When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I never knew one could run a 400 without using steam holes. And that's with no gasket problems, nonetheless overheating?
I'm in south Texas, new stock radiator and no problems..Never seen over 230 degs and that was short time...My average temps are 185-210degs...Motor was built 3 years ago, so far so good...Going to the drag strip today to rip it up
Who would have guessed? The 400 in my truck has had heads without steam holes for the last 15 to 20 years. It has never run hot.
RACE ON!!!
So why did GM decide steam holes were necessary on 1970-1980 400s then, if they truly weren't needed? Are you saying you could use just a regular SBC head gasket vs. a head gasket required specifically for 400s? Inquiring minds want to know...
So why did GM decide steam holes were necessary on 1970-1980 400s then, if they truly weren't needed? Are you saying you could use just a regular SBC head gasket vs. a head gasket required specifically for 400s? Inquiring minds want to know...
400's have a 4.125 bore, so the standard sbc gasket will not work for that reason.
So why did GM decide steam holes were necessary on 1970-1980 400s then, if they truly weren't needed? Are you saying you could use just a regular SBC head gasket vs. a head gasket required specifically for 400s? Inquiring minds want to know...
The 400 SBC was the first production block with siamesed cylinders, and the engineers at the time "thought" that air would get trapped in those areas and therefore needed a place to escape, thus the steam holes (and it would be a "water" passage, not a "steam" passage). That has proven either not to be the case, or not a problem if that in fact does occurr. GM has since built siamesed cylinder blocks w/o steam holes, as has the aftermarket.
So why did GM decide steam holes were necessary on 1970-1980 400s then, if they truly weren't needed?
Do you really expect me to explain the motivation for the actions of others??? Maybe I should cite why you've posted to this thread.
Originally Posted by hooblyboobly
Are you saying you could use just a regular SBC head gasket vs. a head gasket required specifically for 400s? Inquiring minds want to know...
I don't think I said that. If you think I did, please quote where. First maybe you should define "a regular SBC". Is a 305 "a regular SBC"? Is a 350 "a regular SBC". Do 305 and 350 head gaskets interchange? What, exactly, are you accusing me of having said??? hooblyboobly!
Eveyone should take a breath... Whew this isn't politics. The best part of this forum is people like all of you. I have learned a lot reading your wealth of knowledge. And not having to wade through all the egos. There is often more than one correct answer.
For more of a hot rod type of car that doesn't get used much except for playing around I wouldn't build anything under a 400. My current power plant is a 355 and even with fully ported Brodix heads all my friends still love the old 406 it replaced better for seat of the pants feeling....
I made a major mistake in my build (actually it was the builder, but I share the blame). He built me a 383 with an externally-balanced rotating assembly. This gave me the WORST of both worlds. PITA rotating assembly, but not the 406 cubic inches to make up for it. Anyway, it's in my car, running, without modifying the corssmember or anything. I picked up a forged, 153 tooth, externally balanced flywheel from a place in LA for $100 (they said they sell a lot of 'em to people who do this by accident). I also got a 6.75" externally balanced balancer from the same place for $60. I'm running a stock LT1 small starter, and everything nestled quite nicely into my engine bay.
When I get tired of the 383 I may build a 406+ for the car and slap the same flywheel/balancer on that...
2.) A 4+3 bellhousing CAN NOT BE CLEARANCED for a 400 flywheel
3.) A small internally balanced balancer CAN NOT BE BALANCED to a 400 crank
I think that's most of my personal issues on this one.
As for the 400 thing, a guy on the crossfire forum named Tom slapped a ported CFI intake on a bone-stock junkyard 400 and it ran fantastically well. Stock ECM, stock 400 engine, mildly ported CFI intake. Cubic inches are great...
before you get it in and all screwed together, check that your 400 block is not missing one starter mounting tapping for the 153 wheel, many are only tapped for the two ''big wheel'' starter bolts, not three tapped holes for universal 153/168t fit.
with an lt1 intake conversion, you can ''space out'' the motor mounts enuf to clear the 400 front balancer over the vette crossmember...my 409 (400+.o40) only needed abt 1/4'' rise...tPi would probly hit the hood.
a 30 lb nodular iron 153t flywheel, neutral balanced for a 350 2-pc, can easily be rebalanced to 400 external balance and lightened additionally...some are bolting weights to the 350/L88 15lb wheel to get 400 balance but i like having two feet -no thanks.
GM power book sez steam holes are not req'd for operation over 3000 rpm, but lower speed use should have steam holes.
3.) A small internally balanced balancer CAN NOT BE BALANCED to a 400 crank
Not a big deal but you can nuetral balance the front of the crank with MALLORY METAL and use a stock 350 internal balance damper, with an exernal balance rear
I was running an int balance 10.5:1 roller 383 with 215cc Iron eagles and a wide LSA camshaft with a tpi off an 86 vette. The only mods were a 58 mm throttle body, 30pph injectors, MSD 6A,a hot chip and an adj fuel press regulator. We advanced the cam 6 degrees and buddy the thottle response and torque was EXPLOSIVE. It did run out at 4000 rpm tho. But it didnt matter, I couldnt hook it up in an automatic/2.73 setup. If i had a locker, gears, and a torque converter man It woulda been fast. In my 92 camaro I was able to get 495 miles out of a tank. I was flabberghasted. Idled soooooo smooth too. Also hit 173 on a back road so in a vette it woulda been wicked.
P.S. I at this moment have almost no cooling problems with my motor except for one incident last year while stuck in bumper to bumper traffic on the Garden State for almost 30 minutes inching along on a 98 degree day. Water Temp crept upwards of 230 and made me quite nervous but as aoon as I got moving above 30 mph it dropped back down to about 190.
My cooling system is all stock except reduction pulleys. Not too bad considering its 22 years old.
Last edited by Gold1986Vette420; Feb 8, 2008 at 11:15 PM.