Shortys vs. Longtubes
My car- 96 LT4


Now the hp gains from shorties to longtube on these cars are significant. I 'm not sure if there is any gain at all with shorties (yes, I've had some on my car) but I can gaurentee longtubes are a definite 15rwhp due to my experience and the dyno results here.
Shorties are much prettier than the stock manifold tho.
Oh and are Pace Setters any good?
Docspeed our CF member lives in commerce GA and he has the shorty's i like revving his car its a quick response, than my long tubes in my car, he infact has Hotcam/ported heads/gears....
But i love the exhaust note from long tube motors though.
Oh and are Pace Setters any good?
Docspeed our CF member lives in commerce GA and he has the shorty's i like revving his car its a quick response, than my long tubes in my car, he infact has Hotcam/ported heads/gears....
But i love the exhaust note from long tube motors though.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts




Docspeed our CF member lives in commerce GA and he has the shorty's i like revving his car its a quick response, than my long tubes in my car, he infact has Hotcam/ported heads/gears....
But i love the exhaust note from long tube motors though.
Installed a set of LG Pro LT's on my C5 and gained nearly 25 lb-ft across the board. Yes they were expensive ($1800 with cats), but they are the best headers available.
I know it's not an LT1, but you cannot generalize that "LT loose (sic) torque at low speed". It's simply not true. A properly designed long-tube header will flow better across the entire RPM band. I'd be interested to see somebody do a header comparison on a stock car- Hooker LT's, TPIS LT's, shorty's, and stock and see the difference (cats included). I suspect the performance gains will be directly proportional to the price:
Stock
Shorty's
Hooker
TPIS
Last edited by Umrswimr; Mar 2, 2006 at 10:54 AM.





I would expect to gain no low-rpm torque with them, but I wouldnt expect to notice any loss in low-end feel either, though theoretically it could show on a dyno I doubt it will. If you have changed gears and are changing cams then you need to go ahead and put the longtubes on, because then you'll definitely notice the power gain.
Last edited by vader86; Mar 2, 2006 at 11:12 AM.
Installed a set of LG Pro LT's on my C5 and gained nearly 25 lb-ft across the board. Yes they were expensive ($1800 with cats), but they are the best headers available.
I know it's not an LT1, but you cannot generalize that "LT loose (sic) torque at low speed". It's simply not true. A properly designed long-tube header will flow better across the entire RPM band. I'd be interested to see somebody do a header comparison on a stock car- Hooker LT's, TPIS LT's, shorty's, and stock and see the difference (cats included). I suspect the performance gains will be directly proportional to the price:
Stock
Shorty's
Hooker
TPIS
I know LG in dallas, Tx they make quality headers but those are good for C5 vettes its totally different world when it comes to LT1 cars.
anyway how is ur new 95 LT1 car.
I know LG in dallas, Tx they make quality headers but those are good for C5 vettes its totally different world when it comes to LT1 cars.
anyway how is ur new 95 LT1 car.




I know LG in dallas, Tx they make quality headers but those are good for C5 vettes its totally different world when it comes to LT1 cars.
anyway how is ur new 95 LT1 car.
Will a 1 3/4" header be fully utilized on an otherwise stock street car? Probably not. But I usually subscribe to the "If I'm gonna do it, I might as well do it right.." theory because I might change my mind later and bolt a friggin' supercharger and ported heads on there. It'd suck to have to take my now restrictive shorty's off, sell them at a loss, and have done twice as much work.
I know they're more expensive, they're a bit more of a hassle, and the perfomance gain might not be large in a stock car, but the potential is there if you further modify your car.
How's my new 95? I simply love driving it. Once I get the engine balance/vibration issue addressed, I'll be heading to the track and see how it handles. I'm actually quite suprised at the suspension performance- even the FE1 suspension feeels extremely capable. The shocks need a little fine-tuning, but otherwise it seems almost as capable as my Z06 and koni-equipped C5. Which is a good thing.




I can literally scare women and children away with my C5, and it's completely smog legal.




I just had SW Lt's installed on my otherwise stock 95 DD and man what a sotp difference
. With no change to my 3.07 gear there is a noticable difference from 1500 to 4000 rpm. I am really glad that I did it. My next step will be port/polish and a mild street cam but that will have to wait a while til I can save up some more $$
I think that the impact of LTs on an LTx engine is if anything more pronounced than on the older C4. I'll bet however that Sammi is running headers with 1 3/4 primaries.





"Doing it right" may mean sticking with the shortys for your stock motor....then going to 1 3/4" LTs when you do a heads/SC on the engine.
If you do the heads/SC, "doing it right" would be installing LT during those mods, not weeks/month/years before.
Optimum engines, in whatever state of tune, are a package, with all the components chosen to work together....not chosen to work with a different combo that you may do sometime in the future. Do you see where that's coming from?
Larry
code5coupe




"Doing it right" may mean sticking with the shortys for your stock motor....then going to 1 3/4" LTs when you do a heads/SC on the engine.
If you do the heads/SC, "doing it right" would be installing LT during those mods, not weeks/month/years before.
Optimum engines, in whatever state of tune, are a package, with all the components chosen to work together....not chosen to work with a different combo that you may do sometime in the future. Do you see where that's coming from?
Larry
code5coupe






