When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
plenum style intake lean rear cylinders a problem ?
hi there ,
i have heard along the lines that plenum intake styles like mini ram,super ram ,stealth ram e.c.t that have long plenum box can tend to give the rear cyliders a lean type of tune!
as the front first cylinders grab the fresh /cold air first and then the rear cylinders get whats left of it !
if so how can you over come this problem please?
is there any way of fixing this problem at all such as a custom tune/chip or some thing else may be ?
would rear cylinders that are running leaner than the front ones be bad as far as all round performance is concerned ?
what do you guys think about this,is it really much of a problem ?
hope to hear soon some facts/comments on this please.
when you see those 8 throttle body seperate style intakes that each have there own t/b they are all getting the same amount of fresh air arent they so there fore it is a much better tune/run.
thanks
tyson
Last edited by prism_kiter; Aug 1, 2007 at 07:12 AM.
From: Portsmouth Virginia 396LT4 435RWHP/400RWTQ Best so far 11.26 @ 123mph
I think you mean to say less air to rear cylinders would be a richer not leaner condition. When I have injectors CC'd to check flow rate, I will usually put the lower flow rate ones in the rear cylinders since they do get robbed of some air. You will find a lot of injector sets, if checked, will have an acceptable 1 to 2 percent variation tolerance in flow unless you want to spend extra money on additional injectors and have them checked to get a matched set.
Rick
Change the firing order, which would require a cam ground as such. #5 and 7 steal air from eachother at high rpm but IMO I doubt youd experience a SOTP difference it you did . Lots of money spent for ???
cuisinartvette,
What is the deal with changing the firing order of # 5 and #7? I have heard it produces more HP. How could that be? Why hasn't Chevy done it if it works? Thanks.
cuisinartvette,
What is the deal with changing the firing order of # 5 and #7? I have heard it produces more HP. How could that be? Why hasn't Chevy done it if it works? Thanks.
Rich K
i would interested to hear more/know about this also ?
cheers
From: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Originally Posted by cuisinartvette
Change the firing order, which would require a cam ground as such. #5 and 7 steal air from eachother at high rpm but IMO I doubt youd experience a SOTP difference it you did . Lots of money spent for ???
I doubt changing the firing order as some suggest would help much. If you swap 4 and 7 (as another thread is hot and heavy on), you just shift the problem from 5&7 over to 8&7.
I'm in complete agreement with you on the poor cost/benefit ratio of this change.
From: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Originally Posted by thirdtimevetteowner
cuisinartvette,
What is the deal with changing the firing order of # 5 and #7? I have heard it produces more HP. How could that be? Why hasn't Chevy done it if it works? Thanks.
Rich K
Save your money. There's a thread about this in the C3 section.
I've been doing my own tuning on My 388 LT4 using the gen 7 dfi. Reading the plugs showed me clearly that the front was running lean, the middles normal and the rear rich. I know you're thinking lean but as someone pointed out less air and the same amount of fuel would equal a richer mixture.
I changed my plugs regularly on my 93 LT1 when it was stock with bolt ons. All the plugs read the same. My new 388 was spinning near 8k rpm and the plugs showed this condition every time. From my best guess, this becomes a problem only when you're rpming the motor beyond 6500 rpms.
I doubt changing the firing order as some suggest would help much. If you swap 4 and 7 (as another thread is hot and heavy on), you just shift the problem from 5&7 over to 8&7.
I'm in complete agreement with you on the poor cost/benefit ratio of this change.
I've seen dyno sheets where the rearranged firing order works... I think it was on a single plane manifold. I'm not sold on the idea for TPI or LT-1 style fuel injection.