When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The 700R4/4L60/4L60E are all the same basic transmission, and most of the the heavier, newer, parts will retro into the older units..
LS Vehicles of all types came equipped with 4L60 type units for years..
Well one of the other people in this thread (krusty84) said that the point of this thread is to build a "budget" car. Well, if you have to upgrade your 700r4 transmission with the heavier, newer parts from a later model transmission then what is that going to add to the cost of this "budget" car? A couple grand? More? Not to mention that the automatic cars come with the weak Dana 36 rear end that will not handle the extra power of even a mildly built LS engine. Now you've got to add the cost of swapping it out for a Dana 44 rear end which is better than the Dana 36 but still not capable of handling large amounts of horsepower. Most people that want to do an LS engine swap want to do it because of the large amount of power that can be made from an LS engine relative cheaply. Building a 600 horsepower LS engine won't cost too much but upgrading the rest of the drivetrain to be able to handle it WILL cost a lot. That's the whole point I've been trying to make. If you're not prepared to spend the kind of money that it's going to cost to upgrade the drivetrain to handle more power than it's capable of handling then you might as well just build the engine that's already in the car up to the maximum power level that the drivetrain can handle and call it a day.
Last edited by TheGreek!; May 2, 2019 at 04:22 PM.
"The drivetrain sucks and isnt worth putting money into so dont do an LS swap and keep the engine that cant break the drivetrain".
Haha... Pretty much.
What is funny is that although a mildly built 4.8/5.3 is going to produce great rwhp, they aren't torque monsters. They will likely produce similar or even less rwtq than a lightly modified L98. So the stock 700r and D36 probably aren't going to be all that much of a concern to begin with.
"The drivetrain sucks and isnt worth putting money into so dont do an LS swap and keep the engine that cant break the drivetrain".
That's not what I'm trying to say. If you can afford to upgrade the drivetrain in it then by all means do so. C4s are great cars and worth upgrading but it will not be cheap to do it. The words "Corvette" and "budget" usually don't go together unless the word "large" is in front of the word "budget". I love my C4's and plan on upgrading the drivetrains eventually but I'm not going to lie to myself and think that's it's going to be cheap because it won't be.
Last edited by TheGreek!; May 2, 2019 at 05:19 PM.
What is funny is that although a mildly built 4.8/5.3 is going to produce great rwhp, they aren't torque monsters. They will likely produce similar or even less rwtq than a lightly modified L98. So the stock 700r and D36 probably aren't going to be all that much of a concern to begin with.
I have a turbocharged 4.8 in front of my Dana 36. Haven't ran it with slicks yet, but with decent 325/30/19s I can footbrake launch if pretty hard with no issues. Actually hoping to best the 10.97 Dana 36 record soon. Torque stresses parts, not horsepower. When it comes to launching, the amount of stress placed on the rear end parts is a combination of G-forces and weight. Obviously a Dana 36 isn't going to handle a 3G launch at 3500 lbs. But a 2G launch at 2400 lbs? Possibly. Easy into the launch, increase power as G forces decrease. It'll stay happy.
Originally Posted by TheGreek!
That's not what I'm trying to say. If you can afford to upgrade the drivetrain in it then by all means do so. C4s are great cars and worth upgrading but it will not be cheap to do it. The words "Corvette" and "budget" usually don't go together unless the word "large" is in front of the word "budget". I love my C4's and plan on upgrading the drivetrains eventually but I'm not going to lie to myself and think that's it's going to be cheap because it won't be.
That is basically what you said though. I just summarized it for you. I'm fairly perplexed by how much money some people can spend for such little result. I swapped a TH400 into my car for $200. Made a bracket in about 2 hours out of 1/4" plate steel to bolt it into the C-beam, and used the stock driveshaft. All I had to do was buy a proper length yoke and U joint, then used a cheap ebay flexible dipstick. Fit like a glove. That 3.07 rear gear meant that I can cruise the highway at a manageable RPM (2400, which is only 1/3rd of the rev limit of my 4.8). To the guys that have to buy everything, sure, it might be more expensive. The Corvette crowd seems to fall victim to that scenario more than any other crowd I've ever seen.
I'm running a 2005 LQ9 (6L truck engine) on the stock 700R (reused the LQ9 flex plate) and dana 36. These days LS swaps are cheap and easy to find. The junk yards all over are filled with them.
The mechanics of the LSx swap aren't that tough. You've shown that. Dropping in a Gen III PCM and harness isn't even that tough. The problem with an LS swap in the late C4s is that the PCM sends a lot of data to the CCM over the ALDL serial bus. The CCM then drives the gauges. Without that PCM and serial connection in place I lose a lot of my dash functions, some HVAC functions and probably other things I haven't discovered yet. Do you have a solution for this? I also haven't come across solutions for retaining my ZF6 that are low buck. I think the +.400" thick swap McLeod flywheel would do it, but that's $405 alone.
So, for those of us wanting to retain the true GT (grand touring) nature of the C4, what's the real cost to swap an LT1/4, ZF6 car to an LS engine and not lose any functions except maybe the MPG/DTE fuel data?
Yea, I think LS swaps w/ 700r/4l60/th350/th400 can be done pretty easily and cheaply.
I think the huge disconnect between a lot of guys on this forum is simply over the details. Guys that have a nice car and wish to retain full functionality and have a very clean swap and guys that don't care much about that and just want a different platform that runs and drives and goes fast.
The swaps can be janked in there or done extremely well and there is a huge price and time/labor difference between the two.
Yea, I think LS swaps w/ 700r/4l60/th350/th400 can be done pretty easily and cheaply.
I think the huge disconnect between a lot of guys on this forum is simply over the details. Guys that have a nice car and wish to retain full functionality and have a very clean swap and guys that don't care much about that and just want a different platform that runs and drives and goes fast.
The swaps can be janked in there or done extremely well and there is a huge price and time/labor difference between the two.
IM all for LS swaps. Have guys in town with twin turbo 1000hp POS motors that keep kickin. There’s ways to make it work. Always is
especially with a Turbo400 lol
Getting the engine in and power to the ground is not the hard part. Keeping all the goofy late C4 electronics working is the troublesome part. If you can't get the Gen III PCM to speak the 8192 baud ALDL serial protocol with the CCM or get the CCM to understand the Gen III PCM OBD-II then you have to put a protocol translator in the middle. I'm thinking I call Torqhead to see how they got the Gen III PCM and C4 CCM to communicate and see if he'd do the CCM work without me buying all the 24x LTx parts which an LSx obviously doesn't need.
Getting the engine in and power to the ground is not the hard part. Keeping all the goofy late C4 electronics working is the troublesome part. If you can't get the Gen III PCM to speak the 8192 baud ALDL serial protocol with the CCM or get the CCM to understand the Gen III PCM OBD-II then you have to put a protocol translator in the middle. I'm thinking I call Torqhead to see how they got the Gen III PCM and C4 CCM to communicate and see if he'd do the CCM work without me buying all the 24x LTx parts which an LSx obviously doesn't need.
I've only dealt with the early C4. Much easier swap.
For the later C4, 99.9% of the electronics can be wired independently of the CCM. None of the HVAC controls nor the rear defrost NEED the CCM to function, they are just simply controlled by it in the stock configuration. With a little extra time and very little money involved, you can wire them all just like any other car that doesn't have a CCM and retain normal functionality.
The gauges being the only exception. I'm not completely sure how the gauges handle the data. With the earlier cluster, you would just adapt all of your sensors on the new engine and the rest could be fairly easily configured to work with the stock cluster minus the MPG data.
I've only dealt with the early C4. Much easier swap.
For the later C4, 99.9% of the electronics can be wired independently of the CCM. None of the HVAC controls nor the rear defrost NEED the CCM to function, they are just simply controlled by it in the stock configuration. With a little extra time and very little money involved, you can wire them all just like any other car that doesn't have a CCM and retain normal functionality.
The gauges being the only exception. I'm not completely sure how the gauges handle the data. With the earlier cluster, you would just adapt all of your sensors on the new engine and the rest could be fairly easily configured to work with the stock cluster minus the MPG data.
I agree 100%, my 85 vette was super easy swap. No regrets. The car went from an ok ride to a really fun ride. My car still has tons of room left I need more power. With the LS platform, the sky (ok your wallet) is the limit.
The gauges in a late C4 like mine are driven by the CCM using a serial data stream provided by the PCM. The gauges don't handle the data, the CCM does. It seems more and more likely I will keep this car LT1 powered as it can be made to meet my modest power goals and I can tune the original PCM myself to accommodate the needed engine mods (cam, ported heads and intake manifold). Coil-near plug and more engine management features would be nice to have, but since 400 hp is enough for the open track events I do there's not much incentive to go LSx. If I just have to have turbo LSx power I'll find an earlier car that already needs an engine.
If I am going to build a race car there is nothing attaching me to a corvette and other options are available.
If my L98 C4 motor blew up tomorrow I would be looking for options. The car is a weekend and occasional driver. The things steering me away from an LS swap and keeping me in the SBC are the lack of a good way to interface the instrument panel and the difficulty with air conditioning (I live in Alabama). If you could solve those problems without cutting up the chassis, and my motor blew up, I would probably consider an LS swap.
As far as your headers go, not sure if you guys are selling full length or shortys. That said, if the stock manifolds fit from whatever donor I got I would probably use them as a first choice since they came with the motor and are "free". If they didn't fit my second choice would be a set of shortys designed for a C4/LS. If the only things out there were full length headers I would probably not go with an LS or fab my own shortys. I have had full length headers before and for me they wee just not worth the extra problems (leaks, sound, difficulty getting them in and out and working on the bottom of the engine.
Anyway, hope that helps answer your question. That is just me though so mileage may vary.
I think the Ls swap dash issue has been largely solved on early C4's (Pre 1990). You basically just run a second set of stock C4 sensors in the LS and those give the dash its sensor data. You also run a regular set of LS sensors and that gives whatever computer system you decide to use Its sensor data. A lot of people don't do A/C with LS swaps but I've seen a number of pictures of people using readily avaliable high mount A/C LS brackets and Saden compressors. So I think most if not all the issues now have solutions. Wiring is of course always going to be a pain in ANY LS swap. On A Late C4 I wouldn't bother but i'm sure it could be done and some have done it sucessfully.
If I am going to build a race car there is nothing attaching me to a corvette and other options are available.
If my L98 C4 motor blew up tomorrow I would be looking for options. The car is a weekend and occasional driver. The things steering me away from an LS swap and keeping me in the SBC are the lack of a good way to interface the instrument panel and the difficulty with air conditioning (I live in Alabama). If you could solve those problems without cutting up the chassis, and my motor blew up, I would probably consider an LS swap.
As far as your headers go, not sure if you guys are selling full length or shortys. That said, if the stock manifolds fit from whatever donor I got I would probably use them as a first choice since they came with the motor and are "free". If they didn't fit my second choice would be a set of shortys designed for a C4/LS. If the only things out there were full length headers I would probably not go with an LS or fab my own shortys. I have had full length headers before and for me they wee just not worth the extra problems (leaks, sound, difficulty getting them in and out and working on the bottom of the engine.
Anyway, hope that helps answer your question. That is just me though so mileage may vary.
A/C isn't difficult. You can get a bracket and compressor to mount to the LS, you will just have to make your own A/C lines (they are fairly cheap and you can rent the tools to do it in a day). Everything else can be retained in stock C4 form. You will just need to wire the controls in a more conventional way. Not re-inventing the wheel, just wiring in a universal stand-alone method.
I think the Ls swap dash issue has been largely solved on early C4's (Pre 1990). You basically just run a second set of stock C4 sensors in the LS and those give the dash its sensor data. You also run a regular set of LS sensors and that gives whatever computer system you decide to use Its sensor data. A lot of people don't do A/C with LS swaps but I've seen a number of pictures of people using readily avaliable high mount A/C LS brackets and Saden compressors. So I think most if not all the issues now have solutions. Wiring is of course always going to be a pain in ANY LS swap. On A Late C4 I wouldn't bother but i'm sure it could be done and some have done it sucessfully.
I think the gauge cluster and A/C issues are just excuses for a lot of these guys because they hate the LS swap idea in general.
If you install an LS, the car becomes unoriginal so what difference does it really make if you install an aftermarket gauge cluster?
I can understand folks not wanting to hack the K-member for the C5 A/C compressor location as there really is no reversal of that, but not wanting to do a swap because you can't use 24-30 year old gauges seems like a weak argument to me.
I think the gauge cluster and A/C issues are just excuses for a lot of these guys because they hate the LS swap idea in general.
If you install an LS, the car becomes unoriginal so what difference does it really make if you install an aftermarket gauge cluster?
I can understand folks not wanting to hack the K-member for the C5 A/C compressor location as there really is no reversal of that, but not wanting to do a swap because you can't use 24-30 year old gauges seems like a weak argument to me.
I kind of like the digital read out for oil pressure, temp and voltage but a mechanical tach and speedo would be better for a built car... the refresh on the factory ones is too slow for anything moderate. But that being said interfacing the early ones is simple, they're equivalent to just adding analog gauges which most people do anyway. Its nuts. If you want to build the sleeper, you're going to pay. Otherwise a set of gauges is a couple hundred bucks. For a few pennies more you can feed gauges from the ecm outputs on the LS. Not too big a deal really.
The A/C is interesting but like said, can be remedied. Custom length flex lines are pretty cheap and work just fine...
... For a few pennies more you can feed gauges from the ecm outputs on the LS. Not too big a deal really....
Cool. How do I, for pennies, feed the Gen III PCM OBD II engine data to my 8192 baud CCM so that my original gauges work? I don't want to toss the original gauges because a lot of vehicle diagnostic information is displayed there. And I do use that data. I recently diagnosed a no-crank condition using the CCM diagnostic mode.