Plastic intake


The problem with the TPI is that it is too maintenance challenged and was designed for a 305 ci engine.
The intake is too modular.
1. It removes the water from the engine.
2. It holds the fuel system, injectors, fuel rail, regulator,
3. It holds the distributor in place.
4. it holds the EGR and passages
5. The manifold has 4 major parts
6. The fasteners to the assembly are hard to get to
7. The wiring for the manifold is cumbersome
8. The fuel lines are difficult to access
9. The manifold is prone to vacuum leaks
10. The manifold is not easily adaptable.
The Lt engines are not all that much better. The optispark is the trade off for an easier maintained intake.
I know, the Gen 1 is dead, and the current engineering push is to the LS engine.
But there are about 50 million Gen 1 engines out there with about 2 million of them in performance oriented vehicles, and maybe 500,000 of the owners might buy a better manifold.
Wonder if you could make money on that?
http://www.airflowresearch.com/index.php?cPath=79_81
I don't think you'll find enough market to cover the R&D for a TPI/LT1 intake, but that's just IMHO..
You could probably adapt the AFR intake for a 4V throttle body if you can manage to get injector bungs incorporated into the composite ?


http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/tp...ruction-4.html
He was looking at composite material at first but I believe it was just too difficult.
Last edited by Corvette40; Aug 27, 2012 at 10:00 PM.
Patent, CARB cert BIG BUX!
Noone would touch that for fear of heat related failures.
Plus imo to make it profitable dont think anyone woulda paid the asking price. Big ri$k to the mfr plus a few mos later some co would have them cast in China then you go under





