When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As my factory brake lines are dry and cracked, I am about to order Stainless lines from Summit. They offer Earl's and Russell. Prices are close. I will ask the forum, is either set better (I know, subjective) than the other? Which do you prefer/why? This is an 88 vert, stock brakes. Just used for street driving.
Thanks for your input.
In addition to Russell and Earl's, also consider Goodridge. They all
purport to meet D.O.T. MVSS106. Goodridge states their's are D.O.T.
certified / T.U.V. approved. Earl's says D.O.T. does not 'approve', they
just set out the specs and it is up to mfrs to self-certify for
compliance.
Earl's have Teflon inner hose, Goodridge is PTFE, I haven't found out
what Russell uses. Now "Teflon®" is the registered trademark of the
DuPont Company for its fluorocarbon resins. DuPont pioneered the use
of Teflon® PTFE and FEP resins. I don't know, but perhaps Earl's
uses Teflon® PTFE from DuPont and Goodridge uses PTFE from another
source??
AFAIK - the inner hoses are essentially the same stuff.
I and a fellow traveller have the Earl's 'Hyperfirm' lines on '89 cars here.
I bought Earl's because they are D.O.T., they have a respected name,
they were available locally for a good price. Otherwise, I would have
sought out Goodridge from a mail order outfit.
I have nothing against Russell.
.
Last edited by Slalom4me; Oct 7, 2005 at 08:39 PM.
SS lines will wear out over time; it's just harder to see
because of the SS braid.
Originally Posted by the blur
Unless you're racing, stick with the OEM rubber lines.
I am guessing that "the blur's" comment is related to the issue
mentioned by "tkrussell".
I've read anecdotal accounts of SS lines failing with age. I haven't
come across any recommendations about a replacement schedule
and mine are too new for the matter to be forefront in my mind.
SS lines give enough of an improvement in pedal feel that I'd
amend "the blur's" advice to say use them, but only if you are
prepared to replace them on a regular schedule. In my case, I'll
be watching for developments and in the absence of hard info, I'll
probably change mine after 5 yrs.
From: San Diego , CA Double Yellow DirtBags 1985..Z51..6-speed
SS lines are way overhyped.
I shrunkwrapped mine to preventt dirt from getting in the braids and damaging the brittle teflon. I couldn't use rubber though, since mine are custom, but I woulda if I coulda.
I have Earl's on my 90. I only went with them because the price was comparable to the OE rubber. I got a good deal from a forum member so I went for it. Fit is nice with no issues. I did not really notice any difference after the install.
some where on the www is a great article on why NOT to use SS brake hoses. you must inspect them frequently.
and I would really like to know if anybody can really feel the difference in the pedal. What 99% of people are feeling is the result of FRESH brake fluid, not the teflon hoses.
I replaced my hoses with NEW GM hoses. works for me.
I've seen teflon hoses KINK when the caliper hangs off for a brake job. Can't say I ever saw a rubber hose kink.
I am guessing that "the blur's" comment is related to the issue
mentioned by "tkrussell".
I've read anecdotal accounts of SS lines failing with age. I haven't
come across any recommendations about a replacement schedule
and mine are too new for the matter to be forefront in my mind.
SS lines give enough of an improvement in pedal feel that I'd
amend "the blur's" advice to say use them, but only if you are
prepared to replace them on a regular schedule. In my case, I'll
be watching for developments and in the absence of hard info, I'll
probably change mine after 5 yrs.
.
Five years? Is that a sched that you'd recommend for all brake hoses, rubber, tef or ss? A bit of an explanation would be appreciated. Thx.
and I would really like to know if anybody can really feel the difference in the pedal. What 99% of people are feeling is the result of FRESH brake fluid, not the teflon hoses.
I replaced my hoses with Earls AFTER rebuilding the calipers and flushing the system. There was a definate increase in pedal firmness
I replaced my hoses with NEW GM hoses. works for me.
And they cost the same, if not more, than Earl's SS hoses
I've seen teflon hoses KINK when the caliper hangs off for a brake job. Can't say I ever saw a rubber hose kink.
Read your repair manual... You aren't supposed to let the caliper hang from the hose no matter what kind of hose you use. Use a piece of coat hangar with a hook bent in both ends to hang it from the springs or whatever else is handy and within reach of the caliper hose.
Much good info here. I guess as far as SS braided lines go, as long as it is a name brand, it will all be the same. Frequent inspection and routine replacement seems to be the key. As the price is not exhorbitant, and the job is not hard, replacement after a few years would seem to be a good answer. I did find a piece on an NSX page that gives some good info, as well. http://www.nsxprime.com/FAQ/Performance/brakelines.htm
Thanks to all for your input. As usual, the forum members' knowledge and experience comes through. This is a great group. I am very proud to be a member, albeit a junior and less experienced one, of this forum.
You all have a great weekend.
FWIW, I've got Goodridge (bought from VB&P) on mine. When I originally installed them, I had just flushed the brake lines so the fluid was new (hadn't been intending to get the lines then, but opportunity presented itself). There was a noticeable increase in pedal firmness. HOWEVER - it almost felt like the car took longer to stop afterwards. I don't think it really did, but it just felt that way.
Now I've got front C5 calipers and the pedal is like a rock using Valvoline synthetic brake fluid.