C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

400 chevy block in C4?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 16, 2007 | 10:05 AM
  #41  
chriswtx's Avatar
chriswtx
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,970
Likes: 20
From: San Marcos Texas
Default

Originally Posted by hooblyboobly
I never knew one could run a 400 without using steam holes. And that's with no gasket problems, nonetheless overheating?
I'm in south Texas, new stock radiator and no problems..Never seen over 230 degs and that was short time...My average temps are 185-210degs...Motor was built 3 years ago, so far so good...Going to the drag strip today to rip it up
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2007 | 12:58 PM
  #42  
CFI-EFI's Avatar
CFI-EFI
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,298
Likes: 33
From: The Top of Utah
Default

Originally Posted by chriswtx
I have a forged crank, 350 mains with the 400 stroke. No bearing spacers required..
Otherwise known as a 383 crankshaft. But you don't have a Chevrolet production block. I have a BowTie block like yours.

RACE ON!!!
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2007 | 01:25 PM
  #43  
CFI-EFI's Avatar
CFI-EFI
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,298
Likes: 33
From: The Top of Utah
Default

Originally Posted by hooblyboobly
I never knew one could run a 400 without using steam holes.
Who would have guessed? The 400 in my truck has had heads without steam holes for the last 15 to 20 years. It has never run hot.

RACE ON!!!
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2007 | 02:41 PM
  #44  
hexane's Avatar
hexane
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 2
From: Kathleen FL
Default

Originally Posted by CFI-EFI
Who would have guessed? The 400 in my truck has had heads without steam holes for the last 15 to 20 years. It has never run hot.

RACE ON!!!
So why did GM decide steam holes were necessary on 1970-1980 400s then, if they truly weren't needed? Are you saying you could use just a regular SBC head gasket vs. a head gasket required specifically for 400s? Inquiring minds want to know...
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2007 | 02:44 PM
  #45  
Pete K's Avatar
Pete K
Race Director
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,518
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by hooblyboobly
So why did GM decide steam holes were necessary on 1970-1980 400s then, if they truly weren't needed? Are you saying you could use just a regular SBC head gasket vs. a head gasket required specifically for 400s? Inquiring minds want to know...
400's have a 4.125 bore, so the standard sbc gasket will not work for that reason.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2007 | 02:57 PM
  #46  
danno85's Avatar
danno85
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 2
From: Austin TX
Default

Originally Posted by hooblyboobly
So why did GM decide steam holes were necessary on 1970-1980 400s then, if they truly weren't needed? Are you saying you could use just a regular SBC head gasket vs. a head gasket required specifically for 400s? Inquiring minds want to know...
The 400 SBC was the first production block with siamesed cylinders, and the engineers at the time "thought" that air would get trapped in those areas and therefore needed a place to escape, thus the steam holes (and it would be a "water" passage, not a "steam" passage). That has proven either not to be the case, or not a problem if that in fact does occurr. GM has since built siamesed cylinder blocks w/o steam holes, as has the aftermarket.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2007 | 05:32 PM
  #47  
chriswtx's Avatar
chriswtx
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,970
Likes: 20
From: San Marcos Texas
Default

I have a forged crank, 350 mains with the 400 stroke. No bearing spacers required..

Originally Posted by CFI-EFI
Otherwise known as a 383 crankshaft. But you don't have a Chevrolet production block. I have a BowTie block like yours.

RACE ON!!!
Opps I wrote that backwards. I have 400 mains with a 350 srtoke..I have a 1970's 2 bolt 400 block that I added splayed 4 bolt main caps to....

Last edited by chriswtx; Sep 16, 2007 at 05:34 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2007 | 06:22 PM
  #48  
CFI-EFI's Avatar
CFI-EFI
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,298
Likes: 33
From: The Top of Utah
Default

Originally Posted by hooblyboobly
So why did GM decide steam holes were necessary on 1970-1980 400s then, if they truly weren't needed?
Do you really expect me to explain the motivation for the actions of others??? Maybe I should cite why you've posted to this thread.



Originally Posted by hooblyboobly
Are you saying you could use just a regular SBC head gasket vs. a head gasket required specifically for 400s? Inquiring minds want to know...
I don't think I said that. If you think I did, please quote where. First maybe you should define "a regular SBC". Is a 305 "a regular SBC"? Is a 350 "a regular SBC". Do 305 and 350 head gaskets interchange? What, exactly, are you accusing me of having said??? hooblyboobly!

RACE ON!!!
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 11:11 AM
  #49  
scottbeef's Avatar
scottbeef
Intermediate
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Default

Eveyone should take a breath... Whew this isn't politics. The best part of this forum is people like all of you. I have learned a lot reading your wealth of knowledge. And not having to wade through all the egos. There is often more than one correct answer.

can't we all just get along?

Sorry I couldn't resist that one.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 12:48 PM
  #50  
Deakins's Avatar
Deakins
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 993
Likes: 3
From: Iowa
Default

For more of a hot rod type of car that doesn't get used much except for playing around I wouldn't build anything under a 400. My current power plant is a 355 and even with fully ported Brodix heads all my friends still love the old 406 it replaced better for seat of the pants feeling....
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 01:12 PM
  #51  
JLeatherman's Avatar
JLeatherman
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 3
From: MD
Default

I made a major mistake in my build (actually it was the builder, but I share the blame). He built me a 383 with an externally-balanced rotating assembly. This gave me the WORST of both worlds. PITA rotating assembly, but not the 406 cubic inches to make up for it. Anyway, it's in my car, running, without modifying the corssmember or anything. I picked up a forged, 153 tooth, externally balanced flywheel from a place in LA for $100 (they said they sell a lot of 'em to people who do this by accident). I also got a 6.75" externally balanced balancer from the same place for $60. I'm running a stock LT1 small starter, and everything nestled quite nicely into my engine bay.

When I get tired of the 383 I may build a 406+ for the car and slap the same flywheel/balancer on that...
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 01:15 PM
  #52  
JLeatherman's Avatar
JLeatherman
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 3
From: MD
Default

Oh yeah, lessons learned the hard way:

1.) A stock 400 flywheel DOES NOT FIT

2.) A 4+3 bellhousing CAN NOT BE CLEARANCED for a 400 flywheel

3.) A small internally balanced balancer CAN NOT BE BALANCED to a 400 crank

I think that's most of my personal issues on this one.

As for the 400 thing, a guy on the crossfire forum named Tom slapped a ported CFI intake on a bone-stock junkyard 400 and it ran fantastically well. Stock ECM, stock 400 engine, mildly ported CFI intake. Cubic inches are great...
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 08:32 PM
  #53  
redrose's Avatar
redrose
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,753
Likes: 15
From: backwoods upstate ny
Default

before you get it in and all screwed together, check that your 400 block is not missing one starter mounting tapping for the 153 wheel, many are only tapped for the two ''big wheel'' starter bolts, not three tapped holes for universal 153/168t fit.

with an lt1 intake conversion, you can ''space out'' the motor mounts enuf to clear the 400 front balancer over the vette crossmember...my 409 (400+.o40) only needed abt 1/4'' rise...tPi would probly hit the hood.

a 30 lb nodular iron 153t flywheel, neutral balanced for a 350 2-pc, can easily be rebalanced to 400 external balance and lightened additionally...some are bolting weights to the 350/L88 15lb wheel to get 400 balance but i like having two feet -no thanks.

GM power book sez steam holes are not req'd for operation over 3000 rpm, but lower speed use should have steam holes.

Last edited by redrose; Feb 7, 2008 at 08:38 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 09:50 PM
  #54  
LD85's Avatar
LD85
Race Director
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 12,772
Likes: 17
From: Indianapolis IN
Default

Originally Posted by JLeatherman
Oh yeah, lessons learned the hard way:


3.) A small internally balanced balancer CAN NOT BE BALANCED to a 400 crank
Not a big deal but you can nuetral balance the front of the crank with MALLORY METAL and use a stock 350 internal balance damper, with an exernal balance rear
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 04:49 PM
  #55  
cmcbunch's Avatar
cmcbunch
Instructor
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 163
Likes: 1
From: Idianapolis Indiana
Default

I was running an int balance 10.5:1 roller 383 with 215cc Iron eagles and a wide LSA camshaft with a tpi off an 86 vette. The only mods were a 58 mm throttle body, 30pph injectors, MSD 6A,a hot chip and an adj fuel press regulator. We advanced the cam 6 degrees and buddy the thottle response and torque was EXPLOSIVE. It did run out at 4000 rpm tho. But it didnt matter, I couldnt hook it up in an automatic/2.73 setup. If i had a locker, gears, and a torque converter man It woulda been fast. In my 92 camaro I was able to get 495 miles out of a tank. I was flabberghasted. Idled soooooo smooth too. Also hit 173 on a back road so in a vette it woulda been wicked.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 10:35 PM
  #56  
Gold1986Vette420's Avatar
Gold1986Vette420
Racer
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: Marlboro NY
Default

Why not stroke a 400 block???????

Check my avatar.


P.S. I at this moment have almost no cooling problems with my motor except for one incident last year while stuck in bumper to bumper traffic on the Garden State for almost 30 minutes inching along on a 98 degree day. Water Temp crept upwards of 230 and made me quite nervous but as aoon as I got moving above 30 mph it dropped back down to about 190.
My cooling system is all stock except reduction pulleys. Not too bad considering its 22 years old.

Last edited by Gold1986Vette420; Feb 8, 2008 at 11:15 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 11:21 PM
  #57  
AKS Racing's Avatar
AKS Racing
Safety Car
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,525
Likes: 2
From: Houston TX
Default

Why not bore / stroke the L98 to the same 408 cubes or 421 CID? Simple enough and none of these external balance issues.
Aaron
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:09 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE