When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
ARP bolts are re-usuable and you shouldn't have problems. if they are stock bolts, i wouldn't re-use them. i couldn't vote because i don't know what bolts you're using this time.
If they are ARP, I'd reuse them as well. Plan on reusing mine. Now that is if we're talking about a C4 (which we're in the C4 section, we should be). If it's a C5, I know no matter what type of bolt you use, you have to replace them. They are designed to stretch and once they do, you can't reuse them.
From: Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die
St. Jude Donor '04-'05-'06-'07
I could not answer your pole because you did not have the correct answer as an option which is, follow the manufacturers recommendations. The reason for this is, that head bolts and other critical engine bolts (in some engines) these days are designed to torque past yield. That is to say that they torque past the limit at which they will return to their original length when loosened again. That means that after one use, they are junk. When I rebuilt my engine, I installed ARP head bolts. They can be reused. When I removed them some time later to install better heads, the torque had not been compromised. They were all very tight when I broke them loose. I had used their sealer-lube and torqued them to their specs. I reinstalled them with complete confidence.
head bolts and other critical engine bolts (in some engines) these days are designed to torque past yield. That is to say that they torque past the limit at which they will return to their original length when loosened again.
I don't know if this is true if the threads were torque past yield the bolt cannot hold at the specified torque any more.
From: Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die
St. Jude Donor '04-'05-'06-'07
Originally Posted by VQT88Vette
I don't know if this is true if the threads were torque past yield the bolt cannot hold at the specified torque any more.
This is how it works. They are torqued within a specified safety range beyond their elastic limit. At this point, they will hold their torque very well, which is one reason it is done. BUT if used again, they could break and at best cannot be counted on to hold their torque once they have been relieved from this designed stretch.
I just purchased the book "How to rebuild LT1/LT4 motors" here is the quote.
"Always use new cylinder head bolts for any gen 2 motor. These bolts are torque/angle tightened, and are torque-to-yield type and should not be reused."
I did not know about the newer torque to yield bolts and when I rebuilt my engine I got all the head bolts torqued on both sides except one and when I did it the darn thing broke. If there ever is a next time I will get ARP.
Older (non torque to yield) bolts "should" last for a quite few rebuilds (I have used older SBC Chevy bolts over and over with no problem).
But, I do run a standard nut onto each cleaned bolt all the way down the threads. If there is any stretch, the nut will bind. Recently, I R&R'd my 87 Vette alum. heads (for the 2nd time). Found one bolt stretched (using the above method) and it measured longer than all of the other bolts). Time for new head bolts!
If you are replacing (should if they are stock bolts) I'd go with a stud kit.
I'm thinking that for a stock or near-stock vehicle and no exotic compression ratios or power outputs (again, near stock levels) I wouldn't think that Head studs would offer much advantage over the cheaper and easier to use/remove/work on ARP head bolts. In conjunction with a felpro gasket I doubt many of us have ever had an issue that would warrant or imply the necessity for studs.
Besides, I hear they make removing the heads a total bear.
I wanted to go with studs if only for the Trickness of it, but my better sense tells me it's a waste of money, time and effort.