C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

Rebuilding/Upgrading LT4 with 165k

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-25-2009, 02:21 PM
  #21  
pianoguy
Safety Car
 
pianoguy's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2007
Location: Apple Valley MN
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ChrisWhewell
excellent. How are those things balanced ? I understand the front is zero balance. Does it matter in the rear whether one puts a flexplate or flywheel onto it ? i.e. is it balanced specifically for a flywheel, or specifically for a flexplate, or was it factory balanced so that either one will work fine ?
Good question - I imagine it is not internally balanced, and that you'd have to balance a flywheel or flexplate to match.
Old 06-25-2009, 03:32 PM
  #22  
Mojave
Melting Slicks
 
Mojave's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: College Station TX
Posts: 2,231
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ChrisWhewell
Its a durability issue. Once that old crank gets a little flexed and blows up, you'll be singing a different tune !!

4 bolt bolts aren't hard to find, try ARP # 134-5601.
I'm not too worried.
Old 06-25-2009, 04:23 PM
  #23  
BrianCunningham
Team Owner
 
BrianCunningham's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Boston, Dallas, Detroit, SoCal, back to Boston MA
Posts: 30,622
Received 239 Likes on 167 Posts

Default

They're externally balanced at the back.

The dual disk clutch I bought has a removable weight.
Old 06-25-2009, 04:30 PM
  #24  
MK 82
Melting Slicks
 
MK 82's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: Palm Beach
Posts: 3,286
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

They didn't. L98s are 2 bolt.

Originally Posted by ChrisWhewell
Good question. Why did GM put 4-bolt blocks in corvettes when 2-bolt blocks would have worked fine ?
Old 06-25-2009, 04:56 PM
  #25  
ChrisWhewell
Pro
 
ChrisWhewell's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 686
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MK 82
They didn't. L98s are 2 bolt.
They did. Mine's a 4-bolt.

But thanks, I didn't know L98's came with 2-bolt blocks. Never needed to know. Were they dogs on power output ?

Why did gm use 4-bolt blocks in the LT1 ?

Last edited by ChrisWhewell; 06-25-2009 at 05:00 PM.
Old 06-25-2009, 07:57 PM
  #26  
cv67
Team Owner
 
cv67's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: altered state
Posts: 81,242
Received 3,043 Likes on 2,602 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05

Default

L98s didnt make enough rpm to warrant using a 4 bolt...or decent rods...or
Old 06-25-2009, 08:17 PM
  #27  
MK 82
Melting Slicks
 
MK 82's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: Palm Beach
Posts: 3,286
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

So is my LT4. My 86 was not. You need to know when you make statements that allegedly apply to all Corvettes. Perhaps you should not till you know a bit more about them.

Originally Posted by ChrisWhewell
They did. Mine's a 4-bolt.

But thanks, I didn't know L98's came with 2-bolt blocks. Never needed to know. Were they dogs on power output ?

Why did gm use 4-bolt blocks in the LT1 ?

Last edited by MK 82; 06-25-2009 at 08:23 PM.
Old 06-25-2009, 08:34 PM
  #28  
ChrisWhewell
Pro
 
ChrisWhewell's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 686
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MK 82
So is my LT4. My 86 was not. You need to know when you make statements that allegedly apply to all Corvettes. Perhaps you should not till you know a bit more about them.
LOLLLL I didn't write ALL corvettes bub, you read that in there, for what reason, I know not, perhaps to start some internet bombastic drivel. Maybe an eye exam is over-due.

As far as me waiting to write about things until I know more, you can go pound salt on that one. Lots of folks who don't know things write in on here every day - that's what forums are for - learning. If you don't like what I write, just ignore me. Or, waste some more time in picking senseless internet spats !!!!
Old 06-25-2009, 09:16 PM
  #29  
MK 82
Melting Slicks
 
MK 82's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: Palm Beach
Posts: 3,286
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Now you have hurt my feelings!
Old 06-25-2009, 09:31 PM
  #30  
mtwoolford
Melting Slicks
 
mtwoolford's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: folsom california
Posts: 3,482
Received 194 Likes on 180 Posts

Default

Bob:

I've read with interest the replies you've been getting; some go pretty far afield.

Corvettes are expensive, and (with the exception of an LT5), LT4s are the most expensive of all C4s.

With that said, and your $3,000 budget, let me relate my own experience "refreshing" an LT4 engine which had a bad cam, some bearing damage (but a serviceable crank) and, with similiar (but less) mileage than your engine, which means most everything is worn out, or close enough that replacement made good sense:

(working back in time):

oil temp sensor: $43, napa
air filter: $29, napa
throttle body gasket set: $45, dealer
clutch slave cylinder: $118, kragen
Idle air contgrol valve: $79, kragen
spark plug wire seperators: $21, kragen
PVC hose, grommets, temp sensor, T'sat, etc.: $123, ecklers
alternator connector, distributor wiring harness: $54, corvette central
upper oil pump drive assembly: $150, herronperformance
oil pump relief spring: $23, lingenfelter
water pump drive assembly: $137, vintage parts
oil pump stud: $11, summit
LT4 "Hot Cam" spring set, valve seals: $116, dealer
roller rocker arm (one bad): $85, dealer
oil pump, main bearings, rod bearings, gasket set: $337, summit
water pump, t'stat: $231, lee auto
hydraulic lifter set and crankshaft hub: $451, dealer
Opti spark distributor, plug wires: $442, summit
timing chain, extreme duty: $262, summit
oxygen sensors (four total): $370, kragen
LT4 "Hot Cam": $222, kragen
belt tensioner and belt idler pulley: $78, summit
spark plugs: $40, kragen
fuel filter: $20, kragen

TOTAL: $3,488

no machine work was done and I did all the labor myself

It does not include fluids, it does not include a power steering pump (that failed) and hoses, it does not include replacement of the rear spring which was delaminating and looked like a mad porcupine, it does not include replacing the a/c compressor, clutch and accumulator (which is very expensive and not a do it yourself project); nor does it include replacing the steering rack and tie rod ends ; nor does it include replacing six u joints, or the front brake pads. The steering column and exhaust system were also replaced as was thirty some different suspension bushings.

I am not even mentioning the costs of catalytic converters, since these vary widely; suffice to say they are MUCH more expensive for LT based engines.

I really believe you'll eat up your $3,000 budget in very short order.
LT specific parts are very expensive compared to earlier conventional small block parts; check any catalog.

I repeat my earlier advice; sell your LT4, take the proceeds and your $3,000 budget and fine a clean, low mileage C4 with a conventional small block 350 (up to and including 1991).

best of luck, please let us all know what you decide.
Old 06-25-2009, 09:36 PM
  #31  
mtwoolford
Melting Slicks
 
mtwoolford's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: folsom california
Posts: 3,482
Received 194 Likes on 180 Posts

Default

p.s. the LT4 "Hot Cam", $222, was from summit; and ,
the belt tensioner and belt idler pulley, $78 was from kragen
Old 06-25-2009, 09:37 PM
  #32  
ChrisWhewell
Pro
 
ChrisWhewell's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 686
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MK 82
Now you have hurt my feelings!
)

Cheers ole boy !! I hope you have a wonderful evening Lets do it again sometime.

Seriously, I appreciate your comment yesterday on the LT4, crank, etc. and today on the L82. Thanks for all of it.



Quick Reply: Rebuilding/Upgrading LT4 with 165k



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:02 AM.