180* vs 160* Hypertech T-stat??
The running temp is controlled by the airflow through the core.
If you want to lower operating temp then you need to change when the fan(s) cut in and out.
Someone give me the final word!!!What should I use???????????????
Thanks,
Audible

rodj,
Good job. You beat me to it in THIS thread.
RACE ON!!!
The running temp is controlled by the airflow through the core.
If you want to lower operating temp then you need to change when the fan(s) cut in and out.
I'm running a 160 T-Stat with fans on at 195*. In cool weather my engine will run form 165 to 175 degrees, which I find is just on the edge of warm enough for closed loop and correct tune. In hot weather of the summer my engine will run 180 degrees on the highway, and 195 degrees in stop and go traffic. With the A/C on it still doesn't run above 195 unless I get stuck in a traffic jam on a really hot day.
So, except in really hot weather conditions the car will run cooler, maybe too cool for proper tune.
I think I need to change to a 180 T-stat, but I'm waiting until cooler weather to do it.
I'm running a 160 T-Stat with fans on at 195*. In cool weather my engine will run form 165 to 175 degrees, which I find is just on the edge of warm enough for closed loop and correct tune. In hot weather of the summer my engine will run 180 degrees on the highway, and 195 degrees in stop and go traffic. With the A/C on it still doesn't run above 195 unless I get stuck in a traffic jam on a really hot day.
So, except in really hot weather conditions the car will run cooler, maybe too cool for proper tune.
I think I need to change to a 180 T-stat, but I'm waiting until cooler weather to do it.
165* engine operation temps are just entirely too low. You may be reaching closed loop, but the oil can't reach temperature.
All I can suggest is replace the 160* stat with 180* and the engine will love you for it.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I've run the stock 195* t-stat, and recently changed to a 180* piece. I noticed no change in temps at all. Maybe a couple degrees on the highway, but nothing worth writing home about.
With that said, I also went with a 185 fan switch, and both fans operate from it.
My temp never gets to 190, regardless of the driving situation.
I did a complete flush after pulling the rad for a clean up and fin straightening.
And I am running about a 40/60 mix of collant and I added a bottle of water wetter.
C4 radiators are sized to maintain 180-195 F over 35 mph, so a 160 stat is a waste of money and installation effort. For the life of me I cannot understand why anyone who understands how auto cooling systems work would want to install a 160 F thermostat.
You'll just have to read through the opinions and experience and make up your own mind.
But if you change the T-stat temp you also need to change the fan on/off control to match.
Hey, try it and see if you like it; if not, change it back.
C4 radiators are sized to maintain 180-195 F over 35 mph, so a 160 stat is a waste of money and installation effort. For the life of me I cannot understand why anyone who understands how auto cooling systems work would want to install a 160 F thermostat.
Time to enjoy the car. Plenty of time to work on it this fall.
C4 radiators are sized to maintain 180-195 F over 35 mph, so a 160 stat is a waste of money and installation effort. For the life of me I cannot understand why anyone who understands how auto cooling systems work would want to install a 160 F thermostat.
Turns out I'm doing more cruising than racing so my needs have changed.





Turns out I'm doing more cruising than racing so my needs have changed.
If I was racing, and almost exclusively so, yes, a 160 stat would be used to keep heat soak down and keep things cooler.
However, if I was doing a mix, or more street with occasional racing, I would get a 180 stat, with a manual fan switch.
The logic is simple, with the 180 stat, the oil gets upto op temp and allows all metals to expand correctly.
With the manual fan, the fans can be cranked up and the coolant temps lowered to regain control of the heat soak issue.
L98s need the same temp settings as an LT1... There is a basic reason for this - they are so much alike, it ain't even funny! Since the aluminum heads arrived in 1986, the L98 has the same basic properties as an LT1 - iron block, aluiminum heads, aluminum pistons.
As such, the divergent metals need the same treatment. If your engine had iron heads, then I would consider - hell, recommend - a 160 stat... the heat loss just isn't there with all that iron. Aluminum cools SO much faster.
Which leads me to the LT5... I would be VERY cautious about putting a 170 stat on one of those motors... It just sounds to me to be a recipe for disaster.












