Mega-ported SLP vs. SuperRam





stock runner length is 11.25"
stock manifold has 8" runners, total = 25.25 (with heads).
Accel runner length is also 8".
SuperRam runners are listed as 7", total = 21" (with heads).
Accel runner @ 8" with
SLP runners mega-ported (removing about 3" of 11" length) = 8"
The total runner length for the last option is about 22". And, the cross section is nearly as large as the SuperRam.
My question is would the mega-ported SLP setup (as shown on CorvettePlenum.com) perform about the same as a SuperRam?
From my perspective, it should be close because the increase in cross-sectional area is about the same and the decrease in runner-length is about the same.
I would expect a slightly lower torque number with much better top end.
Agree or not?
gp
You should check out the FIRST intake manifold. There is a group purchase being organized, much better value then the Super Ram or a set of SLP runners w/ a high flow base.
Randy
I just can't see getting rid of low end torque just to gain some more HP at the extreme RPM range, especially when most of us here run stop light to stop light. Would porting the plenum and going with the mega-ported SLP runners really be a noticeable difference down low or would the fact that you just keep the car in the higher RPM range make up the difference? In other words, you get into the high RPM really quickly anyways, so would there really be all that noticeable of a difference? Is it worth the low end loss to gain the high end HP?
You know--for what it cost to put this together, I am not too sure the used procharger wouldn't be the best option. I have seen two in the last 5 months for for less than $2000.00. Bolt it on, tune and be done with it. Plus you would still have the stock engine with reliability. I don't think you could hardly beat it.----oh yeah--no power loss down low!!!
Last edited by Bensons86; Nov 25, 2007 at 12:20 AM.

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I like the long tube setup as well, it looks like a lot can be done with the runners and base in terms of opening up extra flow and power without losing the low end grunt. My question is how much is actually lost in the runners versus the base. When does it become necessary to siamese/port the runners?
stock runner length is 11.25"
stock manifold has 8" runners, total = 25.25 (with heads).
Accel runner length is also 8".
SuperRam runners are listed as 7", total = 21" (with heads).
Accel runner @ 8" with
SLP runners mega-ported (removing about 3" of 11" length) = 8"
The total runner length for the last option is about 22". And,
the cross section is nearly as large as the SuperRam.
The information at StealthRam comes from posts made by grumpyvette.
He made contributions here and elsewhere like the following ones from
2003 - long before StealthRam.com came into existence.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show...post1544717024
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show...post1544568309
I'm not sure how grumpyvette measured his LPE/Accel base and
runners but I can say with certainty that if the length is
measured roughly along the center of the port diameter, the
numbers are shorter than those shown at StealthRam.
Actual SuperRam Runner lengths
5.5": Runner
6.0": Head
Interestingly, the number above of 6.5" is close to the 6.125" value
listed for the Accel base near the top of grumpyvette's intake
dimension comparison. However, for some reason the numbers at
the bottom of the comparison list the Accel base at 8.0" - this is
simply wrong.
The intake comparison was ambitious and novel. I think that much
of the information and discussion is valuable. Unfortunately the
SR data shown does not reflect lengths of the actual parts.
.


Full article here:
http://www.compcams.com/Community/Ar...?ID=1737510521





This seems no less productive than putting headers on a car and the price is similar.
Gregg




















