maf lessons


Last edited by boardroomjimmy; Mar 22, 2010 at 10:54 PM. Reason: sp





Seems this guy pulled off his MAF and claimed he had broken the generals code.
SO the discussion ensued for weeks and the mods had a hay day...
So as a MAF user I'll say this once, if it runs better without the MAF, something is wrong.
It's no different than the '90 - '93 (IIRC) cars which are Speed Density (no MAF) from the factory.
Last edited by WW7; Mar 23, 2010 at 12:14 PM.

ECM/PCM are programed (chipped on early models without MAP backup) with an extra "limp home" mode that gives the computer backup default data in case of failure. The car will run like crap with the MAF disconnected on earlier models unless it is a newer model that has both a MAP & MAF combined setup.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
so if i unplug my maf, and the car dies i have a problem with map, rpm or inlet temp?
thanks
matt
Seems this guy pulled off his MAF and claimed he had broken the generals code.
SO the discussion ensued for weeks and the mods had a hay day...
So as a MAF user I'll say this once, if it runs better without the MAF, something is wrong.

It would be nice to know the Year, as until '90, only a MAF was used for Air Flow and Load. The balance of the L98's then switched to a MAP or speed density system, eliminating the MAF. Later, the LT1's adopted a MAF (for air flow) and a MAP (for load). Today, most vehicles use only a MAF. But the principles for using voltage drop to determine what's going on remains the same. And realistically, the best way to determine if the info is accurate is with a scanner, so go get one or find some means of determining what's really going on so that you don't end up with a lot of spare parts that you'll probably never need.
As an answer to your original question, when the MAF is unplugged or faulted with a code 33 or code 34 present, the ecm replaces the normal MAF airflow signal that is provided by the sensor and internal calibration tables with a calculated default airflow signal.
The default airflow calculation is comprised of 3 basic inputs (throttle position, rpm and IAC position) and some calibratable elements including:
A base offset which is equivalent to the airflow through the closed throttle, an IAC position dependent component, and a 3d look up based on tps% vs rpm.
The end result is then limited by the normal max airflow vs rpm table in the usual manner.
Using these simple inputs, the resulting default airflow signal can be calibrated to behave much like an actual MAF. It's not perfect, but can work very well under most operating conditions when tuned properly.
Closed loop fueling will still function and tune the fuel trims around any calibration errors.
I don't advocate relying upon this method for primary fueling as some have done in the past (with my assistance), since there are better options available, but it can certainly offer a nice backup when the MAF does fail.
Last edited by tequilaboy; Mar 23, 2010 at 04:46 PM.
Site your sources so we'll all know stuff isn't just being made up. Lots of guys make stuff up and try to pass it off as science. When challenged, be prepared to site your source(s).
Keep it on topic and NOT engage in personal attacks. Take control of your testosterone.
If you don't, you can bet the Moderator(s) will step in to restore civility; and he/they should. Otherwise things get out of control quickly.
Jake
Site your sources so we'll all know stuff isn't just being made up. Lots of guys make stuff up and try to pass it off as science. When challenged, be prepared to site your source(s).
Keep it on topic and NOT engage in personal attacks. Take control of your testosterone.
If you don't, you can bet the Moderator(s) will step in to restore civility; and he/they should. Otherwise things get out of control quickly.
Jake
Last edited by WW7; Mar 23, 2010 at 04:59 PM.


Seems this guy pulled off his MAF and claimed he had broken the generals code.
SO the discussion ensued for weeks and the mods had a hay day...
So as a MAF user I'll say this once, if it runs better without the MAF, something is wrong.

with that one
Just let me say one thing about this decision. Even though the car may be running better without the MAF hooked up, it is not running right. If you have a lean or rich condition ( which is very likely without MAF input) this can damage your engine over a fairly short time. Personally I would find out what is really wrong before just letting it go and driving the car as it is..Your call...WW










