When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
the problem is your carb. You can still stay with carb but go with a regular 650 cfm carb instead of the double pumper and you should see about 18-20 mpg.
weren't you the one going on about how great of gas mileage you could get with a carb and that efi is just a bunch of trouble and a waste of money to pursue cause of the high cost of parts?? funny how fast that went out the window.. i bet you the harness isn't as hard to replace as you think.. if you can change a heater core in 2 hours i think you may be able to change out the harness.
The mileage was great, until I got on it. I basically drove like an oldie to get 14 mpg which I can stand. I'm gonna consider a regular 650 and see how it does. The DP could be part of the problem. When those mechanical secondaries open up, mileage just decreases from there.
Those mechanical secondaries are a major factor in your poor mileage, coupled with driving style of course. Rodders used to like those spread bores as you called them, also called quadra pukes. But really, for those that really know the Quadrajet they are a good example of what fuel economy and performance can be had out of a carb.
Last edited by rick lambert; Apr 6, 2008 at 10:46 AM.
weren't you the one going on about how great of gas mileage you could get with a carb and that efi is just a bunch of trouble and a waste of money to pursue cause of the high cost of parts?? funny how fast that went out the window.. i bet you the harness isn't as hard to replace as you think.. if you can change a heater core in 2 hours i think you may be able to change out the harness.
Yep! That wiring harness has a plug at every connection. How tough can THAT be? It should be duck soup compared to a C4 heater core. You could probably do it on your lunch 1/2 hour.
Your best mileage of 14, that you seem to be OK with, would be about your worst with EFI.
the problem is your carb. You can still stay with carb but go with a regular 650 cfm carb instead of the double pumper and you should see about 18-20 mpg.
I went with the vacuum secondary myself as it was the one recommended for street use in vehicles over 3000 lbs if I remember correctly from the Holley website. I even went on the small side of the CFM recommendation for my motor and it seems fine.
Yep! That wiring harness has a plug at every connection. How tough can THAT be? It should be duck soup compared to a C4 heater core. You could probably do it on your lunch 1/2 hour.
Your best mileage of 14, that you seem to be OK with, would be about your worst with EFI.
RACE ON!!!
I would have to tap into it. Hopefully there would be less cuts and bruises to endure than when swapping heater cores.
Have you done any tuning of the accelerator pumps, power valves or even jetting?
You could try some later opening power valves (lower vacuum), less agressive pump cams, smaller shooter nozzels, etc.
If you can eliminate the overfueling, if that is the case, you should see some improvement. If the fueling is already spot-on, then there's not much you can do.
I wouldn't be surprised if you're running on the power valves much of the time.
Hate to rock the boat but how the hell are you gonna get 20mpg with a carbd/cammed stroker, no way. Even a 350 I would question that .
You can feel the secondaires in your gas pedal, tune the hell out of the car and stay in the primaries.
I would think it would be possible with tuning. I thought I had tuned the carb correctly, but I'm thinking crappy fuel economy from "spirited driving" is due to the DP, less the cam. I know I could probably figure out a way on how to make those secondaries open a little later. On a better note yesterday, the car dynoed at 445 rwhp @ 5800 and 477 tq @ 3600. Now that is C6 Z06 territory!
Have you done any tuning of the accelerator pumps, power valves or even jetting?
You could try some later opening power valves (lower vacuum), less agressive pump cams, smaller shooter nozzels, etc.
If you can eliminate the overfueling, if that is the case, you should see some improvement. If the fueling is already spot-on, then there's not much you can do.
I wouldn't be surprised if you're running on the power valves much of the time.
Yeah, I still have the 6.5 power valve which might be part of the issue even on part throttle. Jetting is still the factory 67 primary, 72 secondary. Fuel pressure is 5.5 psi which Holley recommends. On my WB, I see a WOT a/f of 12.5:1 which seems about perfect. Idling it will stay at about 13.2:1 Cruises are about 14:1 so that is ok also. Funny thing is when I get onto it, there is no noticeable black smoke coming out of the exhaust. Now when I free rev it into the secondaries, you can see some. When black smoke comes out of it on a free rev, the WB shows 11:1.