C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

failed emissions again... suggestions?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-30-2006, 02:33 PM
  #21  
toptechx6
Safety Car
 
toptechx6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 3,629
Received 25 Likes on 22 Posts

Default weight vs percentage

The grams per mile measurement seems harder for me to understand than percentage, probably because all shop equipment uses PPM and it is hard to visualize the weight of a gas. I'm told when correcting to that standard for repairing failures the first step is to run a baseline with your 5 gas analyzer, then just work for improvement since you cannot measure directly in GPM.
Old 07-30-2006, 02:59 PM
  #22  
bogus
Team Owner
 
bogus's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: San Pedro CA
Posts: 40,144
Received 33 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CFI-EFI
In my state, at least, the standards vary with the year of the car. That is why the standard for the '78, HD, truck are so much higher than the '84, car. The standards for for an '85, here, may be the sames as Thrak has to meet. Second, it is pretty obvious that your standards, at least the HCs, are expressed in different units of measure (grams per mile?). The HCs we are discussing are in parts per million (ppm). The CO is stated as a percentage (%) of all the exhaust gases. I don't know what the units of measure of Thrak's NOx standards.

RACE ON!!!
it sounds like your state is following the federal standards... 1981 had a change in those standards, so pre 81 were higher.

As for the corvette in question... It is running fat, but why is a good question. I would scan that thing, and watch what the O2 is doing.

Also, if the valves are gummy, they may be causing some leakage. You may try running a can of SeaFoam through it. It won't hurt, and it might help.

Take a can of carb cleaner, and hit each of the various intake joints to check if there are leaks... if so, the engine will idle up.

As suggested, check timing.
Old 07-30-2006, 04:54 PM
  #23  
CTYANK2
Cruising is the passion!
Support Corvetteforum!
 
CTYANK2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2003
Location: SIMSBURY CT
Posts: 6,140
Received 304 Likes on 213 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20-'21-'22-'23-'24


Default

Originally Posted by CFI-EFI
In my state, at least, the standards vary with the year of the car. That is why the standard for the '78, HD, truck are so much higher than the '84, car. The standards for for an '85, here, may be the sames as Thrak has to meet. Second, it is pretty obvious that your standards, at least the HCs, are expressed in different units of measure (grams per mile?). The HCs we are discussing are in parts per million (ppm). The CO is stated as a percentage (%) of all the exhaust gases. I don't know what the units of measure of Thrak's NOx standards.

RACE ON!!!
HC and NOX here in Connecticut are definitely PPM. C0 is a % but I can't say for sure if it is a % of total gases.
Old 07-30-2006, 06:48 PM
  #24  
CFI-EFI
Race Director
 
CFI-EFI's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: The Top of Utah
Posts: 17,298
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CTYANK2
HC and NOX here in Connecticut are definitely PPM. C0 is a % but I can't say for sure if it is a % of total gases.
Are you saying that if I moved to Connecticut, my 1984 would have to have HCs no greater than 0.88 parts per million, where the federal, and my current state standards are 220.00 parts per million? That means my new standard would 4 tenths of one percent (.88 ÷ 220 = 0.004 or .4%) of my current standard... for the same car. Excuse me, if I say, I don't believe that.

RACE ON!!!
Old 07-30-2006, 07:30 PM
  #25  
CTYANK2
Cruising is the passion!
Support Corvetteforum!
 
CTYANK2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2003
Location: SIMSBURY CT
Posts: 6,140
Received 304 Likes on 213 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20-'21-'22-'23-'24


Default

Originally Posted by CFI-EFI
Are you saying that if I moved to Connecticut, my 1984 would have to have HCs no greater than 0.88 parts per million, where the federal, and my current state standards are 220.00 parts per million? That means my new standard would 4 tenths of one percent (.88 ÷ 220 = 0.004 or .4%) of my current standard... for the same car. Excuse me, if I say, I don't believe that.

RACE ON!!!
I'm just reading off my State of Connecticut Emissions test results from April 2006. Here it is........
Old 07-30-2006, 07:36 PM
  #26  
black_89_vette
Melting Slicks
 
black_89_vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2000
Location: Winchester Ontario
Posts: 2,466
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

If your 85 is the same as my 89, just disconnect the ESC wire by the brake booster. This will run your engine at base timing without computer control.

This little trick works wonders.
Old 07-30-2006, 07:54 PM
  #27  
zr1fred
Race Director

 
zr1fred's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Posts: 10,691
Received 71 Likes on 60 Posts

Default

We've had emissions here for 20+ years, and the FIRST thing we look at is the cat. If the car runs good and there is no check engine light, and if the cat is over five years old, it's probably the cat.
Old 07-30-2006, 08:04 PM
  #28  
CFI-EFI
Race Director
 
CFI-EFI's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: The Top of Utah
Posts: 17,298
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CTYANK2
I'm just reading off my State of Connecticut Emissions test results from April 2006. Here it is........
I can't read it. It didn't show up. It shows the standards for a 1984 car as that low? You know that the allowable standards DO change from time to time? I have heard of 49 state (federal) standards, California standards, but never the "Oh my goodness, Connecticut standards". Regardless of what you are reading or have to post, what you have stated is in error.

RACE ON!!
Old 07-30-2006, 08:23 PM
  #29  
CTYANK2
Cruising is the passion!
Support Corvetteforum!
 
CTYANK2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2003
Location: SIMSBURY CT
Posts: 6,140
Received 304 Likes on 213 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20-'21-'22-'23-'24


Default

Originally Posted by CFI-EFI
I can't read it. It didn't show up. It shows the standards for a 1984 car as that low? You know that the allowable standards DO change from time to time? I have heard of 49 state (federal) standards, California standards, but never the "Oh my goodness, Connecticut standards". Regardless of what you are reading or have to post, what you have stated is in error.

RACE ON!!
The test was on my 89. If you can't see the picture I posted send me a PM with your e-mail address and I will e-mail it to you.
Old 07-30-2006, 10:25 PM
  #30  
Thrak
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Thrak's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Canton GA
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well, I got under the car tonight, and low and behold.. the pipes after the cat are a normal red/rusty color... the front left and right downtubes are the same color, but where they meet (about 8-10" before the cat) is ALL freakin charred black... I mean it looks like there was a fire under it, that kind of black.

Looks like its the cat... so what brand do you guys suggest for a basically stock car, that wont break the bank?

Last edited by Thrak; 07-30-2006 at 11:21 PM.
Old 07-31-2006, 01:02 AM
  #31  
NocarbutaVetteforme
Drifting
 
NocarbutaVetteforme's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2002
Location: Corinth TX
Posts: 1,945
Received 41 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bogus
it sounds like your state is following the federal standards... 1981 had a change in those standards, so pre 81 were higher.

As for the corvette in question... It is running fat, but why is a good question. I would scan that thing, and watch what the O2 is doing.

Also, if the valves are gummy, they may be causing some leakage. You may try running a can of SeaFoam through it. It won't hurt, and it might help.

Take a can of carb cleaner, and hit each of the various intake joints to check if there are leaks... if so, the engine will idle up.

As suggested, check timing.
I recently did the intake maifold gasket changeout for an oil leak and when I did I cleaned the whole intake pretty damn good. Well, once completed the car ran pretty damn good but just for *&%$ and grins I added some seafoam. It didn't smoke that much but I will tell you this, the car sounds like a new car. In fact it runs so damn smooth and the idle is incredible. I would what Bogus suggested and run a can of Seafoam through the car and see if it makes a difference. I still can't get over how much of a difference that can made. The car actually idles so quiet it is hard to hear it running if you aren't real close to the car.
Old 07-31-2006, 03:55 AM
  #32  
sami85L98
Le Mans Master
 
sami85L98's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Scarborough ONTARIO
Posts: 8,077
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Thrak
Well, I got under the car tonight, and low and behold.. the pipes after the cat are a normal red/rusty color... the front left and right downtubes are the same color, but where they meet (about 8-10" before the cat) is ALL freakin charred black... I mean it looks like there was a fire under it, that kind of black.

Looks like its the cat... so what brand do you guys suggest for a basically stock car, that wont break the bank?

Thrak, i bought cat from mid america for my 85 vette and its basically like a OEM style i did not see anything hig perf in thier CAT, infact i compared it side by side with RT cat, a huge big diff the honey comb holes were bigger in RT cat than Mid america, When i changed my original CAT man it was so dirty and it was in pieces chunk pieces from inside. If u would like to borrow mine not a problem only if u have a 85 vette, mine fit only 85 vettes. Give me a call 404 822 8070 there is one on fairburn rd, douglasville X 34 on I 20. i know that guy he probably help u out in this case.

check my sig for mods with mid america CAT i passed GA emmission recently.

sami.

Last edited by sami85L98; 07-31-2006 at 03:58 AM.
Old 07-31-2006, 05:33 AM
  #33  
toptechx6
Safety Car
 
toptechx6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 3,629
Received 25 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Thrak
Well, I got under the car tonight, and low and behold.. the pipes after the cat are a normal red/rusty color... the front left and right downtubes are the same color, but where they meet (about 8-10" before the cat) is ALL freakin charred black... I mean it looks like there was a fire under it, that kind of black.

Looks like its the cat... so what brand do you guys suggest for a basically stock car, that wont break the bank?
Thrak, sorry to hear the damned cat looks bad. Nice offer by sami85L98 who is close by, hope that helps get you passed. Let us know how the next test goes, best of luck.
Old 07-31-2006, 08:57 AM
  #34  
Thrak
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Thrak's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Canton GA
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Awesome Sami!! I'll be giving you call this evening!


I've been a seafoam user for years... use it in all my cars. I'm very well aware of how awesome a product it is. I've already ran 2 or 3 cans thru it (intake, gas tank, oil, etc) so that motor is really clean haha.

Thanks for everyones help! I'll update after the next test.
Old 07-31-2006, 09:10 AM
  #35  
anesthes
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: Salem NH
Posts: 4,274
Received 135 Likes on 100 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CFI-EFI
Regardless of what you are reading or have to post, what you have stated is in error.
How do you know?

-- Joe
Old 07-31-2006, 09:14 AM
  #36  
zr1fred
Race Director

 
zr1fred's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Posts: 10,691
Received 71 Likes on 60 Posts

Default

What's this seafoam?
Old 07-31-2006, 11:45 AM
  #37  
CFI-EFI
Race Director
 
CFI-EFI's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: The Top of Utah
Posts: 17,298
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by anesthes
How do you know?

-- Joe
Common sense. There is NO way one given car will have a smog standard in one state that allows less than one half of one percent the HC emissions, of the another state.

RACE ON!!!

Get notified of new replies

To failed emissions again... suggestions?

Old 07-31-2006, 11:57 AM
  #38  
CFI-EFI
Race Director
 
CFI-EFI's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: The Top of Utah
Posts: 17,298
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CTYANK2
The test was on my 89. If you can't see the picture I posted send me a PM with your e-mail address and I will e-mail it to you.
This time it wasn't there again, but after I read this quoted post, I scanned back up and your test results showed up. A couple of points. I don't see the standards to the 1984, which I posted or the 1985, which Thrak posted. On what authority do you contend that 1984, 1985, and 1989 smog standards are the same? Also, maybe there is something I can't see on your test, but that looks like HC Limit, 88 PPM. Not
Originally Posted by CTYANK2
Well at least the emission standards there are reasonable. Limits here in Connecticut are:

HC: 0.88
CO: 0.28
Nox: 614
Again, unless your picture is not clear, the HC limit that you cite is 1\100th of the true limit.

RACE ON!!!
Old 07-31-2006, 12:24 PM
  #39  
CTYANK2
Cruising is the passion!
Support Corvetteforum!
 
CTYANK2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2003
Location: SIMSBURY CT
Posts: 6,140
Received 304 Likes on 213 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20-'21-'22-'23-'24


Default

Opps, I see it now, typo! My original post should have been 88, not 0.88 for HC's. Also, I guess you are saying there are different limits for 84 and 89 Corvettes in Georgia but I am unaware of any distinction like that here in CT.

88 is about 40% lower than what Thrak posted for Georgai HC limit (152 or so). Anyway, the original point, and only point, is that the levels here are much stricter than Georgia.
Old 07-31-2006, 02:14 PM
  #40  
CFI-EFI
Race Director
 
CFI-EFI's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: The Top of Utah
Posts: 17,298
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CTYANK2
Also, I guess you are saying there are different limits for 84 and 89 Corvettes in Georgia but I am unaware of any distinction like that here in CT.
Not just Georgia. These are federal EPA numbers; not Georgia's, not Utah's, and not Connecticut's. Check! You will find that Connecticut has different limits for different years. Look at the different standards for my truck and my car.

Originally Posted by CTYANK2
88 is about 40% lower than what Thrak posted for Georgai HC limit (152 or so). Anyway, the original point, and only point, is that the levels here are much stricter than Georgia.
Thrak posted 152 ppm HCs as the limit for the high speed test and 157 ppm as the limit for the idle test. Your NEW number of 88 is 58% of Thrak's high speed test, and 56% of his idle test limits. NOT less than one half of one percent of my limits.

"Anyway, the original point, and only point, is that the levels here are much stricter than Georgia.". I don't even believe THAT. I don't know the standards for either state, but I'll bet you're wrong. I WILL agree that the standards for his 1985 are not as strict as they are for your 1989.

RACE ON!!!


Quick Reply: failed emissions again... suggestions?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:37 PM.