When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
ok i am about to install my hooker long tube headers. im not worried abuot any visual or emissions testing so i am eliminating the cats. i will also be cutting out the stock resinator and running an x-pipe in its place. other mods include custom ECM, GM Hotcam, stage two clutch, 52MM throttle body, and the never go wrong K&N air filter. With my current mods i am at an estimated 340-350 WHP.
So my question is this, what size piping should i run? my plan was to go with 2.75" piping and a 3" X-pipe (seeing as how they do not make a 2.75 X-pipe that i can find) what i am afraid of is since im eliminating the cats and will have nothing but the X-pipe and mufflers to create back presure that a 2.75" system might be to big therfor causing me to loose torque. but at the same time 2.5" seems like it would be tosmall from my personal expieriance with other vehicles.
Please all personal expieriance and knowledge on this matter would be greatly appreciated.
ok i am about to install my hooker long tube headers. im not worried abuot any visual or emissions testing so i am eliminating the cats. i will also be cutting out the stock resinator and running an x-pipe in its place. other mods include custom ECM, GM Hotcam, stage two clutch, 52MM throttle body, and the never go wrong K&N air filter. With my current mods i am at an estimated 340-350 WHP.
So my question is this, what size piping should i run? my plan was to go with 2.75" piping and a 3" X-pipe (seeing as how they do not make a 2.75 X-pipe that i can find) what i am afraid of is since im eliminating the cats and will have nothing but the X-pipe and mufflers to create back presure that a 2.75" system might be to big therfor causing me to loose torque. but at the same time 2.5" seems like it would be tosmall from my personal expieriance with other vehicles.
Please all personal expieriance and knowledge on this matter would be greatly appreciated.
I would be a little worried of running the 2 3/4 especially on a stock displacement motor. Father in law has a 69 camaro with a 427 bbc in it and when he changed from 2 3/4 to 3' he lost torque and it only made 15 more hp but it made it nearly 500 rpm higher. Too much pipe is overkill and can harm your power down low and mid range. I would try to stay with 2.5 if it were me. Im sure someone else will chime in and say the opposite just my .02
A few things you should know in helping you make your decision.
One: You need a minimum of 2.2cfm of exhaust capacity per motor horsepower for 1% or less back pressure.
Two: One square inch of exhaust pipe(o.d.) will move 115 cfm of exhaust.
A 2.50" pipe will move 560cfm.
A 2.75" pipe will move 682cfm.
A 3.00" pipe will move 812cfm.
A 3.50" pipe will move 1105cfm.
A 4.00" pipe will move 1444cfm.
A 400 horsepower motor will require 880 cfm.
A 450 horsepower motor will require 990 cfm.
A 500 horsepower motor will require 1100 cfm.
I had true dual (3" pipe) and X pipe with 2 3/4 Magnaflo LT1 mufflers pull on my car last thursday and pick up .3 and 3 mph but my car is a L98 and it had headers and a cat back with (flo)slowmaster mufflers
Randy
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.