When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I was always under the impression that the axel ratio on my 87 auto was 3.07 but I received the window sticker and build sheet from the Corvette Museum yesterday and it has my axle ration at 2.59
You have the standard. The option was the performance axle ratio, 3.07.
That's interesting because also checked is:
Z52 Sport Handling Package (Incls B4P FG3 KC4 and V01 options)...you would have thought that one of those numbers would be the performance axle ratio to go along with the Z52 package.
OK..maybe I'm reading the build sheet wrong. It has a whole list of options on the bottom of the build sheet with some having astricts (*) and just saw that the * means "standard" so with my Z52 Sport Handling package, I probably do have the 3.07 performance axle ratio and not the "standard 2.59.
At least for the 1984, the Z51 handling package ALLOWED you to order the performance ratio. The performance ratio wasn't part of the handling package, but you couldn't even ORDER the performance ratio if you didn't first spec the handling package.
RACE ON!!!
PS.
Originally Posted by CREWZIN
Great, so if I need the G92, and I don't, I'm back to having the 2.59 ratio.
Standard or optional, the gear ratio should be indicated on the build sheet.
G44 = 3.07:1
GM1 = 2.59:1
Last edited by CFI-EFI; Jan 12, 2006 at 11:28 AM.
Reason: PS.
Great, so if I need the G92, and I don't, I'm back to having the 2.59 ratio.
Assuming you don't drag race, I'll bet you could find a D36 with 3.07 gears pretty cheaply to swap in. A lot of guys are upgrading to the D44 and just want to get rid of their D36 for something.
Assuming you don't drag race, I'll bet you could find a D36 with 3.07 gears pretty cheaply to swap in. A lot of guys are upgrading to the D44 and just want to get rid of their D36 for something.
Hmmmm. So, why don't I go directly for the D44? Not really worried about gas mileage, and don't really condsider myself a "drag racer" but have visited the track a couple times. But if the D44 would give me better low end "get-up-and -go" qualities, it might be worth a look at.
Hmmmm. So, why don't I go directly for the D44? Not really worried about gas mileage, and don't really condsider myself a "drag racer" but have visited the track a couple times. But if the D44 would give me better low end "get-up-and -go" qualities, it might be worth a look at.
Just from reading numerous prior threads, I think the D44 starts to make sense when your engine is producing, say, 450 HP at the flywheel or you have a stick shift and shock the rear at the instant of launch with drag radials.
I am installing about a 450 hp engine in about 10 days. I am going to try to "cheap out" by installing the rear end cover with bearing supports in my D36. I have an automatic. Will let Ya'll know if I am smart or a dummy. :o My thinking is, much rear end breakage results from the unsupported rear bearings distorting under high stress. I'll keep CF posted as my project unfolds.
D44 isnt going to improve any feel or times, its merely an upgrade in durability over the original D36.
A rear axle has no definite engine-torque limit (hp breaks nothing, only torque does) which you can read about on my website. It will blow when it pleases, but the D44 will take the drag strip abuse for a very long time and you can use drag slicks, which you cant for the D36.
Hmmmm. So, why don't I go directly for the D44? Not really worried about gas mileage, and don't really condsider myself a "drag racer" but have visited the track a couple times. But if the D44 would give me better low end "get-up-and -go" qualities, it might be worth a look at.
Although I haven't done it myself, I've seen here that there is some fabrication work involved, although it seems minor. Additionally, finding the D44 will not be cheap.
At least for the 1984, the Z51 handling package ALLOWED you to order the performance ratio. The performance ratio wasn't part of the handling package, but you couldn't even ORDER (crap) the performance ratio if you didn't first spec the handling package.
RACE ON!!!
PS.Standard or optional, the gear ratio should be indicated on the build sheet.
G44 = 3.07:1
GM1 = 2.59:1
So why does a mate of mine with an 84 have a 3.31 factory fitted and no Z51? And has G92 on his build sticker (1 of 410 ordered). Has no FG3 either (Bilstein shocks). The 87 i had was a 3.07 G92, and had every option bar B2K, AQ9, AC1, D84, MM4, UL5(had BOSE), and no Z51 or Z52. 2.59 was not available in 84 as far as i know, it was either 2.73 or 3.31 for autos or so im led to believe. CREWZIN, what RPM do you sit on at 60 mph? 1,550-1,600 is 2.59, and 1,700-1,800 is 3.07.
Although I haven't done it myself, I've seen here that there is some fabrication work involved, although it seems minor. Additionally, finding the D44 will not be cheap.
D36 to D44 is a straight bolt in. You need D44/with batwing, D44 driveshaft, and the D44 C-Beam.
It's an easy day.
So why does a mate of mine with an 84 have a 3.31 factory fitted and no Z51? And has G92 on his build sticker (1 of 410 ordered).
Interesting! I cannot remember where I THINK I learned that tidbit of information. Is it possible I am wrong? It would appear that way. Stranger things have happened. You are correct on the quantity, of 210, of the 3.31:1 (RPO GW4) cars built. Only the 210, out of the 51,547 cars produced in 1984 got the 3.31 ratio because it was a 1984 offering, only. The standard, and the only other 1984 ratio, installed in the other 51,337 cars with the Dana 36's (both manual and automatic cars) was the RPO# HE3, 3.07:1 gear ratio.
I'm wrong plenty. And I'm not shy about owning up to my mistakes. I believe Casethecorvetteman, and that is why I said, "Is it possible I am wrong? It would appear that way. Stranger things have happened.". It doesn't look so bad if you quote the whole thought. I wish I could remember where I read, what I thought I read. It is possible it referred to a different item, other than the gear ratio, and I just screwed it up. In any case with no defense for my statement, I acknowledge and admit I'm wrong. Sorry people and thanks for correcting and enlightening me, Casethecorvetteman.
I'm wrong plenty. And I'm not shy about owning up to my mistakes. I believe Casethecorvetteman, and that is why I said, "Is it possible I am wrong? It would appear that way. Stranger things have happened.". It doesn't look so bad if you quote the whole thought. I wish I could remember where I read, what I thought I read. It is possible it referred to a different item, other than the gear ratio, and I just screwed it up. In any case with no defense for my statement, I acknowledge and admit I'm wrong. Sorry people and thanks for correcting and enlightening me, Casethecorvetteman.
RACE ON!!!
No worries at all mate (Sometimes we read some funny things like this and get them confused, ive done that here before!!) Now, if you have any idea of how we can talk this bloke into swaping me the 3.31:1 from his 84 into my auto 94 with 2.59:1, please pass on your thoughts!! I reckon that ratio would be the perfect balance for me since i drive the car everyday, maybe 3.54 would go better since i have a few valve train and head/intake mods, but im not all too sure on the best option, id like to go up to DANA44 and get either 3.33 or 3.45 and just know the diff has a better chance of surviving the everyday abuse (which probably would never break a DANA36) it sees at times. I like to be certain i have enough strength!! (which is why i spent $3,800 Australian on my auto transmission, with $1,209 covered by warranty company.... the guy that built it for me was so confident it will never break he gave me a 2 year/unlimited mile warranty for free and included free towing if it does, his rebuilds normally come with 12 month/25,000klm warranty)