Help - timing question for tuners...





The mechanic that built the engine for my '87 (383 - see sig), put it on a dyno and burned a chip for it. He advised me that the best numbers were made with BASE timing set at 17 degrees advance. (FYI - the cam has 4 degrees built in).
While this number seems a lot higher than most of what I've read on the forum, it truly did start up and run it's best with base timing (EST disconnected) set at 17 degrees advanced. I tried to bring it down, but the engine would start to run worse and die by 10 - 12 degrees, so I set it at 17.
Anyway - the original chip that came with the engine was far from ideal, and was really only tweaked for WOT. Long story short, after talking to TJ (Wong), I went with a Formato chip and it is much closer.
My question is (FINALLY :o ) - Is the base timing something that would / should be specific to each individual tune, and therefore need to vary with each tune?
Or, based on my engine combination and how it runs with the EST disconnected, should it always be set at 17 degrees (which is where it seems most comfortable, no matter what chip I put in)? Then I would just need to deal with the additional advance built into the chip, etc.
Hopefully I made some type of sense...





Like you stated, it is my understanding that the base timing is a global starting figure that the programmed timing in the chip would be added to.
Is my thinking correct?
Thanks for your help!!
Dan
Is my thinking correct?
Thanks for your help!!
Dan
Was your cam installed 4* retarded? If it was, maybe that accounts for it wanting so much advance to idle.





The strange thing is, at what appears to be 17 degrees base timing, it starts right up (though it runs very rich at cold, open loop idle), and once it enters closed loop, seems to idle / run really well. Even at WOT, it runs strong. Data logs show total timing at 40 degrees at WOT, but that's with the ECM thinking base timing is 6. Is there any way this thing would run (and not blow up!) at 51 degrees TOTAL timing at WOT?
40-why do you doubt that? and finally, I do believe timing is related to each individual build and tune.





Isn't the 40 degree data log figure a product of the ECM, "thinking" (based on the bin file) that base timing is at 6, and adding 34 degrees of programmed / actual advance? So if my base timing is truly at 17, wouldn't the ECM still add the programmed 34 degrees of advance to bring TTL timing to 51 degrees? (So long as there were no knock counts, etc that would cause the ECM to retard the timing any).
Would it even run (and not blow up!) at 51 degrees total advance (if, in fact, it truly was that number)?
Like Morley said - something is definitely screwy here. I guess the bottom line is that I should just go with what the engine likes and where it starts/idles/runs best. I had it out on Sunday and it has no trouble hazing the tires in 1st and 2nd (had to back off after that - don't want to exceed the speed limit), and there was no audible knock, so I suppose it's at least close to where it needs to be.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts





After talking with TJ, I think I'll be getting into programming myself. With my combo, it is probably the only way to get it dialed in accurately. I'll be sure to post pictures of the mushroom cloud created when my car explodes
I'll be looking. You know Bye, I've never had any dealings with TJ or Alvin. But with guys like that and Morley, I think anythingcan be worked out on these. Got my laptop today and I hope Morley
can help me get it up and running Craig Moates. I really have to fight the URGE to modify-but I've had my fun. I just want to be able to scan my motor and maybe make a few improvements, like 600 RWHP-nooooo,
got to fight it. Although a bottle of laughing gas and lt headers wouldn't be-oh no, there I go again, Bye





Rick - glad to hear you finally got your lap top. Whenever you get the urge for more horsepower, please do a search for all threads started by "byebyeL98" - that oughtta kill the urge real quick
Morley - it is a brand new ATI super damper, so it should be ok. I do have an adjustable pointer, but it only adjusts up to 4 degrees and it is in the middle, so it wouldn't account for the type of timing figures I'm seeing.
I didn't read in your previous post about fouled plugs. Take a good look at them-melted electrodes, white insulators are symptoms of preignition-caused by advanced timing amonst other things like a lean condition.
Last edited by rick lambert; Mar 29, 2006 at 12:31 PM.





Needless to say, I am an EXPERT at changing the plugs, and with the TPIS headers, it actually isn't too bad at all.





I'll take another stab (perhaps literally) at the car again this weekend. Should be interesting...







