When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I do have to wonder what the REAL % of auto owners is, that actually go to the drags. Guesses?
Very good point. I'd be curious as well. Since the main advantage of an automatic equipped car in a drag race application is consistency, the only cars that would really benefit would be Bracket cars and Super category cars (not cars just run down the strip on test and tune or on grudge race nights).
Oh yes, my SPORTS CAR has a manual trans.
And my BRACKET RACE car has an automatic trans. (albeit manual shift).
1. Manuals calling autos 'p$%^ssies', and
2. Autos beating their collective chests about drag strip prowess.
I do have to wonder what the REAL % of auto owners is, that actually go to the drags. Guesses?
Seems like your all missing the point. John asked about the difference feel between an auto and a stick and your impressions of that difference. Somehow this turned into a whats better at the drag strip thread. Just my 2cents
No, my point was that this is a very frequently asked question/thread that always play out the same...
Sorry I confused the pressing 'issue' :rolleyes: with a side question and slightly different take. Since someone asked a question that has been asked over and over, I tried to add little variation in the answer.
The question should be: What % of drag racers use auto's?
No, my point was that although autos are good for drag racing, what % of people buy them for that and actually take them to the strip?
I figured all 5 of you would respond here, but I was just wondering about the other 5,000.
:D
Well Dumb AZZ, not all 5,000 are on the forum but I have no problem showing your LT4 what a Auto can do on the drag! Im sorry does that make me #6 Good thing this thread is not talking about stock/Mods because your ignorance is showing :conehead I have 500+ hp in my modified vette and it is a auto and by looking at your signiture your stick will only be good for a back scratcher! To ever other forum member! There will always be a faster vette Auto/Manual! It's how well you build it! If you think a manuel transmission is your only way to win a drag keep listening to tailgunner! :crazy:
It's all in what YOU prefer :cheers:
I have both a stick and an auto.
Both 1993's but they feel like 2 different cars and I love them equally just like my kids :lol:
I read quickly through all the replies to this post. I didn't notice anyone comment on the fact that the auto was a vert. and the maunal a coupe. That would account for alot of the handling difference wouldn't it? Vert. vs Coupe?
I have an 89 MT. I figure if you're going for a vette, it's gotta be stick. Of course, I immediately got rid of the shunt to 4th gear. What a pain in the butt. I love the shift through the gears, love to down shift into cornering. There is a downside... stuck in traffic in seattle or idling through a parade at 3 mph. But hey, life is good with a stick. :cheers: :steering:
I inherited my '93 auto from my mom, so I don't really complain about it, but the auto RUINS the sports car experience. For me, the worst part is having only four gears. There is no worse feeling than approaching a slow hairpin, accelerating out, and feeling the car kick down to second gear abruptly. And the thing is, second is still too high, and first is too low.
I've driven late model cars with 5spd autos, (Passat W8) and this problem was not as bad.
I with Vettes, the choice of auto or manual is actually a non choice. Vettes are specialty cars, and lots of people pick them up used. That means they often take what they can get, once they find a car with the right price, in terms of auto or manual.
I inherited my '93 auto from my mom, so I don't really complain about it, but the auto RUINS the sports car experience. For me, the worst part is having only four gears. There is no worse feeling than approaching a slow hairpin, accelerating out, and feeling the car kick down to second gear abruptly. And the thing is, second is still too high, and first is too low.
I've driven late model cars with 5spd autos, (Passat W8) and this problem was not as bad.
I with Vettes, the choice of auto or manual is actually a non choice. Vettes are specialty cars, and lots of people pick them up used. That means they often take what they can get, once they find a car with the right price, in terms of auto or manual.
Every word hits right at home :yesnod: I don't think this could be stated more clearly, and to the point for real world driving. As I mentioned in another similar post, I would NEVER EVER own a corvette unless it had a manual transmission. Drag racing aside (obviously the automatic rules here, hands down), I can't imagine life in an automatic, simply because the life would be sucked out of me :(
DarkHalo, I think the major reason for your differing impressions of those two Vettes is that you were comparing apples & oranges.
The auto vs manual was only one part of the package. Dont' foreget the difference in engines, and maybe gearing and possibly suspension & steering ratios. You realy could only make a close comparison if the cars were otherwise very close.
For example, last winter I drove my mildy modded '88 A4 to OH where my son let me drive his bone stock '99 6-speed for a short. Though my '88 would have "blown his doors off" (well, not realy that bad but a win none the less) in the 1/4 mile, that '99 "felt" quicker while rowing through the gears. Here again there was realy no comparison due to the vast differences between those two Vettes.
Of course my goal is to keep my '88 Targa with the A4 and eventually get a roadster with a stick. :yesnod:
From: SCMR Rat Pack'r Charter Member, Inland Empire Chapter
Re: Manual vs Automatic (65Z01)
DarkHalo, I think the major reason for your differing impressions of those two Vettes is that you were comparing apples & oranges.
The auto vs manual was only one part of the package. Dont' foreget the difference in engines, and maybe gearing and possibly suspension & steering ratios. You realy could only make a close comparison if the cars were otherwise very close.
For example, last winter I drove my mildy modded '88 A4 to OH where my son let me drive his bone stock '99 6-speed for a short. Though my '88 would have "blown his doors off" (well, not realy that bad but a win none the less) in the 1/4 mile, that '99 "felt" quicker while rowing through the gears. Here again there was realy no comparison due to the vast differences between those two Vettes.
Of course my goal is to keep my '88 Targa with the A4 and eventually get a roadster with a stick. :yesnod:
Ok, thats the sort of info I was looking for not some know-it-all saying "this topic has been posted before blah blah blah". Yeah, the coupe has 3.45 rear gears and the vert had 2.59 gears. I could tell it prolly had more top end than my coupe did but my coupe would slaughter it street light to street light. And they were basically both the same engine, both being L-98's. Although my coupe has aluminum heads and I believe the vert had iron heads. Like was also said I couldnt really see having a vette unless it was a stick. But thats just me. Ive only owned 2 cars in my life that were AT's. Mostly the reason I ask is Ill be getting a C5 before too long and was sorta thinking of using it as a daily driver. I have a company car now but if I use my own vehicle I get a substantial car allowance plus the added fun of driving a vette all the time. Thanks for the input.
If GM built a good stick I would prefer a stick. The stick is to much money, the clutch is very pricey as is a rebuild for the 6 speed. The C5 manual trans with an aftermarket shifter is the way to go.
The 4+3 leaves a lot to desired. The throws are a mile apart. The OD uint is a gimmick. You can buy a short throw shifter for the DN 4+3 and the OD unit should be considered an automatic trans and serviced as such. Plus, there is a proper way to engage the OD unit. Engage clutch, press OD switch The ZF is very pricey to repair. :iagree:
I prefer the auto. In other cars I prefer the stick but not in a GM.
The C-5's have the Tremec GM has finally got it right?
See my comment above.
I will never get another auto in a Vette unless it is physically necessary.
From: SCMR Rat Pack'r Charter Member, Inland Empire Chapter
Re: Manual vs Automatic (Double Aught)
The ZF is very pricey to repair. :iagree:
I prefer the auto. In other cars I prefer the stick but not in a GM.
The C-5's have the Tremec GM has finally got it right? See my comment above.
I will never get another auto in a Vette unless it is physically necessary.
I love the feel and performance of the ZF6 but you have some very valid points. I had to have the trannie replaced ($5700) right after I bought it, same for dual mass flywheel ($1200) and clutch ($300). Luckily the warranty paid for all but half of the clutch and a $100 co-pay. But the new ZF6 trannie, well, its a GM rebuilt actually, is noisy as hell. It sounds like a diesel idling when its sitting with engine running in neutral with clutch not depressed. When I get the C5 Ill prolly get a stick and just put up with the grief of it in slow freeway traffic.
I bet at least 70% of vette owners buy the tranny that they really want. Personal preference. My pref is auto. After driving thru rush hour day after day after day after day there is NOTHING more annoying than rowing thru the gears. I do go to the strip and I sure don't mind the benefit of an auto and looking at my buddy crying that he has to shift and me saying tough s*$t. Whatever the sales per year of tranny there are your number probably will be within +-5% of want people want.