MAF Help Needed
Last edited by All2kool; Nov 24, 2006 at 02:22 PM.
From what I recently read, the BOSCH is the way to go, since it had a burn-off circuit that the ACDelco version doesn't have.
I'd say that if the engine is running fine, I wouldn't be concerned. If you do decide to buy another MAF, you may want to consider doing what I did, hit the salvage yards and pick up one off a 'F' body (Camaro, Trans Am, etc.) for $50. They're interchangable and mine has worked fine for going on three years now.
A new one will give you "sticker shock".
Jake
Last edited by JAKE; Nov 20, 2006 at 05:59 PM.
From what I recently read, the BOSCH is the way to go, since it had a burn-off circuit that the ACDelco version doesn't have.
I'd say that if the engine is running fine, I wouldn't be concerned. If you do decide to buy another MAF, you may want to consider doing what I did, hit the salvage yards and pick up one off a 'F' body (Camaro, Trans Am, etc.) for $50. They're interchangable and mine has worked fine for going on three years now.
A new one will give you "sticker shock".
Jake
Raping an F-Body is what I'll do. Are the 305 and 350 TPI's interchangeable?
Kinda like if someone owned a vette and put in 32# injectors in a completely stock engine...and didn't inform the person who bought it.
Last edited by rick lambert; Nov 20, 2006 at 08:13 PM.
Raping an F-Body is what I'll do. Are the 305 and 350 TPI's interchangeable?
So I hit the salvage yard and bought one off a 350 TPI Camaro and it's the same one I'm still running. FIFTY BUCKS.
I never tried one off a 305, but I suspect it will work just as well. The MAF doesn't know (or even care for that matter) how many cubes are behind it.
For example, when I pulled the 350 and installed my current engine, which is a 415 CID, I used the same MAF without a hitch. Sure, I had to have the ECM re-programmed, but the MAF remained unaltered.
The difference between a 305 and a 350 is 45 cubic inches; the difference between a 350 and a 415 is 65 cubic inches - see what I mean?
Hope this helps.
Jake
Last edited by JAKE; Nov 21, 2006 at 12:15 PM.
http://contemporarycorvette.com/
I have a Micro-Tech MAF myself, but the calibration was way off compared to the Bosch MAF it replaced. I posted some threads awhile back on the calibration effort required to get mine close.
It was ok in the idle region, but the error grows as the flow increases and it tended to to overestimate the flow considerably off idle and above.
You never know what you're gonna get with an aftermarket maf, so expect to have some tuning issues.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Last edited by All2kool; Nov 22, 2006 at 11:43 AM.
I feel like GM purposely put a MAF on my car just so it can stall daily. Needless to say, I sold that Microtech MAF since I'll never be needing it again. Hate me hate me hate me!
I feel like GM purposely put a MAF on my car just so it can stall daily. Needless to say, I sold that Microtech MAF since I'll never be needing it again. Hate me hate me hate me!
Hmmmm thats very interesting, I wonder if anyone else out there has done this... I would very much like to hear from them about it...
101st Airborne
For the last 2,500 miles I've run without one, I've had nothing but superb performance, drivability and reliability all along. A/F tuning was hit on the head of the nail. 12.5:1 A/F ratio on WOT.Technically, you shouldn't even need a tune to run a MAFless tune if you are using the stock TPI intake. Just make sure you have no vacuum leaks whatsoever as that will make your car virtually undrivable. Throttle input is generated through your TPS. The ECM uses signals from the TPS to generate a simulated MAF signal.
I actually ran quite well 15 minutes ago with my stock prom. But that SES was on all the time...
I needed a tune mainly to turn off that SES light for the lack of a MAF, removal of VATS, EGR and special fuel enrichment due to the fact I have a Miniram and not a stock TPI intake. On a stock tune I'd run slightly lean at 13.6:1 A/F on higher rpms, high load (cell 15) simply because the Miniram flows significantly more air at higher rpms.



There's nothing wrong with a little innovation.


Then it's off to arbitration, and a fine if they determine the car could be repaired by replacing a failed part. (why would you take it off anyway unless it failed)
Too much hassle, and not worth it. I'd rather hide my mods from the feds

That is a bloody rice burner air filter attachment on there!!! Why is there a coil there in the middle of the fuel rail?? Did you nab that from an unreliable LT1?
That is a bloody rice burner air filter attachment on there!!!
The fuel rail is the most secure location.
The fuel rail is the most secure location.












