When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Recognize that GM designs cars to work, and work without problems, in a wide range of environmental conditions. Most of use never expose our cars to anywhere near the designed range. To use a sample size of 1, and say your car always works, is not conclusive at all.
Sure, it's not conclusive. But still, has anyone ever experienced this 'freezing throttle body' while driving a car with L98 engine?
I have tried to find out the conditions, where it even could occur (in real life). During wintertime here in Finland, temperature varies from 40 F usually down close to -30 F (not this winter, at least not yet), sometimes even a bit colder. That should be severe enough to cover a pretty wice variety of weather...
Originally Posted by zzpw3x
Until we drive out cars in Death Valley, and then in Alaska (and test in on dozens of cars) all we can do is guess.
But even one test is better than no test at all.
Originally Posted by zzpw3x
That being said, if your car is only driven in the summer, it would seem it is safe to bypass the throttle body.
Moisture and high velocity would play a factor as well? I've had cold track events with rain and no issues too. If you want to be super careful then don't do the bypass.
Okay the Throttle bodys are different mine only has the two outlets on the passenger side, the one for the vavle cover and another one below it which is going to the heater core,so I can just run that hose to the front of the intake and the other to the water pump for the bypass.
no icing of the throttle body in scotland, but i did regularly get icing of the carburetor on my 1970 454 vette, in the winter, but only from cold start, once the engine is warm icing doesn't cause major issues, but when it did happen it caused the throttle to stick open.
no icing of the throttle body in scotland, but i did regularly get icing of the carburetor on my 1970 454 vette, in the winter, but only from cold start, once the engine is warm icing doesn't cause major issues, but when it did happen it caused the throttle to stick open.
Carburettors are a different story, because gas is sprayed very near the 'flaps' (sorry, my vocabulary is restricted, but I hope you understand what I mean) and the vapourising of gas makes them colder => they're much more liable to form ice and get stuck.
But with L98's throttle body, the gasoline is sprayed very much further, so gas vapourising isn't an issue.
I know it goes against conventional wisdom of what I've seen written in lots of places, but I don't see the heated TB as being much of an issue, since even at low speeds flowing air at 50 cfm, the air doesn't have much time to heat up - the surface area of those walls that are heated is dwarfed in comparison to the temperatures and surface area inside the remainder of the intake passages - I'd focus more on lowering the temperature, and more particularly flow path, of incoming air by other means. At higher engines speeds it becomes even less of an issue. Same train of thought applies to re-location of intake air temperature sensor. Ideally, it should be located inside the manifold, if the intent is to measure the temperature of the air charge. If the intent is to measure ambient temperature, which is what in effect a relocation of that sensor to the air cleaner box accomplishes, to fool the ECM into providing a richer charge, then why not just relocate it so it senses ambient air by locating it in another location, such as the fenderwell ? I've left mine stock in both these regards.
I've driven my 91 as low as 7 degrees with the TB coolant lines bypassed and had no problems
Today it was 1 F (-17 C), I drove fo about 50 miles, no problem. Last winter I think the lowest temperatute, when I did a longer run, was ca. -15 F. Surprise, surprise: no problem.
Today it was 1 F (-17 C), I drove fo about 50 miles, no problem. Last winter I think the lowest temperatute, when I did a longer run, was ca. -15 F. Surprise, surprise: no problem.
You should have worked for GM, you could have saved them a lot of $$ with your scientific research/results !!
"Throttle icing can be divided into two categories. The
first category is the adhesion of ice to the stationary
throttle bore wall and valve area after the vehicle has
been shut down after an extended drive. This icing is
typically called “soak icing”. This throttle icing condition
can cause the electronically actuated throttle to close
improperly thereby not controlling the air into the engine.
This lack of control in airflow can cause engine stalls and
idle instability issues. The ice formation in the throttle
can also occur during the operation of the vehicle with
the throttle at various positions due to a high incoming
moisture concentration. This type of icing is typically
called “run icing”. “Run icing” can cause the throttle plate
to stick in the open position, also resulting in the inability
to control air flow."
All right already, we know why GM ran coolant through the throttle body. Has anyone actually had the icing occur on their car (carburated apps. withheld)? If not, then we can say, from the extremely technical corvette forum survey, that icing is not going to be an issue for the OP as it hasn't been for anyone else in this thread.
The reason I did mine was so i could remove the TB without having to worry about coolant spilling all over the place. If it has the added effect of even a marginal increase in power or cooler running, then so be it.
You should have worked for GM, you could have saved them a lot of $$ with your scientific research/results !!
Oh, really?! Is the problem my poor English, that you just don't get my point or what?
Originally Posted by janarvae
All right already, we know why GM ran coolant through the throttle body. Has anyone actually had the icing occur on their car (carburated apps. withheld)? If not, then we can say, from the extremely technical corvette forum survey, that icing is not going to be an issue for the OP as it hasn't been for anyone else in this thread.
The reason I did mine was so i could remove the TB without having to worry about coolant spilling all over the place. If it has the added effect of even a marginal increase in power or cooler running, then so be it.
Oh, really?! Is the problem my poor English, that you just don't get my point or what?
Don't confuse the issue, as your English is fine. It is your conclusions based off of 1 car in 1 country that is flawed. And from your "test findings", you are summizing that no conditions exist that warrants the need for the TB coolant passage because your car never exhibited iceing. If you read the article I posted, you will see that TB iceing does occur under certain conditions. If I were living in the the northern part of the USA, which is experiencing an intense cold snap, I would feel a lot safer having coolant running through my TB.
All I am trying to say is that the small sample sizes that we see here are not conclusive. Caution would be advised if you are driving your corvette in cold climates. IMO, there is no way that I would bypass the throttle body if I drove in the winter.
Clearly, the Delphi paper previously posted shows that freezing can happen.
I worked for Delphi for 10 years (and bailed before the bankruptcy). If a design works 99 out of 100 times, that's not good enough. A failure that could result in a safety issue is minimized to the greatest extent possible.
Until we get 1000 posts stating that they did the mod, and drove it in freezing temperatures for months on end, I'll remain an skeptic. Of course, the dead ones won't be able to report back....
Don't confuse the issue, as your English is fine. It is your conclusions based off of 1 car in 1 country that is flawed. And from your "test findings", you are summizing that no conditions exist that warrants the need for the TB coolant passage because your car never exhibited iceing.
Well, I have tried to find such 'real life' conditions, that problems would occur with my car. So far, none. If you (or anyone else) can specify at least temperature, in which icing would occur "most probably", I would like to know. And try to get it to freeze in practise
Originally Posted by joecarter85
If you read the article I posted, you will see that TB iceing does occur under certain conditions. If I were living in the the northern part of the USA, which is experiencing an intense cold snap, I would feel a lot safer having coolant running through my TB.
I did read it and as far as I understood it correctly, they got some ice formation, which prevented the throttle valve from closing completely (how much 'open'?). But how close are those 'test' conditions to 'real life' conditions? I didn't see that in this test the warming on TB by heat conduction from the block would have been taken into consideration.
And was that throttle body structure from a L98 engine?
All I am trying to say is that the small sample sizes that we see here are not conclusive. Caution would be advised if you are driving your corvette in cold climates. IMO, there is no way that I would bypass the throttle body if I drove in the winter.
I can appreciate anyone's decision not to perform this mod if they feel it is unsafe. I see you haven't been a member of this board for long which may make you think this is a relatively new topic. I can assure you there have been hundreds of threads on this very topic over the years and all discuss the reasons why the coolant line is routed through the TB. That being said, each of those threads also had members chime in with their experiences of driving in all types of conditions with the TB coolant line bypassed. I can't recall a single instance in which someone had an issue.
I might also add that both of my other vehicles (non-corvettes) have TBs that do not have coolant lines routed through them. I've never experienced icing in those either.
I wouldn't expect that un-doing the bypass to cause any problem, in most instances.
Understand, GM put the LT-1 in Firebirds, Camaros, Impalas, Corvette and the decision at some point was between having no throttle body heating and facing a possible vehicle recall (all LT-1's, even if only some experienced icing), or putting a couple extra hoses on and routing the coolant through the TB.
The issue wasn't the low probability of a given vehicle experiencing icing, rather, the costs for recalling more vehicles that ice'd, plus the negative publicity damage it would cause. For GM, the cost of a couple hoses was less and the decision was made, and no LT-1 vehicles have ever been recalled for TB icing.
I wouldn't expect that un-doing the bypass to cause any problem, in most instances.
Understand, GM put the LT-1 in Firebirds, Camaros, Impalas, Corvette and the decision at some point was between having no throttle body heating and facing a possible vehicle recall (all LT-1's, even if only some experienced icing), or putting a couple extra hoses on and routing the coolant through the TB.
The issue wasn't the low probability of a given vehicle experiencing icing, rather, the costs for recalling more vehicles that ice'd, plus the negative publicity damage it would cause. For GM, the cost of a couple hoses was less and the decision was made, and no LT-1 vehicles have ever been recalled for TB icing.
GM, like any large American corporation, has to deal with the legal guys and the bean counter guys! If you want to modify your car then do it. On the other hand, if you live close to the artic circle you may want to leave it as GM engineers designed it.
So what if they did ice up? Just pop the hood and move them manually. I agree that it is very unlikely to happen but I wouldnt say its impossible. I havent bypassed mine because my hoses are still in good shape and I see no reason to mess with it until I need to.
So little hot coolant goes through the TB, there's more heat hitting the plenum from just under the hood. I did it and felt foolish after I saw the whole thing