall frame rails that you have to physicly lift your foot up and over everytime you get in and out of the car. I can't imagine for a older person trying to make this a daily driver. What was GM thinking???? I realize that their budget got cut early in the developement stages, but what the heck! Oh well, I bought one anyways.
You're getting warm but the high door sills were a required result when Lloyd Reuss, then Chevy Gen Mngr "declared" that the C4 would be a targa top without the intended center tie bar under a one-piece roof panel. That one stupid, cosmetic decision caused the sill problem, the "shake-rattle-roll" without the top in place and the cracking of both the "glass" and the solid tops. If anyone ought to be burned in effigy at C4 rallies, it should be Reuss. He single-handedly screwed-up a whole generation of 'vettes.
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 03:16 AM
  #120  
skeet's Avatar
skeet
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,491
Likes: 1
From: prescott AZ
Default

Screws not holding the tail light lens on ( early C4's)-anyone who has had to change a tail light bulb knows what I mean.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:22 AM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE