When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Yeaj, it's a silly ebay posting, not to mention that it doesn't specify which Corvette. But, in the interests of fairness & accuracy, stock to stock, a 1987 328GTS would walk away from any L98 at any speed over 40mph or thereabouts..............& the margin would only get larger as the speed increased.
what do you base that on , their 1/4 mile times were in the 14's
I base it on the simple fact that 328s were slightly lighter than a L98, had more power than any L98, & breathed a helluva lot better than any L98. Therefore once you get past the low end torque advantage of the L98, it would be advantage 328. So once you get past 40, or at the most 50mph, the 328 would catch & then pull away slowly. Beyond 90mph the 328 would just gallop away.
Once again we are talking stock to stock.
A friend of mine bought a Ferrari 308 (he actually traded a '67 435 HP 427 Corvette for it). The maintenance was a nightmare. He said they had to take off the four Weber carburetors to get the valve covers off to adjust the valves.
The torque curve is really peaky. Nothing happens at the low end (or the midrange, for that matter). My buddy told me his 308 would go 150 MPH, but it took FOREVER to get there.
Don't get too far from a Ferrari dealership. Bubba won't know what to do with it if it breaks down out in the middle of nowhere.
Last edited by Cliff Harris; Mar 11, 2014 at 03:24 AM.
Corvette Stories
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)
Joe Kucinski
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!
Brett Foote
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know
Joe Kucinski
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2
Michael S. Palmer
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor
Joe Kucinski
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!
Joe Kucinski
5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!
A friend of mine bought a Ferrari 308 (he actually traded a '67 435 HP 427 Corvette for it). The maintenance was a nightmare. He said they had to take off the four Weber carburetors to get the valve covers off to adjust the valves.
The torque curve is really peaky. Nothing happens at the low end (or the midrange, for that matter). My buddy told me his 308 would go 150 MPH, but it took FOREVER to get there.
Don't get too far from a Ferrari dealership. Bubba won't know what to do with it if it breaks down out in the middle of nowhere.
Very interesting................except we're not actually talking about a late 70's 308 ;like your buddies ,........... We're talking about a 1987 328. Pretty big difference, since late 70s 308s would have their hands full with some Honda Civics on the low end acceleration race. I've driven 308s & 328s & though the official HP ratings are not that dramatically dissimilar, 20-25 hp, the reality is.
BTW, on a 328 there would be no carbs. There still isn't that much low end, but there is a lot more midrange.
Anyone else got a headache after trying to read that Godawful writeup? Round where I live there's more Ferrari's than Vettes, its always gonna be my ol' C4 that turns the heads
14+ second quarter and 0-100kph in 6+ seconds - that thing ain't killin' nothin' -
0-60 in 5.5, 1/4 mile in 14
Well I don't know. I'm thinking it would "kill" every American car built between 1976 & 1989, every Japanese car built before 1990 & I'm sure I can come up with more.
For 64K is sure as hell "should" be, but I'd say it's anything but a killer, even less at the price point difference. Put them on a track/autocross and torque wins all day long...unless it's the Nurburgring Nordschleife. With that, it's still a cool car if you can afford the yearly maintenance that is probably more than purchasing a running C4.
Well I don't know. I'm thinking it would "kill" every American car built between 1976 & 1991, every Japanese car built before 1990 & I'm sure I can come up with more.
For 64K is sure as hell "should" be, but I'd say it's anything but a killer, even less at the price point difference. Put them on a track/autocross and torque wins all day long...unless it's the Nurburgring Nordschleife. With that, it's still a cool car if you can afford the yearly maintenance that is probably more than purchasing a running C4.