When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
ain't none
well, at least what I have found out/searched for/heard about.
apparently the mfg'er stopped producing them and no other company has stepped in to produce.
but, let us all know what you find out in today's world as you search
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (appearance mods)
C4 of Year Winner (appearance mods) 2019
I believe Bill @ ZFDoc has a fix for that but requires the unit to do the procedure. No idea how expensive. The procedure has something to do with bearing tolerance....I think.
I will say blue-printed units from Bill are reported to be (even more) bulletproof than the already sturdy ZF6.
To the OP:
I noticed PowerTorqueSystems has resurfaced DMFs on their website -- though I've yet to read of anyone here using one. No idea if there's really any availability either.
From time-to-time, I have seen one/two resurfaced units posted around.
Hmmm...being more of a motorcycle guy I had never heard of a dual-mass flywheel, and had to look it up. It seems strange that GM engineers went to this Rube Goldbergian contraption instead of an electronic limiter on the engine's torque output to keep stress on driveline components within limits. I can't imagine that an algorithm involving torque/rpm/traction would be too difficult for the CPU to handle.
Of course I'm not hampered by a knowledge of the subject. Which means my qualifications as an instant interwebs expert are perfectly in order.
Hmmm...being more of a motorcycle guy I had never heard of a dual-mass flywheel, and had to look it up. It seems strange that GM engineers went to this Rube Goldbergian contraption instead of an electronic limiter on the engine's torque output to keep stress on driveline components within limits. I can't imagine that an algorithm involving torque/rpm/traction would be too difficult for the CPU to handle.
Of course I'm not hampered by a knowledge of the subject. Which means my qualifications as an instant interwebs expert are perfectly in order.
The problem isn't caused by engine torque, per se. The problem is caused by the shallow helical angle of the gears in the ZF box. Low-RPM combustion impulses (especially at idle) cause nasty gear-rattle in the ZF box. GM was able to solve this problem with the dual-mass flywheel, which damps the impulses before they reach the ZF's input shaft. Installing a single-mass flywheel, especially one with a low mass, couples these impulses straight through to the input shaft, and the resultant gear rattle is exactly what the DM was employed to eliminate.
FWIW, I installed an extra-mass billet steel flywheel from Spec, along with a Spec stage 2 sprung-hub clutch kit in my '94, and have only minimal gear rattle. I can only hear it when the windows and ragtop are up, and nobody else has even noticed or commented on it. In this car, it's only barely audible over the Corsa exhaust. The fact that the blue-tag ZF in my car, with its slightly steeper helical angles, is somewhat less prone to this problem probably helped a bit in my case. Different gear oils might also affect the results.
Its a performance car its gonna make some kind of noise;plus its practically sitting right in your lap lol.
If Gm didnt build strength into these but were whisper quiet then people would complain they break all the time. Ugh.
Ive driven a number of C4s with the aluminum flywheel and hated it every time.
That's what my engine installer says, but the rattling wears on you, it's a different kind of annoyance, like water-boarding, you know ya ain't gonna die, but, it sure is uncomfortable.
That said there's plenty of faster cars that don't rattle; since they don't make the dual mass anymore, the noise is here to stay, spec put out a 28 lb single mass a year ago, the 22lb steel one didn't help, god be with you on the aluminum
Its hard to imagine that GM picked a tranny that required a "fix" before it could be used.
The link is for a ZR1 car....it's different.
GM picked the ZF because it was THE ONLY 6-spd available at the time of the C4 ZR1 inception. It was their only option if they wanted to fit the ZR1 with a 6 speed -- unless they wanted to delay production at least another year.
Getting into a stick C4 (or even auto) can be disappointing the first time. Some people consider it the halo of GM cars and expect perfection. It's not a Caddy, it's a car built for performance, break-thru aerodynamics, and even performance/emissions (for that era).
Some people consider it the halo of GM cars and expect perfection. It's not a Caddy, it's a car built for performance, break-thru aerodynamics, and even performance/emissions (for that era).
Which raises another (non-DM flywheel) question: exactly what target was GM aiming at with the C4 Corvette? It's not really a sports car in the traditional, stripped-down-for-performance sense since it has a lot of Cadillac-style amenities and features; but at the same time the harsh ride and contort-to-enter ergos fall short of luxury accommodations.
Is it the first hybrid? Instead of Corvette (a small warship!) maybe GM should have named it the Chimera -- half human and half beast.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.