C4 OBD 1 or 2?
http://www.vetronix.com/diagnostics/...icle_list.html
This data is stored in the airbag control module. A good FAQ list is available on Vetronix's site:
http://www.vetronix.com/diagnostics/cdr/faqs.html
Be well,
SJW
As a side note, bi-directional OBDII scanners are more expensive. That said, used Snap On MT2500 scanners can be had for under $700 with a descent cartridge. Mine has paid for itself since I have GM, Ford, and MOPAR products, all covered with one cartridge.
I wouldn't select a car solely based on OBDII compliance, but if two cars were really close, I'd take the OBDII car.
dlmeyers 90 coupe (my only OBD 1 vehicle) zf6 3speed shocks
As a side note, bi-directional OBDII scanners are more expensive. That said, used Snap On MT2500 scanners can be had for under $700 with a descent cartridge. Mine has paid for itself since I have GM, Ford, and MOPAR products, all covered with one cartridge.
I wouldn't select a car solely based on OBDII compliance, but if two cars were really close, I'd take the OBDII car.
dlmeyers 90 coupe (my only OBD 1 vehicle) zf6 3speed shocks
Either way I guess. I'm sure OBD II has some downsides. I'll probably concentrate on 96 vettes, and keep an eye out on 95's.
thanks
Be well,
SJW


As rodj mentioned, you can buy scan tools that work with both protocols automatically and use the OBD2 cable/connector or OBD1 cable/connector interchangeably, but the internal software used for the scan is different. Depending on the scan tool used you may not notice the difference, but if you were to buy an OBD2 scan tool without built-in OBD1 support, solely because of the OBD2 connector, expecting it to work on an OBD1 vehicle, you will be severely disappointed.
As Red Dwarf, FD2BLK, RAGOVET, and some others have stated, it is not a simple case of all 95 and earlier vehicles being OBD1. Federal law required that ALL 96 model year vehicles sold in the US be OBD2 compliant. There was no law stopping the car manufacturers from implementing OBD2 sooner than the 96 model year. So, starting at some point in the 94/95 production runs, GM began using OBD2 connectors in some car lines. There is no verifyable number of units that shipped this way that I know of. It wasn't required by law to use OBD2 connectors for the 94/95s, so it did not need not be recorded or reported. So, most all 95 Vettes have OBD2 connectors and OBD1 protocol systems.
GM was legally able to implement the OBD2 protocol at any time prior to the 96 model year and it is my understanding that in some 95's it did implement partial "OBD2 capability" using the OBD1 protocol, as well as some production of 95s with full OBD2. All 94s used OBD1, even though they had the OBD2 connectors and additional O2 sensors.
As has already been mentioned, the ONLY sure way to know if your 95 Vette is using the OBD1 or OBD2 protocol is to look at the Vehicle Emmisions Sticker on your car.













