When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
PCV is goods as far as I know. Took one of of another LT1 with no change in engine performance. Builder took intake off and resealed because plugs were fouled and continued to be wet until I changed the exhaust manifolds to Hooker headers. But still still have an almost constant flow of smoke out the exhaust.
Builder says he loves the Total seal rings and loves the 230 compression. Says he has put many sets on.
Even more reason to cast a doubt on the builder. That cranking compression of 230 psi is a definite tip off to a problem. It is more than likely with the camshaft and it's installation.
Even more reason to cast a doubt on the builder. That cranking compression of 230 psi is a definite tip off to a problem. It is more than likely with the camshaft and it's installation.
It's not that you have too much compression.......it's that you have it at the wrong time. Your cam overlap should have reduced the compression down significantly.
I have seen oil control problems that couldnt be verified with a leakdown test. I think the extra oil around the top 2 rings interferes with the test. Now if it had a groove wore in the cyl wall from a broke ring, that would surely show up. Also, Ive seen oil ring problems that cause oil control issues, and a leakdown will never tell you anything about an oil ring. The dead ringer is if its got a bunch of blow-by. If not I would be looking elsewhere for the oil prob.
I agree; I offered the suggestion simply as one more piece of data to consider before tearing it down.
I'm not familiar with the LT4 hot cam as I've never used one, but I too am suspicious of the compression numbers. It doesn't explain the excessive oil consumption, though.
That being said, I'm also suspicious of having soft rings considering the amount of compression it's building - assuming the compression numbers are consistent across the board. Perhaps a valve seal(s) got shredded during assembly?
Crankcase pressure. Pull out the PCV and see if it puffs smoke out the hole. You can also check for crankcase vacuum at the same grommet. Ive seen bad enough intake leaks that there was actually enough vacuum to show several inches on a vacuum gauge. It would also show up on a scanner. If it had an intake leak on one side it would have much higher fuel trim #s on the leaking side due to the unmetered air.
Even more reason to cast a doubt on the builder. That cranking compression of 230 psi is a definite tip off to a problem. It is more than likely with the camshaft and it's installation.
RACE ON!!!
383,SRP forged pistons, probably flat top single eyebrow, lt4 cam. I dont think 230 is out of the question.
Even if the rings weren't seated? a quart of oil every 300 miles is sure going somewhere! I'd like to watch him do his compression test. I'm kinda wondering if he hasn't got a broken ring in there?
Even if the rings weren't seated? a quart of oil every 300 miles is sure going somewhere! I'd like to watch him do his compression test. I'm kinda wondering if he hasn't got a broken ring in there?
383,SRP forged pistons, probably flat top single eyebrow, lt4 cam. I dont think 230 is out of the question.
It should be out of the question for any non pure race, car. The compression ratio only has a minor effect on the cranking pressures. It is the cam timing that has the greater effect. If the cam isn't defective, I'll bet it is mis-installed. That has nothing to do with the oil consumption, however.
I've seen 9:1 motors with baby cams have 230 psi cranking. I've also seen 12.5:1 motors with racing cams have 175 psi cranking. We dont place too much value in the actual #s, more in that they're all the same. For diagnostic purposes its more about HOW it makes compression, usually first pulse amount. Leak down testing is also very valuable info, but not really pertinent (typo?) here. I think we're on the wrong path here. I'd definately like to see some scan data. Whats the fuel trim #s? if it pings on 100 octane, its got serious problems. I could see the quench area being an issue, but its definately not too much comp.
The compression ratio only has a minor effect on the cranking pressures. It is the cam timing that has the greater effect. That has nothing to do with the oil consumption, however.