When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Look in Ekler's catalog (maybe even their website) and they may mention a number. I think I read somewhere that the aluminum flywheel will boost horsepower by an extra 24 stallions. -- Eric
If I did the calculations correctly this is the benefit of the 13.5 Fidanza vs the 39lb. dual mass. I found a site that says a rule of thumb for kinetic energy reduction is 1 HP per 10 lbs of virtual weight reduction--It is a function of gear and rear axle ratio.
For the 3.45 rear gear:
Trans Gear 1 2 3 4 5 6
Virtual lbs lost 303 203 116 80 56 39
Equiv HP gain 30.3 20.3 11.6 8.0 5.6 3.9
when i bought mine from carolina clutch (13# fidanza), the sales pitch was an average 20hp gain to the wheels. this seems to echo the calculation above.
when i bought mine from carolina clutch (13# fidanza), the sales pitch was an average 20hp gain to the wheels. this seems to echo the calculation above.
It basically just frees up Hp that would be required to move the extra mass. So it is a good sales pitch and it is no BS But plain facts and physics.
The previous owner of my car put in an alum flywheel. My question is how much RW gain would one normally see on a dyno?
Has anyone ran their car on a dyno, installed the alum flywheel, and then ran again and noted the difference of RWHP?
Just curious really.
Thanks!
one of the vette magazines did this with Fidanza flywheels a couple months ago, they did two c5's and I want to say one picked up 12 and one picked up 18 - the car with the bigger gains in hp had a lot more mods to start with
I can't find the link but it's online and I know I've got the dang magazine somewhere