PCMForLess vs Dyno tune
To do it right you need to make a first guess that is close, drive the car a lot under varying conditions, data log it, and change it until you get it right, then strap it to the dyno and get wide open throttle right.
Nothing at all against PCMForLess, but if your dyno tuner knows what he's doing, you'll get better results faster. If, however, he just straps it down, runs it on the dyno, tunes WOT, and doesn't touch anything else, you just got ripped. There is a LOT more to tuning than just getting the best track time or dyno number. A proper dyno tune will start long before the car is ever strapped to the dyno. If your changes are extremely radical, you will be better in the long run to buy what you need and tune it yourself.

BTW speed density is a lot more of a bitch to tune at than MAF. Reason being that speed density knows only what you tell it. MAF can always look at the sensor and add fuel accordingly. I've spent many hours driving, data logging, and tuning to get my speed density correct whereas I've only needed to adjust the idle speed on a MAF car that was just as modified. (before anybody jumps by bones on that, it was an 89 MAF car that had no SD tables)
If I was to tune a newer style MAF car that has the backup SD tables I would force it to SD mode until I got it running well, then re-enable the MAF.
Last edited by Nathan Plemons; Nov 6, 2008 at 03:11 PM.

PCM for less tune my ECM and yes, it runs strong but, I took my LT1 to the dyno jet for a RWHP run and the LT1 generated 279 RWHP @ 5,300 RPM. The guy did four runs and in three of them 279 RWHP but the LT1 just stopped making power @5,300 RPM. We all know factory, the LT1 goes to 5,600 RPM.
Let the guy at the dynojet hook it up. Read this, you get what you pay for.







