When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
What is your deck height? The .010, is this off the heads? If so, that doesn't have anything to do with your quench. Quench is basically how far the piston is down in the bore and what thickness your head gasket will be.
Don't rely on math figures, check all 8 with a dial indicator when you have the shortblock together. Professional engine builders like to use a simple bridge with two 0-1" travel dial indicators for fast accurate checking. Technically speaking you should be OK with a zero deck (and the engine will run its best at zero, piston exactly at deck height at TDC, square in the bore) and a compressed gasket thickness of .040 but that would also depend on how much the piston rocks in the bore (side to side) due to skirt design. You should be OK if it does not rock out more than .015 over the deck. You will have your most efficient combustion chamber when you limit crevice volumes and end gases which is what excess minus deck height would translate into. This would be more of a consideration for an all-out engine and not so important for the street but your target compression ratio should be derived from the combustion chamber volume rather than adjusting piston deck height.
thank you for your replys, and Nathan, your spreadsheet is very helpful!
here is my combo
396 with eagle forged stroker kit, SRP Flattop Pistons with 7cc Valve Pockets, AFR heads with 66cc Chambers
anyways, im ending up with 10.9 to 1 with 0 deck height and 0.040 gasket
the cam i use is a 224/230 .605 .622 113LSA 110ICL
this ends to a Dynamic C/R of 8.57 to 1
a forum member runs his 396 with the very same cam on 93 octane gas...
here in Austria, 98 and 100 octane gas is available, which should be 95 to 96 in your (american) numbers..
i´m open for any Inputs!!!
Last edited by corvette90; Sep 20, 2005 at 02:03 PM.
First, I see nothing wrong with that parts combination. But your dynamic compression ratio is too high for the engine to live. Also, intuitively, it just looks too high for the rest of your combination. Something is wrong, here. Did you use the .050" lift duration (224°) when you figured the dynamic CR? Compression can't start to build in the cylinder until the intake valve is on it's seat.
First, I see nothing wrong with that parts combination. But your dynamic compression ratio is too high for the engine to live. Also, intuitively, it just looks too high for the rest of your combination. Something is wrong, here. Did you use the .050" lift duration (224°) when you figured the dynamic CR? Compression can't start to build in the cylinder until the intake valve is on it's seat.
And you used the advertised duration intake valve closing point in the calculation? Your dynamic CR is higher than in the 11.5:1 static CR engine I'm building. I really think there is something wrong with those numbers.