When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Now re-do your math with a 3.36 rear end (which is what the C&D test car had in 1966 when it ran the quarter in 12.8sec) and with 3.08 rear end which was available with the 425/435HP cars. You will find the top end with a 3.36 to be about 155 and its over 170MPH with the 3.08.
I'll agree with you on that. But the guy was taking about the 4.11 rear gear. So, that is the only part we were questioning.
Originally Posted by Shaf1970
As per a Sports Car Graphic road test of a 1966 427/425 with a 4.11 rear its 140mph. I think the standard rear was a 3.36 w/427's. They do get light in the front over 120-130.
I'll agree with you on that. But the guy was taking about the 4.11 rear gear. So, that is the only part we were questioning.
Originally Posted by Shaf1970
My fathers 327/365 with a 4.11 was over 140 a bit into the redline.
As Rolla says his numbers are dependent on rear tire size and also on 4th gear being a 1:1 ratio, no overdrive. Larger diameter rears change the numbers.
The accuracy of the speedometer also comes into play unless there was timing equipment involved.
As Rolla says his numbers are dependent on rear tire size and also on 4th gear being a 1:1 ratio, no overdrive. Larger diameter rears change the numbers.
The accuracy of the speedometer also comes into play unless there was timing equipment involved.
Yes and I agree, but the math matched the tire size, speedo and tach in my fathers case.
1. The standard rear in the 66/67 425/435 HP engines was 3.55, not 3.36. There were different standard rears depending on engine/transmission combination.
2. It was not unusual for solid lifter big blocks to hit 7200 RPM. This is how a 4.11 rear end car could get to 140. A cam, improved valve springs, a three angle valve job, and strengthened con rods (the weak point in stock BBs) can easily allow for 7500RPM utilization.
3. A quick note on areo for the C2. The L88 at LeMans in 1967 was able to hit those speeds without a front spoiler. C2 cars also had better aerodynamics than the follow-on C3s (though the 80-82 series did have markedly better areodynamics than the earlier cars).
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.