When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
if i lower the rear only will it be too obvious?
or is it no even worth it?
How low do you want to go in the rear? How high is the front? I havent seen a pic of your car!!! It all comes down to your opinion really, you can lower the back as much as you like and its up to you weather you like the looks or practicality of it or not, but in terms of handling, i would reckon youd want the front slightly lower
Ok, i just looked at the pics of your car(looks quite nice by the way, i like it ), i reckon you may be able to drop the rear about 1/2 an inch without it looking too bad, you can always revert any changes to the rear very easily if youre not happy with them
The pads you are referring are the triangular ones at the very ends of the springs at the lower control arm??
When you say 'cutting 1/4" ' are you referring to the thickness of these triangular pads?
Mine (a 90 vert ) are not thik more that an half inch....
So to cut 1/4" i have to cut in half the original thick?
Thanks
-Beppe-
Beppe, if I recall correctly mine were about 1/2" thick and rectangular/squarish. I cut it approximately in half. On mine it had two pieces of steel? in the rubber I cut between the two.
Ok, i just looked at the pics of your car(looks quite nice by the way, i like it ), i reckon you may be able to drop the rear about 1/2 an inch without it looking too bad, you can always revert any changes to the rear very easily if youre not happy with them
thanks for the info
thanks for the compliment you can't tell by the pics but the car is about a 50 footer
When I first looked at that photo something didn't seem right too me but it's been a few years since I last lowered a C4 and now after dropping my lower control arms to replace some ball joint boots I realized what was wrong...the wedges are supposed to be glued to the bottom side of the crossmember not the top of the spring..that's definetely a problem. I looked at my wedges today that were installed at Guldstrand back in `86 and they still look fine...the've never come loose or let the spring rub in 60k miles..Guldstrand were the guys that originally developed those and then everybody ripped the design of them off over the years and I guess that's okay but they should include correct installation instructions with them...you need to glue them to the crossmember not the spring and you should be okay..
I was going to put coilovers up front..but this thread got me thinking so...I heated the steel caps on the top of the rubber pads on top of my spring,that released the epoxy or whatever adhesive holds it on the rubber and they popped off.Then I used a razor knife and sliced the rubber(while pulling the loose end away from the knife with pliers)away from the stock upper pads.Then I marked the rubber to 1/2 inch and using a belt sander took them down to the final mark.Took all of 45 minutes.Used a belt sander and coarse paper and it worked the same on the ends.I dont see the point of taking all the stock rubber off only to glue more on when you can leave the original and just trim it.
I think you could even epoxy the stock metal caps back on to the modified pads if you felt it necessary.Just my experience if it helps anyone..
From: San Diego , CA Double Yellow DirtBags 1985..Z51..6-speed
Originally Posted by eguyett1985
the wedges are supposed to be glued to the bottom side of the crossmember not the top of the spring..that's definetely a problem.
That's not true. Whether or not its the best way to do it, the instructions say glue to the spring. Otherwise you're putting a very localized stress on the spring.
That's not true. Whether or not its the best way to do it, the instructions say glue to the spring. Otherwise you're putting a very localized stress on the spring.
my kit stated to glue the wedges to the spring too!
Speaking of stress/wear on the spring I remember some threads where a member told people to lower the front without a lowering kit. I believe his method was to leave the spring loose in the mounting brackets where the spring would ride against the cross member w/o wedges. I thought he would have chimed in by now!
I believe his method was to leave the spring loose in the mounting brackets where the spring would ride against the cross member w/o wedges. I thought he would have chimed in by now!
Mike
I wouldnt think thats a good idea..... Would be abit noisy too wouldnt it?
If the wedges had a larger 'footprint' to glue onto the spring the chance of movement would be less....
Also the glue preferably would be RTV. The spring is in constant flex/movement and something rigid such as epoxy won't remain glued for long. The glue needs to 'move' with the spring surface.
From: San Diego , CA Double Yellow DirtBags 1985..Z51..6-speed
Originally Posted by aboatguy
Speaking of stress/wear on the spring I remember some threads where a member told people to lower the front without a lowering kit. I believe his method was to leave the spring loose in the mounting brackets where the spring would ride against the cross member w/o wedges. I thought he would have chimed in by now!
Mike
And I recall responding him telling him he was an idiot. Maybe his spring broke and put him off a cliff somewhere.
Central Coaster, I just got my new lowering kit today, I did not buy the clamp kit from Mid America the first time and you state that you think this is why the wedges came off. Could you possibly post some pics of your install this time with the clamp? It's been so long since I lowered mine I can't remember where the MAD clamps go. I do still have my aluminum spacers so I am going to order the clamp kit from MAD now.
Sorry to be a bother.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.