When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I ran my first autocross to day and loved it but it feels like i get allot of body roll in my 88 convertible. Whats the best way and cheapest way to stiffen things up a bit?
I ran my first autocross to day and loved it but it feels like i get allot of body roll in my 88 convertible. Whats the best way and cheapest way to stiffen things up a bit?
your vette USES body roll to create 'camber change' to maintain full tire tread contact with the ground, by complex suspension design...reducing body roll will likely degrade your car's cornering ability, unless you make other mods (most contrary to normal street requirements for tire wear/ etc)
your vette USES body roll to create 'camber change' to maintain full tire tread contact with the ground, by complex suspension design...reducing body roll will likely degrade your car's cornering ability, unless you make other mods (most contrary to normal street requirements for tire wear/ etc)
This is totally and completely wrong. Like any suspension that is setup properly, C4's gain camber in compression, but you still lose more camber to body roll than you gain back. In an ideal world, your car would have zero body roll and your tires would always the optimum contact patch. Clearly, this isn't the case. Increasing the wheel rate (either by stiffer springs or larger sway bars) will improve grip by reducing body roll and the associated camber loss. Too stiff, however, and the car will skip and skate over bumps.
To the OP: quite honestly, the thing holding you back now is you, not the car. Auto-x is 60% driver, 30% tires, and 10% everything else (car setup, etc). You really should focus on improving your performance before you go changing the car. However, to answer your question, you can upgrade to Z51 springs and bars, get custom springs from someplace like VB&P, or change to coil overs. I strongly recommended leaving the springs alone, getting a good performance alignment, and go improve your driving by going to more AX events and getting lots and lots of seat time.
In an ideal world, your car would have zero body roll and your tires would always the optimum contact patch.
this is totally wrong ...your tires are made from rubber (synthetic, but still very flexible) and during lateral acceleration (cornering) the tires WILL ''roll under'', reducing tire/road contact to a sliver of rubber at the tire's edge if the tire is held near vertical...changing wheel camber by using body roll/ suspension member length interaction is how ''those who know what they're doing'' keep the tire working to it's max capability.
bbtw, in jounce (wheel travel is upward relative to chassis) a C4 will LOOSE camber (wheel moves ''in'' at the top, this is "negative'' camber)
this is totally wrong ...your tires are made from rubber (synthetic, but still very flexible) and during lateral acceleration (cornering) the tires WILL ''roll under'', reducing tire/road contact to a sliver of rubber at the tire's edge if the tire is held near vertical...changing wheel camber by using body roll/ suspension member length interaction is how ''those who know what they're doing'' keep the tire working to it's max capability.
bbtw, in jounce (wheel travel is upward relative to chassis) a C4 will LOOSE camber (wheel moves ''in'' at the top, this is "negative'' camber)
Are you seriously telling me body roll makes your car handle better? I understand you don't want the car to be overly stiff, but if you could set it up with no body roll and still be compliant enough to handle bumps, you would. Eliminating body roll means the car will transfer weight faster, be more responsive, and you could set your static camber for maximum grip and not have to worry about camber curves at all.
No crap it gains negative camber in jounce, THAT'S WHAT YOU WANT. You LOSE negative camber to body roll, and you gain back some of that negative camber with negative camber gain. You don't want the tire near vertical, you want negative camber all the time. If you end up at zero camber (or positive camber), you screwed up.
tires are made from rubber (synthetic, but still very flexible) and during lateral acceleration (cornering) the tires WILL ''roll under'', reducing tire/road contact to a sliver of rubber at the tire's edge if the tire is held near vertical
This is part of the reason you add negative camber. With less body roll the car becomes more responsive but the tire still rolls under a bit like you mentioned. If you have negative camber the tire will flatten onto more of the contact patch instead of rolling onto the side. This is ideal. Body roll is never ideal.