Delteq and ASR/ABS problems
I get the following codes:
CCM H41 - ECM Data Communications Lost
EBCM H62 - Tachometer Data Error
EBCM H71 - EBCM Internal Error
I wonder if the internal tach filter in Delteq module is causing the problems. Has anyone else had these codes and been able to find the problem? I've checked the connectes and didn't find anything loose.
Thanks,
Dave
In fact, you want the tach output of the Delteq to NOT go through your stock tach filter.
You have to eliminate/bypass your original tach filter for the ABS, ASR, and tach to work properly.
Tom Piper
I got my service manual last night finally and went through the ASR/ABS section. It says that since the H71 code is being set each time teh ASR/ABS goes out that the EBCM needs to be replaced.
Has anyone replaced their EBCM before? Does anyone know a good place to buy one?
Dave
http://www.delteq.com/Manual_r3.pdf


The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
The tach does work correctly. I've never seen it bounce or act odd. I'll check the TPS tonight. I haven't read that section of the service manual yet but I'm sure there is a way to verify the TPS is good or bad.
I did see last night that there is a ground for the TPS by the TB and I'll check it too. It has oil on it because my intake manifold is leaking....that's another project though.
If there's an easy way to check the TPS that's not in the service manual I would love to hear about it.
Dave
For TPS problems associated with ABS/ASR, keep in mind, the throttle position sensor feeds the "TPS buffer" (square looking device located beside the windshield washer bottle), and the output of the TPS buffer feeds the ABS/ASR. So, if the TPS buffer is defective, the ABS/ASR computer would not get throttle position information but the ECM would.
CCM H41 - ECM Data Communications Lost
EBCM H62 - Tachometer Data Error
EBCM H71 - EBCM Internal Error
Do you get any CCM error codes?
And, finally, keep in mind, it isn't unusual to have the ECM go bad on vehicles up to and including the '93 model -- the '94 and up ECMs seem to be more immune to problems.
Tom Piper
Now I have to figure out of the TPS is bad, the TPS Buffer is bad, or the ECM is bad.
I saw in another post that the TPS should be around .54 volts. Is there a way to check the TPS Buffer? I didn't get a chance to verify the TPS is good last night.
Dave
The CCM is the master computer and the remaining computers (ECM, ASR/ABS computer, C68 climate control) are slaves.
You are getting a CCM trouble-code telling you the data on the serial-link is down.
You are getting a trouble-code telling you the tachometer information isn't getting to the ASR/ABS computer -- you already know the tach information is getting to the tach, so the Delteq is OK. This probably means the tach information is getting to the ECM.
So, the tach information is getting to the ECM, but the CCM can't get that information from the ECM to pass on to the ASR/ABS computer.
If I am correct, the TPS signal that goes to the TPS buffer and then to the ASR/ABS computer bypasses the CCM and goes directly to the ASR/ABS computer -- so, this eliminates the communications link for it.
From my experience, the pre-'94 ECM is a trouble spot.
So, I think your ECM isn't sending the information to the CCM to pass on to the ASR/ABS.
A decent way to prove this is to disconnect the ABS/ASR and C68 climate control computers.
Doing this, you know you are going to get ABS/ASR errors and C68 errors -- ignore them.
The vehicle will still run without these.
The important thing to look for is the CCM error to see if it is still there.
If it is, there is definitely a communications link problem between the ECM and CCM -- the ABS/ASR and C68 climate control are out of the picture.
If the communications is not there then, you have one of three problems:
1) The serial-link is shorted to ground -- unlikely
2) The CCM is defective -- the CCM hardly ever goes bad
3) The ECM is defective -- the pre-94 ECM is known to go bad frequently.
It's your choice.
Tom Piper
When the car was cold and had sat for 2 days I pulled the codes. The only thing present was ERR on the 9.1 EBCS menu. I drove the car today after resetting the 9.1 module and it gave me the 2 codes:
CCM H41 - ECM Data Communications Lost
EBCM H71 - EBCM Internal Error
I reset the codes this morning and then went for another drive. All ABS/ASR lights lit up a couple of times but no codes were ever set.
Tom,
Does that give you the impression that the ECM is dying?
Thanks for the help,
Dave
"CCM H41 - ECM Data Communications Lost"
means the CCM has requested data at least three times and never got it from the ECM.
There is a possibility of four computers on the serial-link that the ECM and CCM communicate on:
1) CCM -- the master computer
2) ECM -- the computer that runs the engine
3) ABS/ASR computer
4) C68 climate control
Any of these computers could become defective and short that serial-link to ground and cause a communications failure between the CCM and ECM.
The good thing is the vehicle will still run without the ABS/ASR computer and the C68 climate control computer.
So, to narrow the problem down as much as possible here are my suggestions.
1) Disconnect the battery and disconnect all of four of the computers from the serial-link and measure the serial-link to ground with an accurate ohmmeter. If it is grounded, you've found your problem.
2) Connect only the ECM and CCM to the serial-link and then connect the battery, clear the codes, and see if the same communications trouble-code sets. Make sure you run the vehicle long enough to set the code -- at least to the engine is completely warmed up. If it doesn't, the problem is probably in the ASR/ABS computer or the C68 climate control. If it does set, then either the CCM or the ECM is the problem. Both are needed for the security handshake to start the engine, so you can't narrow it down any further.
Since the ECM is under the hood with the all that heat, if the problem only happens after the engine is warmed up, I would highly suspect the ECM.
The ECM in pre-'94 vehicles is known to be a frequent source of trouble, so between the ECM and CCM, I would think it was the ECM.
But, I can't tell you that for sure.
I don't know any way to narrow the problem down any further without the test fixtures to test them individually like Delco would have done.
Tom Piper











