closed loop,open loop, question
If you think of an engine in open loop as an old school carb with a brain, you are real close.
These help to provide more $$ for the high performance of Corvette driving.
In short, God, no.
However, to a degree, yea, but the idea is still to be closest to perfect air/fuel ratio so not to waste the stuff... that's why you get a custom chip tuned to your engine.
When the engine reaches redline, and the throttle is wide open, then tables kick in again... In between, the TPS, IAT, MAP (or MAS), O2 and knock sensors keep things in check.
What I don't get is the desire to go fast and destroy our air all the same time... being fast and being emission legal are not mutually exclusive.
In short, God, no.
However, to a degree, yea, but the idea is still to be closest to perfect air/fuel ratio so not to waste the stuff... that's why you get a custom chip tuned to your engine.
When the engine reaches redline, and the throttle is wide open, then tables kick in again... In between, the TPS, IAT, MAP (or MAS), O2 and knock sensors keep things in check.
What I don't get is the desire to go fast and destroy our air all the same time... being fast and being emission legal are not mutually exclusive.
o2 sensor is not allowed to make adjustments in the mode. there is really no diffence to be in open or closed loop at this point..
the problem i ran into with my car was because of the very aggesive cam, closed loop tuning was nearly impossible.. the overlap of my cam was throwing the o2 sensor into a frenzy. throttle responce was next to zero. im a fairly knowledgable tuner and no one could get it run even decent in closed loop at lower rpms.. so what i did was disable closed loop and tune my ve tables with a wide band.. at this point my tune is at about 95% and it run good and my fuel ecomony has not suffered much at all..
my general plan was to tune it as lean as possible to run well and idle and part throttle and for max peformance at wot..
i have no desire to go fast and destoy the ozone, as bogus said..
by no means will a car running in open loop be as efficent, emmision wise, as closed but i did my best to be as close a possible.
over the winter i will be adding a fast engine management system, then problem sovled..
Actually closed loop on a stock engine should not rob power and when you go to WOT it should not be poluting, if properly tuned.
Actually we get the best of both worlds from our fuel injected and computer controlled engines. During "normal" street driving we have good power and exceptional milage from an efficient fuel burn. Yet when we call on the horses by snapping the throttle open the power is there.
I run my C4 with full emissions equipment and still have very nice power when it's called for. A well modded and setup L98 will take you into the low 12s and still be very streetble and emissions friendly (except on the Left Coast).
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
o2 sensor is not allowed to make adjustments in the mode. there is really no diffence to be in open or closed loop at this point..
the problem i ran into with my car was because of the very aggesive cam, closed loop tuning was nearly impossible.. the overlap of my cam was throwing the o2 sensor into a frenzy. throttle responce was next to zero. im a fairly knowledgable tuner and no one could get it run even decent in closed loop at lower rpms.. so what i did was disable closed loop and tune my ve tables with a wide band.. at this point my tune is at about 95% and it run good and my fuel ecomony has not suffered much at all..
my general plan was to tune it as lean as possible to run well and idle and part throttle and for max peformance at wot..
i have no desire to go fast and destoy the ozone, as bogus said..
by no means will a car running in open loop be as efficent, emmision wise, as closed but i did my best to be as close a possible.
over the winter i will be adding a fast engine management system, then problem sovled..
Your original question was if the car is running fine in both open and closed loop, then what are the advantages of running closed loop for performance.
You have to understand that you are only in open loop under certain circumstances. Usually when you first start the car, till the o2 gets hot enough, WOT, and on cold startup till the coolant temps get hot enough.
So really your only basing your "runs good" on these above situations. Most times when you start the car, there is a timer hot and cold based that expires, and you are then in closed loop. You may very well find out that your car runs horrible if you would lock the BLMs (which is an easy way to disable closed loop).
What I am trying to get at and to answer your question is there is really no reason to lock out closed loop, and if you have cats you will probably suffer in the end. If your running a HUGE cam, then yeah there are some advantages, but in the end, you should be able to work around it.
When you go WOT, the o2s are ignored so closed loop is not being employed at that time anyways to effect performance ***
I put the *** there cause there are some things happening at the moment before you go WOT that can play into things, but for all intense purposes and for sake of this discussion the 02 do not play a role.
My recommondation would be use the closed loop as it was intended. Its probably the main advantage of a FI car over carb - you can have the best of cruise type fueling and also WOT>
for most purposes closed loop is best..
for me.. it was much easier to get it to run good in open.. i may have been able to get closed loop to work for me but not successful so far.
i have a tune that will work for your car.. if you have the ability to burn your own chips and you give me all your specs, i can send it to you. it will be close to your needs..
i have a tune that will work for your car.. if you have the ability to burn your own chips and you give me all your specs, i can send it to you. it will be close to your needs..


What I don't get is the desire to go fast and destroy our air all the same time... being fast and being emission legal are not mutually exclusive.
AMEN even.
AMEN even.
Last edited by steve1ph2; Jun 10, 2005 at 04:12 AM.











