When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'm heading out to swap a rear hub on my LT4 car. FSM says torque for rear caliper mounting bracket bolts is 116 lb-ft (+/-15 lb-ft). Is this correct? Seems mighty heavy.
FSM also calls for some adhesives on some bolts. Do y'all use any?
My '88 FSM lists 70 ft lbs for the rear bracket bolts. Always use thread locker.
It's possible they have the torque so high because the FSM says to always use new bolts. Torque them once and they stretch then get throw out. I've been reusing mine at 70.
The bracket bolts are torqued to 70 or 75 ft-lbs depending on the year.
You can re-use the existing bolts but apply new "blue" threadlocker. Clean the bolt threads of the old threadlocker using a wire brush. Do the same with the bolt holes. Use something like Loctite Blue on the threads and torque to spec. Don't use the Red threadlocker as that stuff requires heat to release.
The two small bolts that hold the caliper have two different torque specs Upper to 23 ft-lbs and lower to 16. Don't know why that is as the front caliper bolts are 23 ft-lbs for both upper and lower.
It would be a good idea to clean, inspect, and re-lube the guide pins to make sure the caliper body moves freely.
Thanks for the replies, everyone. The idea that those bolts should be torqued to 166 lb-ft, as called for by the FSM, seemed insane to me (I just noticed that in my original post, I mis-typed it as 116 lb-ft), as 166 lb-ft is two lb-ft more than is specified for the huge spindle nut!
Truth is, with the access so confined back there, it wasn't easy applying the 80 lb-ft that I decided to go with. I can't imagine how I could have gotten anywhere near 166 lb-ft on the upper bolt, as I had to use an ancient Snap-On Torque-O-Meter that I haven't used in decades because my click-type wrench was too long to fit inside of the wheel well, and that old Snap-On wrench just didn't give the leverage I'd have needed to go much above 100 lb-ft.
I'm happy to say that the job's done, and the car's down off the lift. It's time to tackle some other chores now.
On my 89 it says the same, 70 ft pds on the rear. I also noticed the one on the front seems high , mine says 137 ft pds with tread locker. Is this what everyone uses??
If it was on the brakes it's because it vibrated loose. I had a caliper bolt fall out at an event last summer. It had thread locker on it. Prep also plays a big role, the threads must be cleaned. Locktite makes a prep compound too.
For the front you can turn the wheel and the angle provides a much better swing for the torque wrench.
On my 89 it says the same, 70 ft pds on the rear. I also noticed the one on the front seems high , mine says 137 ft pds with tread locker. Is this what everyone uses??
My '91 and '94 manuals both call for 70 lb-ft on the rear caliper brackets. For some reason my '96 manual calls for 166 lb-ft on the rears.
Beats me. But I'm betting it's an error in the '96 FSM.