ZZ4 questions
I ordered a ZZ4 350 short block on Friday the 11th from Summit and it arrived today
The short block comes with pistons, rods and steel crank all assembled. You have to add cam, timing set, oil pump....etc. Most of what I have will transfer, but have ordered new parts as well. But you may not know that the ZZ4 is not balanced from GM
. So I am pulling it apart to have it balanced.That is the background, now the questions:
1) Since the ZZ4 is a new motor, can I use the old "standard torque values"?
a) connecting rod caps 45 pounds
b) main bearing caps 80 pounds
2) Is the retainer that holds the cam in at the front of the block torqued?
I am not too worried about the other things. I have torque values on the AFR heads and the SR. This will be a mild build, nothing radical. I will install the Lingfelter 74211 roller cam with 1.6 RR's. I have to change out the springs on the heads. My old 85 with the AFR heads and SR using the stock cam and pistons was at about 346 HP at the crank and 434 lbs of torque. I am guessing this new combination will be 375-400 HP and close to 500 pounds of torque. We will see what the numbers are when I have TJ Wong dyno and burn a new chip for this motor.
I ordered a ZZ4 350 short block on Friday the 11th from Summit and it arrived today
The short block comes with pistons, rods and steel crank all assembled. You have to add cam, timing set, oil pump....etc. Most of what I have will transfer, but have ordered new parts as well. But you may not know that the ZZ4 is not balanced from GM
. So I am pulling it apart to have it balanced.That is the background, now the questions:
1) Since the ZZ4 is a new motor, can I use the old "standard torque values"?
a) connecting rod caps 45 pounds
b) main bearing caps 80 pounds
2) Is the retainer that holds the cam in at the front of the block torqued?
I am not too worried about the other things. I have torque values on the AFR heads and the SR. This will be a mild build, nothing radical. I will install the Lingfelter 74211 roller cam with 1.6 RR's. I have to change out the springs on the heads. My old 85 with the AFR heads and SR using the stock cam and pistons was at about 346 HP at the crank and 434 lbs of torque. I am guessing this new combination will be 375-400 HP and close to 500 pounds of torque. We will see what the numbers are when I have TJ Wong dyno and burn a new chip for this motor.
Randy
I talked two Chev dealers in the area and asked specifically if the ZZ4 was balanced and was told it was not. Now don't get me wrong, GM does a minimal balance on the crank like you would with a set of tires. But they do not weigh the pistons and rods and remove weight as needed to insure that all weigh the same. Todays parts are much more accurate than they were 20 years ago. But a balanced engine will perform and not create vibrations to limit performance and longivity. The 350 crank has more room than the 400 crank to balance internally, which is why a 400 or a 383 which uses the 400 crank are balanced externally using the flexplate or flywheel and the balancer. My friend who will do the balancing for me is in the crank grinding business. They usually will balance a "external balance" set up like the 383 or 400 internally, it is harder to do but they feel it is better.
The last engine I built was 26 years ago from the bare block up. I had this balanced. It would wind up quickly to 5500 rpm before shifting. This was in a full sized Blazer 4x4 and lasted 23 years and about 300,000 miles many, many off road.
I talked two Chev dealers in the area and asked specifically if the ZZ4 was balanced and was told it was not. Now don't get me wrong, GM does a minimal balance on the crank like you would with a set of tires. But they do not weigh the pistons and rods and remove weight as needed to insure that all weigh the same. Todays parts are much more accurate than they were 20 years ago. But a balanced engine will perform and not create vibrations to limit performance and longivity. The 350 crank has more room than the 400 crank to balance internally, which is why a 400 or a 383 which uses the 400 crank are balanced externally using the flexplate or flywheel and the balancer. My friend who will do the balancing for me is in the crank grinding business. They usually will balance a "external balance" set up like the 383 or 400 internally, it is harder to do but they feel it is better.
The last engine I built was 26 years ago from the bare block up. I had this balanced. It would wind up quickly to 5500 rpm before shifting. This was in a full sized Blazer 4x4 and lasted 23 years and about 300,000 miles many, many off road.
Randy
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Absolutely - it's just a question of to what tolerance/spec. I think the ZZ4 longblock redlines at something like 53-5400 rpm a speed where the factory balance is more than fine. If you plan to spin 6k+ all the time, it would be worth getting a balance to within a gram and change. Your rods will thank you.
They are going to keep track of each piston and rod weight before and after balancing. I will post this information as it is processed to show what GM thinks as acceptable for their engines.




















