Another "shock" question
I have a 1990 with the the standard non adjustible suspension.
At 54K miles the cars rides terrible and as far as I can see it has the original Bilstein/Delco set of shocks.
I don't race the car and don't get a lot of opportunities to push it hard in the corners or wind it up as I live in suburban area. Therefore, as a driver (the car) I'm looking to soften the ride up. Edelbrocks have been mentioned but are pricey. Mid America sells "posi control shocks" which are just overpriced Gabriels
Any recommendations other than those mentioned above?
Flatbush 862
I have a 1990 with the the standard non adjustible suspension.
At 54K miles the cars rides terrible and as far as I can see it has the original Bilstein/Delco set of shocks.
I don't race the car and don't get a lot of opportunities to push it hard in the corners or wind it up as I live in suburban area. Therefore, as a driver (the car) I'm looking to soften the ride up. Edelbrocks have been mentioned but are pricey. Mid America sells "posi control shocks" which are just overpriced Gabriels
Any recommendations other than those mentioned above?
Flatbush 862
Richard
I guess when it comes time I'll put the names in a hat and pick one
I think they are the originals I have only owned the Car for 10 years now, and 5th owner.But the Bilsteins have lasted this long that I don't mind paying for a new set. In the long run I believe the Bilsteins are a better deal. The Car came with them and have lasted this long, they must work. I noticed last season the ride was getting harsh, so it's time for shocks. I figure with the "cheaper" shocks you may end up replacing them more often..I don't know. I just want to do it once and forget about it.





Many C4'ers say they enjoy driving their car even more than newer vettes because if "feels" more like a sports car. To me, that is determined by spring rates/travel.
You may not be able to get the "soft ride" you're looking for from a vette. That's not really what they're designed for.... I forgot to look at your model year before typing this response, but I do know they changed the spring rate after the first year/two (on C4s) to help with the harshness.
Raising any car (giving is MORE suspension travel) or slowing the spring rate gives any car a softer ride. However, it pitches and rolls more easily. "Softer" shocks slow the bouncing wheels down less -- which really is what a worn-out shock does! To some, this may feel like a softer ride. To others, this might feel like excess hop and a worn suspension. So definition is the real issue....
One easy way to get a softer ride is lowering your tire pressure -- though you'll wear your tires on the outside somewhat faster. You may lose a tiny bit of mileage too. I wouldn't go much lower than 28 PSI -- if you want to try it.
I think it's hard to beat Bilsteins because they dampen springs like they are supposed to. It's part of the specific design. I think the reason opinions are so varied is that expectations/definitions are so varied. To me, looking for a soft-riding car means looking for a Buick!
for the cost versus others I'll try them out-if I'm not satisfyed I'll go another route-
as for other shocks-I don't know-but many a forum member have been very satisfyed with the KYBs-like you I don't go to the strip anymore and don't cross country-but I do try to watch my $$$$ and want a softer ride.
Get the factory bilsteins, they are by far the best riding shock. If you have an existing set of bilsteins, get them revalved by bilstein to any spec you desire. Bilsteins compression and rebound match your spring rate best, for the better overall ride.
Stay away from the edelbrock IAS, I have them on my car and they suck, very rough. In addition, they have one inch less shock travel because of that IAS valve which make the shock bottom out sooner when you hit some rough road.











