Synthetic vs Regular Oil

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
FYI: I recently changed over to synthetic in my Toyota because certain models using regular oil are prone to sludge. Toyota Corollas and Siennas are a few of the most prone to sludging because most newer Toyotas run hot from the factory, eventually clogging the oil ports in the motor. Also there are some negligent people in this world that think cars only need gasoline and ignore maintenance so that is part of the problem right there. So pretty much, that is how I bought into the idea of why the benefits of synthetic oil outweigh regular oil by far. Sure regular oil is good for seating in the rings of new motors, but that's a different story all together...

However, you say to run synthetic oil in ALL roller cam engines and that is just wrong. You can run any oil that meets the specs for that year. If someone wants to pay 2 or 3 times as much for synthetic...fine. It's just that they don't need to.
My 1989 ran dino 10w-30 dino for 18 years and has had ZERO engine issues. No way would I switch it to Mobil 1 or any other synthetic.
IIRC GM didn't start using Mobil 1 until the LT1, and I think that decision had to do with higher operating temperatures in the LT1.
L98 cars with roller cams will do great on Dino and so will LT1/LT4 cars. That is why you must stay in the first grade......sorry.
Last edited by BADDUCK; Feb 18, 2008 at 08:57 AM. Reason: Spelling

GM also brought back some of the "EOS" for the flat tappet guys, stock up on it while you can.

Mostly because this has been an entertaining thread and appears to be quite the emotional issue on oh so many levels, I'd like to throw in some anectdotal water muddying.
The following aren't opinions; I'm just laying out the facts here, infer from them what you will:
1. I sold my '94 9C1 cop Caprice (LT1) in 2006. It had the original engine and 177,000 miles on it. The engine ran strong, used no oil, and was in all ways fine. I drove it hard, with full Darwinian intent (survival of the fittest or it doesn't belong in my garage). Non-synthetic oil.
2. I run synthetic in my '95 LT1 Vette (166K miles).
Last edited by El T1; Feb 18, 2008 at 10:29 AM.
sure syn is recommended -- and so big whup, it sure ain't required.
i'll keep my change in my pocket, thank you very much.
how's that for kindergarten 101? there is a point to it though.
Last edited by Red Tornado; Feb 18, 2008 at 04:10 PM.
No harm, no foul. I love these oil threads.
My opinion, synthetic provide enough benefits that they are worth a few extra dollars a quart (and contrary to the poster above, AMSOIL isn't that expensive, their XL line is less than $5 per quart for Preferred Customer program members - see info in my sig).
Here are some of the benefits of synthetic:
These favorable properties include:
A wide operational temperature range.
Good viscometrics (high viscosity index).
Thermal Stability.
Oxidative Stability.
Hydrolytic stability.
Shear stability.
Low corrosivity.
Compatibility with mineral oils.
Compatibility with various materials of construction.
Low toxicity.
Manufacturing flexibility that allows tailoring products to specific end-use application requirements.
If you are really interested, take a look at the data in this AMSOIL commissioned test. Feel free to through out the AMSOIL results if you feel that they are biased, but draw your own conclusions on the results of the other synthetic and non-synthetic oils in the test.
Comparative Motor Oil Test Nov 05


C66 Racing #66 NASA ST2, SCCA T2
AMSOIL Dealer (Forum Vendor)
AMSOIL Preferred Customer Program (Members buy at Wholesale - a savings of about 25%)

















