When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I just ran a scan on my 87' with a scan tool, the auto x-ray 6000. The scan displayed a problem with my EST, monitor error code and MAF / MAP sensor, too high and MAF sensor, burnoff fault. The scanner gave me these three codes. The problem is the car will not start, and if I do get it started it will not run for no longer than a few seconds before it shut off. The scanner is showing me my tps sensor is reading .68 volts. I have set this sensor several times at .54 but it continues read higher everytime I attempt to start the car. It's a brand new sensor, just installed it and its set properly. Another thing my injectors are reading 11.2 ms on a three second run, is this correct. I thought the injectors read only around 4.4 after start up. Thanks guys for your help in advance. This problem has been haunting me for almost four months.
The TPS will read .68Vdc at normal idle if it was set to .54Vdc at base idle of 450rpm.
Never, ever, seen that on my vette, and I can't see why I would. The only difference between min idle and normal idle, is the IAC will bypass air to reach target RPM. The throttle hasn't moved, nor has the TPS, so why would there be a change in TPS value ??
No Map on an 87, disregard that one. What am I missing here as far as your injectors.....11.2 ms? and 4.4? Your injectors should ohm above 10ohms, per 87 FSM. My 87 injectors (stock) ohmed around 16. Most important is that they all ohm within + or -.5. You should also do a fuel pressure test.
I'm with 86 on the TPS setting, maybe 65Z01 can fill us in?
Another thing, take your ignition control module to AutoZone, they'll test it for free.
The throttle hasn't moved, nor has the TPS, so why would there be a change in TPS value ??
I understand your logic and can only guess that the inflow of air at the normal idle is pulling the throttle blades open a tad. After I set my TPS to .65Vdc at min. idle of 450RPM I always see around .74Vdc at normal idle of ~700RPM.
I just checked an old AutoXray scan and see .78Vdc at 660rpm.
No Map on an 87, disregard that one. What am I missing here as far as your injectors.....11.2 ms? and 4.4? Your injectors should ohm above 10ohms, per 87 FSM. My 87 injectors (stock) ohmed around 16. Most important is that they all ohm within + or -.5. You should also do a fuel pressure test.
I'm with 86 on the TPS setting, maybe 65Z01 can fill us in?
Another thing, take your ignition control module to AutoZone, they'll test it for free.
MS (milliseconds is the time the coil is energized) Also called IPW (injector pulse width) if you run an engine at 1000 rpm with a IPW at 11.2, the IDC (injector duty cycle would be 9.33% on your engine. so that number of 11.2 is ok with me. This number is lower when the CSI (cold start injector) is activated
ohms is the resitance of the coil.. two different things.
I understand your logic and can only guess that the inflow of air at the normal idle is pulling the throttle blades open a tad. After I set my TPS to .65Vdc at min. idle of 450RPM I always see around .74Vdc at normal idle of ~700RPM.
I just checked an old AutoXray scan and see .78Vdc at 660rpm.
Maybe it's a AutoXray problem. I looked over my Datamaster logs and all show no change in TPS voltage at normal idle.
I could understand a change in the TPS voltage between engine not running/engine running - IF the voltage regulator/power supply circuitry built into the ECM was messing up, not providing the "constant" 5.0 volt reference to the TPS circuit.
I cannot understand why the TPS voltage would change with/without the IAC and ESC bypass connected (min idle/normal idle). Shouldn't be any difference.
I would suspect the measurement, first. If the voltage really and truly IS different then Something is going on in the ECM. Take the voltage measurement "manually" with a voltmeter by jumpering the wires out at the TPS itself, and compare the value to what the ECM is seeing and sending out on the datastream (read by the scan tool). They Ought to be the same...
I changed the computer, the car idles a little better. Whats going on, when the scanner tells you the "vehicle not responding" when you try to scan. All connections are good. A local shop informed me, if that happens the ecm is nomally bad and its not reading. I've also recieved anthor set of codes, 13,24,51,46,45,44,43,36,22,21,14. Whats stange is that the car never kick out so many codes before. All this happen right before the scanner was no loner able to read the ecm.
You either have Another bad ECM, or - more likely - a problem with wiring/grounds/power To the ECM.
You can chase individual trouble codes forever, but until you at least verify that the ECM has the power and grounds that it's supposed to have you'll be wasting your time..