When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I was looking through a Ecklers magazine and see they are selling a B&M 6 speed ripper shifter for the 89-96 C4's that reduces shifter throws by 40% (269.99). They also sell a Hurst shifter kit for the 89-96 (199.99). Just wondering why on Gods green earth someone would pay, especially that much, for something they can do with the stock shifter other than it's made of pretty aluminum or chrome? Enlighten me.
Last edited by RRT vette; Jul 9, 2007 at 11:49 AM.
Well, if you believe the advertizing mumbo-jumbo, shorter shifting distance = shorter time between shifts = faster acceleration. Probably true, but to a very small extent.
If you ask me, it's all about the driving experience. They not only shorten the shift, but most of them make it firmer as well (less wiggle room when in gear, if you know what I mean). If having a more precise-feeling shifter is worth $200, then it's a good deal. If not, don't get one. Personally, I'm all for them. The most important upgrades to a car are the ones you actually engage.
The difference between a stock shifter and a short throw are monumental. I went from a stock 93 Mustang GT shifter to a B&M short throw and it was like night and day. I loved it. It definitely firms up the shifts and the distance and time to shift was noticeably shortened.
It will be the best mod you ever did! That's why. It will make shifting the car feel like it should have felt from the factory. The shorter throw makes it much firmer and solid. In addition, if you do any power shifting..you will never miss a gear!
I bought the Hurst too, but haven't had a chance to install it yet. I found the stock shifter to be pretty flabby, with long throws. From what I've read, the Hurst should make for more enjoyable driving.
I agree, mostly, with the above comments. I installed the Hurst and it is tighter, shorter, more "positive," etc. It is also easier to select reverse without the lockup.
Two downsides:
o It is a major PITA to install
o Surprisingly, absence of reverse lockout can make shifting into 5th a bit imprecise
On balance, worth doing
Last edited by Rapid Fred; Jul 9, 2007 at 09:26 AM.
From the looks of the instructions, it appears that the biggest PITA is dropping the exhaust system to gain access. I've heard other folks say that it's a good time to change the fuel filter while you're in there.
The shifter install in my car is truly one of the best things that I did. I installed the B&M over the Hurst simply by test driving a buddies GS with the B&M and another buddies ZR-1 with the Hurst. In my opinion I noticed that the B&M was the one to go with simply due to my own taste. Both shifters are great; some love the Ripper and some love the Hurst. If you ever have the opportunity, drive both (which shouldn't be too hard to do), and make your decision. Best of Luck!
I was looking through a Ecklers magazine and see they are selling a B&M 6 speed ripper shifter for the 89-96 C4's that reduces shifter throws by 40% (269.99). They also sell a Hurst shifter kit for the 89-96 (199.99). Just wondering why on Gods green earch someone would pay, especially that much, for something they can do with the stock shifter other than it's made of pretty aluminum or chrome? Enlighten me.
One could expand that and say why drive a vette when a civic or camry will get you where you want to go. Id say a Vette is more fun, and the short throw adds to the fun.
Night & day difference in feel over the stock shifter. I too tried both the B&M and the Hurst (ZFDoc had cars w/ both @ his place) and found the B&M more to my liking. To me, the Hurst felt more like the stock shifter, just w/ shorter throws...the B&M, on the other hand, has even shorter throws than the Hurst and a notchy, race car feel that I really like.
FWIW...You can get then B&M from Jegs for $199 and the Hurst for $129.
From: San Diego , CA Double Yellow DirtBags 1985..Z51..6-speed
I thought the install was a pain in the ***. I did it without dropping exhaust though, that made it more difficult. But instantly worth the trouble after driving it.
Shortening the stock shifter won't work as well. The Hurst shortens the part above the pivot, and lengthens the part below the pivot.
So you get a shifter that is only 1.35" lower, but a full 28% shorter throw. If you shortened the top of the stock shifter by 28%, it'd be buried in the console plate.