When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
A K&N does not filter as well as a good Fram, so expect a dirty intake. K&N is not what it is cracked up to be. Invest the money in Supreme gas instead.
I beg to differ. Don't make me dig up my offroading photos of K&N filters that actually do their job compared to paper filters.
The K&N filters have been PROVEN to filter better when they get dirty.
They have been proven to FLOW BETTER when they are DIRTY.
When they are CLEAN they don't filter as well and DON"T flow any better than a clean paper filter.
Recap:
1) They don't 'outflow' a clean paper filter
2) They do outflow a dirty paper filter (a clean paper filter will too)
3) THey don't filter better than a paper filter they filter 'less'
4) THey FILTER better the dirtier they get (Paper Filter Does Too)
5) K&N depends on being 'oiled' correctly to work correctly (Paper Filter doesn't need oiling)
How many of us EVER run a dirty filter on our Vettes?
None of us would be my best guess.
So... if you aren't going to do regular maintenance and change your filter then the K&N is the one for U.
Otherwise, buy yourself THREE paper filters and 1/2 tank of gas with the K&N money.
Back on topic... Someone on a different message board I visit said he used a K&N in 1994 Impala SS with the LT-1 mill. The airflow through the filter picked up a small amount of oil and coated the O2 sensor, giving the engine chip a corrupt reading. This was discovered when the car was being dyno tuned. Anyone ever hear of this problem?
Wow. This is happening to me now. I noticed a 40HP drop on my 2004 LS6 engine during my last dyno. The only thing that has changed is staight piped the cats and cleaning the air filter with k&n oil. I believe that the oil is the problem. In fact, we are seeing strange air mixture ratios at high RPMs. I have replaced the filter and cleaned the Mass airflow sensor. Planning to re dyno in two days.
Back on topic... Someone on a different message board I visit said he used a K&N in 1994 Impala SS with the LT-1 mill. The airflow through the filter picked up a small amount of oil and coated the O2 sensor, giving the engine chip a corrupt reading. This was discovered when the car was being dyno tuned. Anyone ever hear of this problem?
I had a similar experience, only the K&N oil coated the MAF wires.
I installed a new K&N out of the box, with factory applied oiling, on my 86. A while later, maybe a month or so, I had Diacom hooked up and running and noticed my BLMs readings were at 108.
Next came several days of trying to figure out why they had changed so dramatically from the 126/130 readings I had been getting. After checking all I could think of, I finally removed the MAF and sprayed the sensor wires with carb cleaner.
BLMs returned to normal.
I then removed the K&N, washed off the factory applied oil and re-installed it without any oil. I checked several times over a period of a few months and the low BLM problem never returned.
I can only attribute the low BLM readings to the oil on the filter migrating to the MAF wiring. I'd never had a BLM problem before installing the K&N.
I see this from time to time...simple explanation is he over oiled his filter...more oil is not better but some don't realize it...it will gum up your TB and wreck havoc with your IAC as well...
Repeat after me..."do not over oil my K & N".....
This is one of the same type responses I received when I first posted about my problem on this Forum a couple of years ago.
You must remember, I installed my K&N air filter right out of the box; no oiling was done by me.
I had a similar experience, only the K&N oil coated the MAF wires.
I installed a new K&N out of the box, with factory applied oiling, on my 86. A while later, maybe a month or so, I had Diacom hooked up and running and noticed my BLMs readings were at 108.
Next came several days of trying to figure out why they had changed so dramatically from the 126/130 readings I had been getting. After checking all I could think of, I finally removed the MAF and sprayed the sensor wires with carb cleaner.
BLMs returned to normal.
I then removed the K&N, washed off the factoru applied oil and re-installed it without any oil. I checked several times over a period of a few months and the low BLM problem never returned.
I can only attribute the low BLM readings to the oil on the filter migrating to the MAF wiring. I'd never had a BLM problem before installing the K&N.
Just my experience.
Jake
I don't get it. Did the filter oil affect the integrity of the wiring connections?
I don't get it. Did the filter oil affect the integrity of the wiring connections?
Best I can figure is the oil applied a coating to the MAF air sensor wires which lead to inaccurate data being sent to the ECM. Once I sprayed the wires and removed the coating, things went back to normal.
Readings were fine, then the K&N was installed and they went haywire. I cleaned the MAF wires and removed the oil from the filter and things went back to normal.
I'm still running the K&N but without any oil and the problem hasn't recurred.
Of course, what would you expect K&N to say when questioned about the problem the oil causes; it's all about reputation and sales. Would you honestly expect them to say "Yes, our oiled filters causes MAF equipped cars to experience problems"? To do that would effectively remove them from the "MAF" market and there are literally millions of MAF equipped cars on the road, not just Vettes either.
Yes, bingo that happens I run the K&N set up on my 96LT4 6 speed. It makes a difference it can coat the sensor, but you need to maintain it, yes the car is quicker, it gets more air, but if you get rid of the according to the valve body you will see some interesting increase inperformance as well.
I dumped my K&N and open lid to the basement of my house over a year ago. IMHO its not worth the cost, nor the headache, for a street driven modified car. Its made a cool noise and that was just about it.
I got it to begin with when I joined the forum, and read all these dumb threads from folks who just installed them and really had no idea what they were talking about. Such is life on the CF at times. Then you learn.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.