Radiator Question

Ive Got A 95 (had It For 9 Months), Runs At 196 Freeway, Air Off, 203, Air On. In Hot Weather (95-100) Runs At 225, Air On. Fans Work As Required (on At 225, Air On). No Visible Debris In Intake Or Between Condensor And Radiator. Air Dam Not Damaged. Replaced Hoses, Water Pump And Thermostat With Factory Items. No Bent Hoses Or Evidence Of Vacuum. Just Want This Thing To Run Cooler.
Dewitt Claims There Alum Radiator Has Two Cores Vs Factory Single Core, Up To 25 Degree Drop Due To Efficiency.




Contrary to everything that I've ever been taught, when my engine beginns to run hot, I turn on the AC and it stays below 210. Even in a traffic jam.
Ive Got A 95 (had It For 9 Months), Runs At 196 Freeway, Air Off, 203, Air On. In Hot Weather (95-100) Runs At 225, Air On. Fans Work As Required (on At 225, Air On). No Visible Debris In Intake Or Between Condensor And Radiator. Air Dam Not Damaged. Replaced Hoses, Water Pump And Thermostat With Factory Items. No Bent Hoses Or Evidence Of Vacuum. Just Want This Thing To Run Cooler.
Dewitt Claims There Alum Radiator Has Two Cores Vs Factory Single Core, Up To 25 Degree Drop Due To Efficiency.
RACE ON!!!
RACE ON!!!
save your money unless you see a lot of track time. your temp is optimal and is just a few degrees higher then mine at same outside temp. if you want it a few degrees cooler i would set a day aside and yank the radiator, you will be amazed at how much crud you will see between the fins, also if there are any bent fins i would straighten them.
RACE ON!!!
I agree that most people don't need the dual row radiator if everything is working right but that's a big IF. GM didn't put a single row radiator in the car because that's what it needed, they did it because of cost. If you only knew what I know about this process........
The biggest problem I see with the stock radiators is that GM designed them with absolutely zero extra. That means if you add this or add that performance item, the radiator is most likely not big enough. Or as many have said, once a few bugs and leaves get caught up in front, game over. If the radiator degrades a little with some crud, same thing. It was simply a very marginal system. I mean look at the radiators they installed in C2 and C3's, they are monsters in size compared to the late models. The second arguement for a all aluminum radiator is the common failures with the plastic tanks and gaskets. Most of these radiators never fail a "core" before the plastic tank cracks or you blow out one of the gaskets. So if a 100% tig welded radiator outlast the stock version by twice as long, then I guess it doesn't cost anything more? Pretty good spin on that one huh!


RACE ON!!!
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I agree that most people don't need the dual row radiator if everything is working right but that's a big IF. GM didn't put a single row radiator in the car because that's what it needed, they did it because of cost. If you only knew what I know about this process........
The biggest problem I see with the stock radiators is that GM designed them with absolutely zero extra. That means if you add this or add that performance item, the radiator is most likely not big enough. Or as many have said, once a few bugs and leaves get caught up in front, game over. If the radiator degrades a little with some crud, same thing. It was simply a very marginal system. I mean look at the radiators they installed in C2 and C3's, they are monsters in size compared to the late models. The second arguement for a all aluminum radiator is the common failures with the plastic tanks and gaskets. Most of these radiators never fail a "core" before the plastic tank cracks or you blow out one of the gaskets. So if a 100% tig welded radiator outlast the stock version by twice as long, then I guess it doesn't cost anything more? Pretty good spin on that one huh!

DeWitts Dual Core Rad
Edelbrock Victor Water Pump
BeCool 180 T-Stat
ALL NEW HOSES, heater, Rad, Bypass, etc.
DexCool 50/50 mix w/distilled water
NAPA Pressure Cap
Fel-Pro Intake gasket kit
BTW, the hose running from the pump to the fill tank was a no-show for my 91 L98 (supposedly discontinued). I had to get one from a local machine shop as it's got different size terminations. All other hoses were GM direct. I tried the Autozone/Advance Auto/PEP Boys route and either NO ONE had listings for some/all of the hoses OR they were (what they could get) on BACK ORDER.
Final Results: Some may say that this is not a good thing...
The car now runs (if you can believe the instrument panel using a more or less linear interpretation of "where" the needle is) at appx 145-160 on the highway w/and w/o AC on. At idle, stopped, appx the same. In traffic, w/AC on, stop and go, in near grid lock on Rte 81 in 90 degree weather in Harrisburg, Pa it sits around 180-190 MAX!
I know some may balk at the low temps as the engine really should be at 180 or more for best efficiency (so I'm told), but I'm happy w/the cooler temps and getting 19-21 driving from Scranton to Harrisburg, Pa and around the town (combined). The lower temps may also have a slight bit of help from my Stainless LT headers that were JetHot coated. Either way, that's my experience. I wouldn't suggest that anyone replace the rad w/o doing a comprehensive parts replacement like I did. Just like when choosing cam/heads/intake... it's always best to "component-match" for a more effiecient system, regardless of what that system is.
One more thing, as the posts above suggested, when I pulled off my upper rad shroud, appx 1/3 of the rad was "clogged" with what looked like dust/grass clippings/etc. I also had a (slight) gathering of "stuff" at the bottom between the rad and the condenser. I'm certain that if I had just cleaned the rad that it would have helped somewhat. It was simply my choice to go the way I did... costly too... appx $900-$1000 altogether.
Hope this helps.
JM
be aware that although TheGuardian has switched from
glycol to DexCool, he did it as part of a complete system
change.
There have been several sad tales here and elsewhere
about the consequences of mixing these two coolants,
even by those who attempted to flush the glycol before
refilling with Dex. Some have speculated that even
leftover coolant residue that has permeated the gaskets
& hoses can initiate troubles due to incompatibility.
The wise route is to refill with a fresh charge of the OEM
A/F for your year C4. Mix this 50:50 with distilled water
and if you use glycol, replace it on a two-year cycle to keep
ahead of the corrosion when the additive package can no
longer protect from the electrolytic reaction that occurs
between dissimilar metals (alum & iron).
Last edited by Slalom4me; Jul 21, 2005 at 09:12 AM.
The results of mixing the two are VERY BAD! Usual results are clogged cooling systems. If "mostly" cleaned/flushed, the worst you might see is a film that looks a little like baked-on Gulden's Hot Mustard (I've seen that w/several of my friend's cars). I have been running Dex for about 6 years now. When I originally did this, I spent a few hours completely and meticulously draining/flushing the cooling system.
So, unless you have the time, use whatever you have been using. But if you're ready for a change, just remember to do a complete flush job!
Sorry if that point was somewhat ambiguous.
JM
I know some may balk at the low temps as the engine really should be at 180 or more for best efficiency (so I'm told), but I'm happy w/the cooler temps and getting 19-21 driving from Scranton to Harrisburg, Pa and around the town (combined).
RACE ON!!!

Thanks All For The Great Experiences And Info.
One More Question: Anyone Know Of A Rad Shop In North Sandiego Area That Has Experiece With C4 Systems And Hopefully The Dewitt Radiator?
RACE ON!!!
RACE ON!!!
As to the temps, I like them just where they are. The engine compartment is plenty hot and I don't anticipate any premature wear. As I said earlier... if you can believe the interpretation of "where" the needle is... I don't have specs on the linearity properties of the temp sending unit/guage... so I am only speculating...
Lastly, I never said that I was shooting for good gas mileage. In order to do that, I'd have to stay off the go pedal??? If I was concerned about gas mileage, I'd get a YUGO... :-}
JM
Anyway, you have a potent cooling system, but you do want to shoot for 180* coolant temps for max efficiency in all areas. In your case you have a supurb cooling system, you would just want to verify actual operating temps and if they remain too low as you state, change the T-stat to a 180* and reprogram the fans to come on around 190* or so. That would be ideal. But it's your car so all we can do is give free advice.
JM
RACE ON!!!
Personally I'd prefer 180 all the time.
BTW What does your oil temp run at?
Another point... the engine DOES COME UP TO TEMP! It simply runs a bit cooler on the highway WHERE I SELDOM DRIVE IT!
AS to WHY I upgraded, all of the upgrades I have done, ie: SuperRam Intake, headers, Random Tech Cat, B7B Cat Back, a purpose built trans w/B&M Converter w/billet flex plate and (YES) the cooling system (D44 is next) I have done so in anticipation of an engine build that certainly WILL run alot warmer when I drop in a 400+ ci SBC. I'm simply wringing out ALL of the supporting subsystems prior to upgrading the heart of the machine. The last thing I want is a list of unknowns when I drop in the engine, like some of the horror stories I've read on this site like the LT1 rebuild that can't start his engine (has spark, fuel, etc) or the others who've put together their SuperRam only to have coolant in their cylinders... and on and on and on...........
The reason for the lower temps on the highway... as I've stated where I seldom spend my time... are most likely due to the coolant bypass keeping enough of the coolant flowing (along w/the T-Stat partially opening) as well as the increased cooling capabilities of new DeWitts radiator.
Given the choice between running hot or running cool, I'll take cool. When did you last see someone blow a rad/heater hose, head gasket, tranny or any other of an assorted list of hardware running a cooler than what's considered normal engine. I can tell you that I've passed enough people on PA Rte's 81, 84, 80, 380, turnpike etc in my daily driver that had boiled over or blown a hose or two due to OVERtemp in stop/go gridlocked (construction, accidents,etc) traffic.
Just like in politics or better yet religion, YOU go your way and I'LL go YAHWEH.
JM
If course you wouldn't "anticipate any premature wear". If you did, wouldn't have modified your cooling system as you have. Not anticipating because of not knowing doesn't make the problems nonexistent. I think if I wasted "appx $900-$1000 altogether", I would feel compelled to say, "As to the temps, I like them just where they are.", too.
You said that your car runs "at appx 145-160 on the highway w/and w/o AC on.". Despite the possibility of a mis-"interpretation of "where" the needle is", I would expect you would want to hook up a known good gauge for verification purposes. Those highway temps on which you are "only speculating", indicates that your thermostat isn't opening. Whether you agree with conventional wisdom or not, I would think you would want to satisfy yourself that everything is operating as you believe it should.
I never said that you said that you said you were "shooting for good gas mileage.", but it was YOU that brought up the subject. I only commented on the point you raised.
RACE ON!!!









