C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

ACCELERATION: Vette vs Jet Aircraft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 09:01 PM
  #21  
Pete K's Avatar
Pete K
Race Director
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,518
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by Aurora40
Search the archives, there are some pictures of a 415ci ZR-1 racing I believe an F-15? If I recall, the jet red-lighted.

As far as sitting in a passenger airplane, who knows how fast it is going? Maybe bring a GPS receiver or something with you next time?
I did that yesterday. A 757 leaves the runway at 200 mph and cruised at 610 mph. I will bring a stopwatch with me next time and check the 0-60
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 09:46 PM
  #22  
Carpenter's Avatar
Carpenter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver B.C.
Default

Originally Posted by RandyJ75
This is the coolest post I have ever read on this, or any forum.

Nice Job
I've stolen it from a very cool guy on my local vette forum.

Old Dec 22, 2007 | 10:05 AM
  #23  
corvette-pilot's Avatar
corvette-pilot
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,991
Likes: 2
From: Hanger 18 Taxachusetts
Default

Originally Posted by Pete K
I did that yesterday. A 757 leaves the runway at 200 mph and cruised at 610 mph. I will bring a stopwatch with me next time and check the 0-60
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question...ce/q0088.shtml
737 @ 150MPH
757 @ 160MPH

Plus an airliner needs more runway than a fighter jet to get to that speed I would think a Vette would have some chance. It's a 1 mile drag race to 150MPH? I bet the Vette blows it away off the line but the jet obviously will accelerate much longer and faster so it should catch up.
Old Dec 22, 2007 | 10:27 AM
  #24  
Pete K's Avatar
Pete K
Race Director
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,518
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by corvette-pilot
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question...ce/q0088.shtml
737 @ 150MPH
757 @ 160MPH

Plus an airliner needs more runway than a fighter jet to get to that speed I would think a Vette would have some chance. It's a 1 mile drag race to 150MPH? I bet the Vette blows it away off the line but the jet obviously will accelerate much longer and faster so it should catch up.
My pilot must have been having a little fun I was a bit suprised to see 200 mph as the wheels lifted. The last 2 737's were right at 150 ish.
Edit:
It was an airbus A340. I just checked my ticket.
Old Dec 22, 2007 | 11:32 AM
  #25  
Allentown Ernie's Avatar
Allentown Ernie
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 794
Likes: 2
From: Allentown Pa.
Default Bugati-Eruo-Fighter Video!!!

This is the coolest race video ever. It blows the doors of any other race video I have ever seen. Allentown Ernie.
Old Dec 22, 2007 | 01:16 PM
  #26  
Grease Monkey's Avatar
Grease Monkey
Team Owner
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 26,598
Likes: 0
From: Hampton, VA Yea, i'm a redneck... but you love it
Cruise-In 8-9 Veteran
aka/Trunk Monkey/Banned For Life/Corvette For Life
Default

Originally Posted by Carpenter
* One Top Fuel dragster 500 cubic-inch Hemi engine
makes more horsepower (8,000 HP) than the first 4 rows of cars at the Daytona 500.

* Under full throttle, a dragster engine consumes
11.2 gallons of nitro methane per second; a fully loaded 747
consumes jet fuel at the same rate with 25% less energy being produced.

* A stock Dodge Hemi V8 engine cannot produce
enough power to merely drive the dragster's supercharger.

* With 3000 CFM of air being rammed in by the
supercharger on overdrive, the fuel mixture is compressed into a
near-solid form before ignition. Cylinders run on the verge of hydraulic
lock at full throttle.

* At the stoichiometric 1.7:1 air/fuel mixture for
nitro methane the flame front temperature measures 7050 degrees F.

* Nitro methane burns yellow. The spectacular
white flame seen above the stacks at night is raw burning hydrogen,
dissociated from atmospheric water vapor by the searing exhaust
gases.

* Dual magnetos supply 44 amps to each spark plug.
This is the output of an arc welder in each cylinder.

* Spark plug electrodes are totally consumed
during a pass. After 1/2 way, the engine is dieseling from compression plus
the glow of exhaust valves at 1400 degrees F. The engine can only be
shut down by cutting the fuel flow.

* If spark momentarily fails early in the run,
unburned nitro builds up in the affected cylinders and then explodes with
sufficient force to blow cylinder heads off the block in pieces or split
the block in half.

* Dragsters reach over 300 MPH before you have
completed reading this sentence.

* In order to exceed 300 MPH in 4.5 seconds,
dragsters must accelerate an average of over 4 G's. In order to reach 200 MPH
well before half-track, the launch acceleration approaches 8
G's.

* Top Fuel engines turn approximately 540
revolutions from ! light to light!

* Including the burnout, the engine must only
survive 900 revolutions under load.

* The redline is actually quite high at 9500 RPM.

* THE BOTTOM LINE: Assuming all the equipment is
paid off, the crew worked for free, & for once, NOTHING BLOWS UP, each
run costs an estimated $1,000 per second.

0 to 100 MPH in .8 seconds (the first 60 feet of the run)
0 to 200 MPH in 2.2 seconds (the first 350 feet of the run)
6 g-forces at the starting line (nothing accelerates faster on land)
6 negative g-forces upon deployment of twin ‘chutes at 300 MPH
An NHRA Top Fuel Dragster accelerates quicker than any other land vehicle on earth quicker than a jet fighter plane . . . quicker than the space shuttle.

The current Top Fuel dragster elapsed time record is
4.420 seconds for the quarter-mile (2004, Doug Kalitta). The
top speed record is 337.58 MPH as measured over the last 66'
of the run (2005, Tony Schumacher).

Putting this all into perspective:

You are driving the average $140,000 Lingenfelter
twin-turbo powered Corvette Z06. Over a mile up the road, a Top Fuel
dragster is staged & ready to launch down a quarter-mile strip as you
pass. You have the advantage of a flying start. You run the 'Vette
hard up through the gears and blast across the starting line & pass the
dragster at an honest 200 MPH. The 'tree' goes green for both of
you at that moment.

The dragster launches & starts after you. You keep
your foot down hard, but you hear an incredibly brutal whine that sears
your eardrums & within 3 seconds the dragster catches & passes you.
He beats you to the finish line, a quarter-mile away from where you just
passed him. Think about it - from a standing start, the dragster had
spotted you 200 MPH & not only caught, but nearly blasted you off the road
when he passed you within a mere 1320 foot long race!

That's acceleration !
After reading this I think it moved
Old Dec 22, 2007 | 07:29 PM
  #27  
C4DC's Avatar
C4DC
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,080
Likes: 3
From: Clearwater FL
St. Jude Donor '06
Default

The passenger jets will not accelerate like a fighter and our cars are no match for the Bugatti. The question remains: How long before a Vette would be blown off the runway. Those passenger jets seem to accelerate harder as they go faster too. I don't think they hammer the throttles to full right from the start. I'd bet it is somewhere arounr 80-100mph.
Old Dec 23, 2007 | 11:43 AM
  #28  
The Beep's Avatar
The Beep
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
From: Houston TX
Default

Originally Posted by C4DC
The passenger jets will not accelerate like a fighter and our cars are no match for the Bugatti. The question remains: How long before a Vette would be blown off the runway. Those passenger jets seem to accelerate harder as they go faster too. I don't think they hammer the throttles to full right from the start. I'd bet it is somewhere arounr 80-100mph.
Agreed, the pilots often throttle up incrementally. My guess is from a standing start against a 757, a stock LT1 looses at around 100 mph. But that really is guessing.
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

5 Best & 5 Most Overrated Corvette Track Packages of All Time!

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Every 2027 Corvette Engine Explained

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-7

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Dec 23, 2007 | 01:37 PM
  #29  
devildog's Avatar
devildog
Burning Brakes
Supporting Lifetime
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 1
From: fighter pilots make movies, bomber pilots make history
Default

Originally Posted by The Beep
Been boarding a lot of planes lately and noticing some impressive acceleration. I was wondering if the C4 was about the same. Maybe from 30-100 mph they may compare? Certainly after that, the jets friggin gone.

Any seat-of-the-pants thoughts or stats on this?
No seat-of-the pants guessing, I have detailed performance charts on both Corvettes and Boeings. A stock LT-1 will easily take a 737 in a 1/4 mile.
Old Dec 25, 2007 | 07:10 PM
  #30  
bdw18_123's Avatar
bdw18_123
Drifting
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 2
From: Prather, California -1990 ZR-1 White/Flame Red- -SOLD!!-
Default

Demonic85, that video you posted was f'ing awesome man!!! I got an adrenalin rush just watching that, imagine being in that jet pullin a 90 and goin straight up, I bet nothing comes close.
Old Dec 26, 2007 | 03:48 AM
  #31  
Irishpilot03's Avatar
Irishpilot03
Racer
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: Sumter South Carolina
Default

I fly the F-16 and drive a Corvette, so I hope some of my experience helps answer this question. First, jets (fighters and heavies alike) are not created for acceleration on land. So this comparison is pretty much like comparing apples to oranges. However, there is a race that happens every year at the Luke Air Force Base air show called Viper versus Viper. The first race is a clean F-16 (ie no bombs, missiles or external tanks --all which add drag and weight) against a stock new Dodge Viper. The F-16 is not allowed to use afterburner and it is usually a close race with the Dodge just edging out the F-16. The next race is the F-16, with afterburner, against a race-ready 600hp Viper. This one usually ends up with the Dodge again just beating the F-16. However, when the F-16 becomes airborne and gear in the well, it proceeds to go verticle.

The principles of acceleration with a jet engine is, the faster you go, the faster you accelerate. Jet engines love to have plenty of air down the intake, which is the suck-bang-blow (get your mind out of the gutter) idea. So, an F-16 from a dead stop has to overcome the inertia of a 26,000lb jet with 28,000lbs of thrust (full AB), plus it doesn't have the added benefit of air being forced down the intake at 400kts (around 460mph at sea level). Even with that amount of thrust, it takes a few seconds for the jet to really start to pick up. This is where the car (insert Corvette) will get a decent jump on the jet. However, a clean F-16 is going to quickly pass a stock corvette (all street production models). Usually on a normal day, with full AB in a clean jet I'm off the ground in about 1500ft at 150-ish kts and by the time I'm at the end of the runway (10,000ft) I'm doing 400+kts.

The seat of the pants push of the F-16 is a lot more than the Corvette, but for head-snapping forces off the line, the Corvette wins hands down. The F-16 has a constant push in the seat and keeps you there.

So, both are different and exciting and that's why I love driving my Corvette and flying the F-16!
Old Jul 24, 2009 | 09:15 AM
  #32  
The Beep's Avatar
The Beep
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
From: Houston TX
Default

Originally Posted by Carpenter
* One Top Fuel dragster 500 cubic-inch Hemi engine
makes more horsepower (8,000 HP) than the first 4 rows of cars at the Daytona 500.

* Under full throttle, a dragster engine consumes
11.2 gallons of nitro methane per second; a fully loaded 747
consumes jet fuel at the same rate with 25% less energy being produced.

* A stock Dodge Hemi V8 engine cannot produce
enough power to merely drive the dragster's supercharger.

* With 3000 CFM of air being rammed in by the
supercharger on overdrive, the fuel mixture is compressed into a
near-solid form before ignition. Cylinders run on the verge of hydraulic
lock at full throttle.

* At the stoichiometric 1.7:1 air/fuel mixture for
nitro methane the flame front temperature measures 7050 degrees F.

* Nitro methane burns yellow. The spectacular
white flame seen above the stacks at night is raw burning hydrogen,
dissociated from atmospheric water vapor by the searing exhaust
gases.

* Dual magnetos supply 44 amps to each spark plug.
This is the output of an arc welder in each cylinder.

* Spark plug electrodes are totally consumed
during a pass. After 1/2 way, the engine is dieseling from compression plus
the glow of exhaust valves at 1400 degrees F. The engine can only be
shut down by cutting the fuel flow.

* If spark momentarily fails early in the run,
unburned nitro builds up in the affected cylinders and then explodes with
sufficient force to blow cylinder heads off the block in pieces or split
the block in half.

* Dragsters reach over 300 MPH before you have
completed reading this sentence.

* In order to exceed 300 MPH in 4.5 seconds,
dragsters must accelerate an average of over 4 G's. In order to reach 200 MPH
well before half-track, the launch acceleration approaches 8
G's.

* Top Fuel engines turn approximately 540
revolutions from ! light to light!

* Including the burnout, the engine must only
survive 900 revolutions under load.

* The redline is actually quite high at 9500 RPM.

* THE BOTTOM LINE: Assuming all the equipment is
paid off, the crew worked for free, & for once, NOTHING BLOWS UP, each
run costs an estimated $1,000 per second.

0 to 100 MPH in .8 seconds (the first 60 feet of the run)
0 to 200 MPH in 2.2 seconds (the first 350 feet of the run)
6 g-forces at the starting line (nothing accelerates faster on land)
6 negative g-forces upon deployment of twin ‘chutes at 300 MPH
An NHRA Top Fuel Dragster accelerates quicker than any other land vehicle on earth quicker than a jet fighter plane . . . quicker than the space shuttle.

The current Top Fuel dragster elapsed time record is
4.420 seconds for the quarter-mile (2004, Doug Kalitta). The
top speed record is 337.58 MPH as measured over the last 66'
of the run (2005, Tony Schumacher).

Putting this all into perspective:

You are driving the average $140,000 Lingenfelter
twin-turbo powered Corvette Z06. Over a mile up the road, a Top Fuel
dragster is staged & ready to launch down a quarter-mile strip as you
pass. You have the advantage of a flying start. You run the 'Vette
hard up through the gears and blast across the starting line & pass the
dragster at an honest 200 MPH. The 'tree' goes green for both of
you at that moment.

The dragster launches & starts after you. You keep
your foot down hard, but you hear an incredibly brutal whine that sears
your eardrums & within 3 seconds the dragster catches & passes you.
He beats you to the finish line, a quarter-mile away from where you just
passed him. Think about it - from a standing start, the dragster had
spotted you 200 MPH & not only caught, but nearly blasted you off the road
when he passed you within a mere 1320 foot long race!

That's acceleration !
Sorry, I just love the stats in this particular post.
Old Jul 24, 2009 | 10:47 AM
  #33  
94z07fx3's Avatar
94z07fx3
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,383
Likes: 4
Default

I remember an old magazine "XL" in the '80s. They tested the 1984 Corvette when it came out by pitting it against a T-38 (F-5 sans fangs). They got Chuck Yeager to fly the plane and drive the car. The L83 powered C4 easily won the 1/4 mile.
Old Jul 24, 2009 | 12:05 PM
  #34  
JrRifleCoach's Avatar
JrRifleCoach
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
St. Jude 20 Year Donor
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 20,179
Likes: 673
From: Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.
St. Jude '03 thru '24
Default

Originally Posted by BlueBomber
Demonic 85, that was the coolest video....ever.
Video cnacelled
Old Jul 24, 2009 | 01:31 PM
  #35  
MK 82's Avatar
MK 82
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,286
Likes: 6
From: Palm Beach
Default

Doh! I love the authorities on everything.

Originally Posted by Demonic85
I forgot to ask what kind of jet? If its a big like a 747, then the vette would actually stand a chance for a few seconds but the jet would start pulling ahead quick.
Old Jul 24, 2009 | 01:34 PM
  #36  
MK 82's Avatar
MK 82
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,286
Likes: 6
From: Palm Beach
Default

Originally Posted by The Beep
Agreed, the pilots often throttle up incrementally. really is guessing.
Where in the cornbread hell did you get that?

20 year airline Captain.
Old Jul 24, 2009 | 01:49 PM
  #37  
AirBusPilot's Avatar
AirBusPilot
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,578
Likes: 61
From: Austin TX
Default

I fly the Airbus 319/320/321 series currently.

Most take offs are at a reduced power setting (saves engine wear and fuel). And, on average, they are well loaded.

In that configuration, most stock (base) vettes would easily pull to about a 100 mph, after that the tables would begin to turn.

I have flown ferry flights too, these are the funnest as there are no passengers and cargo, and the plane is some 50,000 lbs lighter. A TOGA (full power) take off in this configuration is much faster. In this configuration, I'd probably match the acceleration of a low 13 second 1/4 vette at about 90 mph, and surpass it soon thereafter.

A big handicap of the type of planes I fly is that it can take as long as 8 or 9 seconds to get the engines spooled up before they can make serious thrust. The bottom line is that passenger jets dont' really start accelerating hard until past a 100 mph or so.

Get notified of new replies

To ACCELERATION: Vette vs Jet Aircraft

Old Jul 24, 2009 | 02:02 PM
  #38  
MK 82's Avatar
MK 82
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,286
Likes: 6
From: Palm Beach
Default

You are correct in that most takeoffs are made at less than full thrust. However that power setting is made all at once, not incrementally.

I know that you know that but your post will confuse some of our jet power experts.



Originally Posted by AirBusPilot
I fly the Airbus 319/320/321 series currently.

Most take offs are at a reduced power setting (saves engine wear and fuel). And, on average, they are well loaded.

In that configuration, most stock (base) vettes would easily pull to about a 100 mph, after that the tables would begin to turn.

I have flown ferry flights too, these are the funnest as there are no passengers and cargo, and the plane is some 50,000 lbs lighter. A TOGA (full power) take off in this configuration is much faster. In this configuration, I'd probably match the acceleration of a low 13 second 1/4 vette at about 90 mph, and surpass it soon thereafter.

A big handicap of the type of planes I fly is that it can take as long as 8 or 9 seconds to get the engines spooled up before they can make serious thrust. The bottom line is that passenger jets dont' really start accelerating hard until past a 100 mph or so.
Old Jul 24, 2009 | 02:05 PM
  #39  
AirBusPilot's Avatar
AirBusPilot
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,578
Likes: 61
From: Austin TX
Default

Originally Posted by MK 82
You are correct in that most takeoffs are made at less than full thrust. However that power setting is made all at once, not incrementally.

I know that you know that but your post will confuse some of our jet power experts.
We don't slam the throttles open, we bring them to 1.05 epr first (takes a few seconds), then we set them at either "FLEX" (reduced) detent, or TOGA detent. The FADEC's control them at that point.
Old Jul 24, 2009 | 02:07 PM
  #40  
MK 82's Avatar
MK 82
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,286
Likes: 6
From: Palm Beach
Default

Originally Posted by JrRifleCoach
Video cnacelled
The video was from Top Gear on BBCA. The jet won.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:26 PM.

story-0
5 Best & 5 Most Overrated Corvette Track Packages of All Time!

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 most overrated Corvette track packages ever.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 12:46:45


VIEW MORE
story-1
Every 2027 Corvette Engine Explained

Slideshow: Every 2027 Corvette engine explained

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 12:16:31


VIEW MORE
story-2
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette

Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-08 19:53:43


VIEW MORE
story-3
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-6
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-8
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-9
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE