General engine intake question
if a tpi runner/base stock can flow like 190 CFM and theres 8 runners... why couldnt you theortically throw a 1500 CFM throttle body on a stock system and realize huge gains? I know this doesnt work.... but I dont know WHY it doesnt work... anyone know??John
if a tpi runner/base stock can flow like 190 CFM and theres 8 runners... why couldnt you theortically throw a 1500 CFM throttle body on a stock system and realize huge gains? I know this doesnt work.... but I dont know WHY it doesnt work... anyone know??John
Because in effect you are only using one of those runners at a time
In reality it is a little more than that. You'll have multiple cylinders drawing at once, but not all of them. Some of what you are thinking about is why we have plenums and a mass of stored air above the cylinders.
" stored" so to speak.
However you may lose throttle response at low revs with a larger TB because you have lost flow velocity





If you use another ("better breathing") intake, the "needs" of 350ci @ 6k rpms should still be 600cfm or less. 75cfm per cylinder is required, but it needs to be filled during 1/4 of the 4-stroke cycle. (e.g., 4 times faster). 4x75=300cfm. Multiply that times 2 cylinders = 600cfm.
Interesting.... that's the size they picked for a TB. Keep in mind though that it's rediculously rare to find a motor with 100% VE. IOW, you don't get the cylinders 100% full of air, so a 350 really requires less than 600cfm with the best designs.
For me, I've yet to be convinced you ever need a larger-than-stock TB for any NA 350 motor. But, you see people do it all the time.
gp
Edit: Looks like I've finally received evidence that a 52mm is ideal for some 350 builds. Another forum member sent me an engine simulation using a 350 motor, AFR 195 heads, 1.75 headers, and a short-runner intake. It shows VE rising above 100% and a CFM requirement of 650ish cfm.
So, you MIGHT need a larger TB -- if your mods are extensive enough!!!!
Last edited by GREGGPENN; Dec 28, 2008 at 05:23 PM.










