1984 c4
Any help or advice is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Rod





Last edited by ls777z; Dec 16, 2018 at 06:39 AM.
Now, to get the most fun out of the car, and get most of your money back. What ever car you buy do as many repairs as you can do yourself using good quality (read cheap) OEM parts that you source from Ebay, CraigsList or Corvette forum members. Get a FSM (Field service manual) as that will save you big bucks.
Any help or advice is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Rod
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
If it were me, I'd buy it and do an LS/T56 swap, paint it, strip out most of the interior and put in a modern LCD dash (to go with a modern aftermarket EFI system), gussy up the paint, have fun upgrading the suspension, and have fun with it in autocross and time trial competition. Note that resale would be nowhere in my plans. It's a useful starting point for a fun project, though.






If it were me, I'd buy it and do an LS/T56 swap, paint it, strip out most of the interior and put in a modern LCD dash (to go with a modern aftermarket EFI system), gussy up the paint, have fun upgrading the suspension, and have fun with it in autocross and time trial competition. Note that resale would be nowhere in my plans. It's a useful starting point for a fun project, though.






Any help or advice is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Rod
Just the interior
New seats with foam $900
Fix speedo / dash $250 min
Sending unit $120
dash pad $425
Steering wheel $125
carpet $400
weatherstrip $350
paint yourself $2000 up
You can see what you are up against. The car won't be worth your time and money in the end
In the OPs case I would not go with the 84. I would wait till I could get a newer model that does not need all that work. The newest C4 that your budget will allow would be my choice for you.
Paint work is super expensive as stated above. I did all my own work and still cost lots of $$$$ The newest C4s are now 22 years old. Lots of things to consider when buying a car of this age. Good luck with your purchase.
Last edited by zachaeous; Dec 16, 2018 at 01:32 AM.
And everytime I get in mine I love the car and appreciate it for what it was and is, BTW tell me which year VETTE doesn't cost a good amount of money to own????? and another BTW a 1984 is NOT very slow as you say when driving on streets and highways...
And everytime I get in mine I love the car and appreciate it for what it was and is, BTW tell me which year VETTE doesn't cost a good amount of money to own????? and another BTW a 1984 is NOT very slow as you say when driving on streets and highways...
The one single component of the 84 that was not thoroughly re-engineered from the C3 was the L83 engine. It was a carryover because of budget and time constraints. The C4 was not car of the year due to its engine, but rather in spite of it. The Crossfire was a moderately interesting and successful design when it was introduced, but this was in an era of fast advancement in engine management. The moment the L98 came out a year later, the Crossfire was rendered to the trash heap, and for good reason. The 85 was a full second faster and around 7-8mph faster in the quarter. That's not a minor incremental improvement in one year - that's a game changer in terms of power and speed. The Crossfire was slow in 1985. In 1992, when the LT1 came out, it was rendered even slower. A 90mph quarter mile trap speed is slow. There's no way around that. It's slow on the street, it's slow at a drag strip, and it's terribly slow on a road course. It's slower than the average family sedan today. It's slower than a Subaru Ascent, and way slower than Honda Odyssey minivan. It's slow. I certainly don't hate the 1984 C4, but the L83 that came in it was not "quite a piece of work at the time" - it was a parts bin carryover that the design team was forced to use for the first year, and it was slow.
ETA: If the year were 1984 right now, and the choice was to buy a C4 or spend twice as much for a 928 or many times as much for a 328, then the C4 made sense. But the OP's question was whether to buy a 1984 C4 that needs a lot of work right now, in 2018, with the intention of restoring to more-or-less stock condition (i.e. slow). Why in the world would he buy that car now, when for the same total investment he could get a cherry L98 C4 (even with a ZF6) or a very good LT1 C4? In what way is a 1984 C4 with L83 engine in stock condition intrinsically more valuable or better than a later C4 int he same condition?
Last edited by MatthewMiller; Dec 16, 2018 at 12:47 PM.
The one single component of the 84 that was not thoroughly re-engineered from the C3 was the L83 engine. It was a carryover because of budget and time constraints. The C4 was not car of the year due to its engine, but rather in spite of it. The Crossfire was a moderately interesting and successful design when it was introduced, but this was in an era of fast advancement in engine management. The moment the L98 came out a year later, the Crossfire was rendered to the trash heap, and for good reason. The 85 was a full second faster and around 7-8mph faster in the quarter. That's not a minor incremental improvement in one year - that's a game changer in terms of power and speed. The Crossfire was slow in 1985. In 1992, when the LT1 came out, it was rendered even slower. A 90mph quarter mile trap speed is slow. There's no way around that. It's slow on the street, it's slow at a drag strip, and it's terribly slow on a road course. It's slower than the average family sedan today. It's slower than a Subaru Ascent, and way slower than Honda Odyssey minivan. It's slow. I certainly don't hate the 1984 C4, but the L83 that came in it was not "quite a piece of work at the time" - it was a parts bin carryover that the design team was forced to use for the first year, and it was slow.
ETA: If the year were 1984 right now, and the choice was to buy a C4 or spend twice as much for a 928 or many times as much for a 328, then the C4 made sense. But the OP's question was whether to buy a 1984 C4 that needs a lot of work right now, in 2018, with the intention of restoring to more-or-less stock condition (i.e. slow). Why in the world would he buy that car now, when for the same total investment he could get a cherry L98 C4 (even with a ZF6) or a very good LT1 C4? In what way is a 1984 C4 with L83 engine in stock condition intrinsically more valuable or better than a later C4 int he same condition?
Last edited by MatthewMiller; Dec 16, 2018 at 03:45 PM.
These dont really share common parts with other cars other than the engine.
Price out weatherstrip for instance....or a catback. Parts prices are in sane compared to say a Camaro or Mustang
The one single component of the 84 that was not thoroughly re-engineered from the C3 was the L83 engine. It was a carryover because of budget and time constraints. The C4 was not car of the year due to its engine, but rather in spite of it. The Crossfire was a moderately interesting and successful design when it was introduced, but this was in an era of fast advancement in engine management. The moment the L98 came out a year later, the Crossfire was rendered to the trash heap, and for good reason. The 85 was a full second faster and around 7-8mph faster in the quarter. That's not a minor incremental improvement in one year - that's a game changer in terms of power and speed. The Crossfire was slow in 1985. In 1992, when the LT1 came out, it was rendered even slower. A 90mph quarter mile trap speed is slow. There's no way around that. It's slow on the street, it's slow at a drag strip, and it's terribly slow on a road course. It's slower than the average family sedan today. It's slower than a Subaru Ascent, and way slower than Honda Odyssey minivan. It's slow. I certainly don't hate the 1984 C4, but the L83 that came in it was not "quite a piece of work at the time" - it was a parts bin carryover that the design team was forced to use for the first year, and it was slow.
ETA: If the year were 1984 right now, and the choice was to buy a C4 or spend twice as much for a 928 or many times as much for a 328, then the C4 made sense. But the OP's question was whether to buy a 1984 C4 that needs a lot of work right now, in 2018, with the intention of restoring to more-or-less stock condition (i.e. slow). Why in the world would he buy that car now, when for the same total investment he could get a cherry L98 C4 (even with a ZF6) or a very good LT1 C4? In what way is a 1984 C4 with L83 engine in stock condition intrinsically more valuable or better than a later C4 int he same condition?
BTW--most cars of any type you buy will cost you money to own...



















